The Student Oral Language Observation Matrix (SOLOM) is an assessment of oral language skills. The aim of this study was to examine psychometric properties of the SOLOM for preschoolers through (a) use of internal consistency methods to assess the reliability of the scores from the SOLOM and (b) examination of criterion-related validity by comparing the SOLOM with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). SOLOM internal consistency reliability was calculated using coefficient alpha; criterion-related validity was calculated using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients between the SOLOM and PPVT-4 scores of 90 preschool children. Results indicate that the SOLOM exhibits strong internal consistency reliability with criterion-related validity in the low to moderately correlated range. While additional research is necessary, results provide psychometric support for the use of the SOLOM as an informal assessment tool to be used by preschool teachers.
AdamoK. B.PrinceS. A.TriccoA. C.Connor-GorberS.TremblayM. (2009). A comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: A systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 4, 2–27. doi:10.1080/17477160802315010
2.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3.
BradfieldT. A.BesnerA. C.Wackerle-HollmanA. K.AlbanoA. D.RodriguezM. C.McConnellS. R. (2014). Redefining individual growth and development indicators: Oral Language. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39, 233–244. doi:10.1177/1534508413496837
4.
BrittainF. P. (1991). Effects of a maintenance bilingual bicultural program on fully English proficient students. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 8, 125–146.
5.
CabellS. Q.JusticeL. M.ZuckerT. A.KildayC. R. (2009). Validity of teacher report for assessing the emergent literacy skills of at-risk preschoolers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 161–173. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/07-0099)
6.
DickinsonD. K.GolinkoffR.Hirsh-PasekK. (2010). Speaking out for language: Why language is central to reading development. Educational Researcher, 39, 305–310. doi:10.3102/0013189X10370204
7.
DickinsonD. K.McCabeA.AnastasopoulosL.Peisner-FeinbergE. S.PoeM. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 465–481. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.465
FernaldA.WeislederA. (2011). Early language experience is vital to developing fluency in understanding. Handbook of Early Literacy Research, 3, 3–19.
11.
FrancisD. J.ShaywitzS. E.StuebingK. K.ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal individual growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.3
12.
InvernizziM.LandrumT. J.TeichmanA.TownsendM. (2010). Increased implementation of emergent literacy screening in pre-kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 437–446. doi:10.1007/s10643-009-0371-7
13.
KaragiozisH.GrayS.SaccoJ.ShapiroM.KawasC. (1998). The Direct Assessment of Functional Abilities (DAFA): A comparison to an indirect measure of instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 38, 113–121. doi:10.1093/geront/38.1.113
14.
KoranE. (2015). Assessment of EFL learners’ sociolinguistic and pragmatic competence and performance. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 1, 45–53.
15.
KushJ. C.ShawS. (2010). Review Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). In SpiesR. A.CarlsonJ. F.GeisingerK. F. (Eds.), The eighteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Center for Testing.
16.
LoniganC. J. (2006a). Conceptualizing phonological processing skills in prereaders. In DickinsonD. K.NeumanS. B. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2., pp. 77–89). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
LoniganC. J. (2006b). Development, assessment, and promotion of pre-literacy skills. Early Education and Development, 17, 191–114. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1701_5
18.
LoniganC. J.AllanN. P.LernerM. D. (2011). Assessment of preschool early literacy skills: Linking children’s educational needs with empirically supported instructional activities. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 488–501. doi:10.1002/pits.20569
19.
LoniganC. J.SchatschniederC.WestbergL. (2008). Impact of code-focused interventions on young children’s early literacy skills. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 107–151). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
20.
MarchmanV. A.FernaldA. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11, F9–F16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00671.x
21.
MessickS. (1987). Validity. ETS Research Report Series, 1987, i–208. doi:10.1002/j.2330-8516.1987.tb00244.x
22.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
23.
MorganP. L.MeierC. R. (2008). Dialogic reading’s potential to improve children’s emergent literacy skills and behavior. Preventing School Failure, 52, 11–16. doi:10.3200/PSFL.52.4.11-16
24.
MurphyK. R.DavidshoferC. O. (2004). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
NICHD (National Institute of Child Health & Development) Early Childhood Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41, 428–442. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.428
26.
ParkerD.DolsonD.GoldN. (1985). Student Oral Language Survey (SOLOM). Sacramento: Bilingual Education Office of the California Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/twi/EvalToolkit/appendix/solom.pdf
27.
RhodesR. L.OchoaS. H.OrtizS. O. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
SattlerJ. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
29.
SaundersW. M.O’BrienG. (2006). Oral language. In GeneseeF.Lindholm-LearyK.SaundersW.ChristianD. (Eds.), Educating English language learners (pp. 2–64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SemelE.WiigE. H.SecordW. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Fourth Edition (CELF-4). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
31.
StorchS. A.WhitehurstG. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934
32.
TorgesenJ. K.BurgessS. R. (1998). Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies. In MetsalaJ. L.EhriL. C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 161–188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
TuckerG. R.DonatoR.AntonekJ. L. (2008). Documenting growth in a Japanese FLES program. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 539–550. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01265.x
