The Participation and Sensory Environment Questionnaire–Teacher Version (PSEQ-TV) is a teacher report questionnaire designed to examine the impact of the sensory environment on participation for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study examines the construct validity of the assessment through principal components analysis (PCA). One hundred three preschool teachers completed the research version of the PSEQ-TV. Component analysis revealed six factors: modification, support, preschool tasks, group routines, mealtime, and tactile. This study provides evidence as to the construct validity of the PSEQ-TV. The PSEQ-TV can be used to identify sensory-related environmental barriers within the preschool environment. By identifying these barriers, teachers and other support staff can modify the environment and/or provide support to increase participation of preschool children with ASD across school environments.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl. 1), S1–S48.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2015). Occupational therapy for children and youth using sensory integration theory and methods in school-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(Suppl. 3), 6913410040p1–6913410040p20. doi:10.5014/ajot.2015.696S04
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
4.
AshburnerJ.ZivianiJ.RodgerS. (2008). Sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioral, and education outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 564–573. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.5.564
5.
AyresA. J. (1989). Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests: Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
6.
BedellG. M.KhetaniM. A.CousinsM. A.CosterW. J.LawM. C. (2011). Parent perspective to inform development measures of children’s participation and environment. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 765–773. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.029
7.
BrodM.TeslerL. E.ChristensenT. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Qualitative Life Research, 18, 1263–1278.
8.
Case-SmithJ.WeaverL. L.FristadM. A. (2015). A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 19, 133–148.
9.
ChanE. K. H. (2014). Standards and guidelines for validation practices: Development and evaluation of measurement instruments. In ZumboB. D.ChanE. K. H. (Eds.), Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health science (pp. 9–24). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
10.
ChapparoC.LoweS. (2012). School: Participating in more than just the classroom. In LaneS.BundyA. (Eds.), Kids can be kids: A childhood occupations approach (pp. 83–101). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
11.
ChristensenD. L.BilderD. A.WalterZ.PettygroveS.DurkinM. S.FitzgeraldR. T.. . . Yeargin-AllsoppM. (2016). Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among 4-year-old children in the autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 37, 1–8. doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000235
12.
CosterW.DeeneyT.HaltiwangerJ.HaleyS. (1998). School function assessment. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
13.
CosterW.LawM.BedellG.KhetaniM.CousinsM.TeplickyR. (2012). Development of the participation and environment measure for children and youth: Conceptual basis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 238–246. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.603017
14.
DeVillisR. F. (2006). Classical test theory. Medical Care, 44, S50–S59.
15.
DunnW. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 608–620. doi:10.5014/ajot.55.6.608
DziubanC. D.ShirkeyE. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis: Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361. doi:10.1037/h0036316
18.
EmilsonA.FolkessonA. (2006). Children’s participation and teacher control. Early Child Development and Care, 176, 219–238.
19.
Fernández-AndrésM. I.Pastor-CerezuelaG.Sanz-CerveraP.Tárraga-MínguezR. (2015). A comparative study of sensory processing in children with and without autism spectrum disorder in the home and classroom environments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 202–212. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.034
20.
GitlowL. (2014). Assessments of context: Physical environment. In AsherI. E. (Ed.), Asher’s occupational therapy assessment tools: An annotated index (4th ed., pp. 755–778). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
21.
GorsuchR. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
HowieF. (2016). The wonders of messy play [online]. Every Child, 22, 30–31.
23.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub.L. 108–446, 20 U.S.C SS 1400–1483.
24.
JohanssonI.SandbergA. (2010). Learning and participation: Two interrelated key-concepts in the preschool. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18, 229–242. doi:10.1080/13502931003784560
25.
KingG.LawM.KingS.RosenbaumP.KertoyM. K.YoungN. L. (2003). A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23, 63–90. doi:10.1080/J006v23n01_05
26.
KinnealeyM.PfeifferB.MillerJ.RoanC.ShoenerR.EllnerM. L. (2012). Effect of classroom modification on attention and engagement of students with autism or dyspraxia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 511–519. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.004010
27.
KramerJ. M.OlsenS.MermelsteinM.BalcellsA.LiljenquistK. (2012). Youth with disabilities’ perspectives of the environment and participation: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38, 763–777.
28.
KuhaneckH. M.KelleherJ. (2015). Development of the Classroom Sensory Environment Measure (CSEA). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(6), 6906180040p1–6906180040p9.
29.
LawM.CooperB.StrongS.StewardD.RigbyP.LettsL. (1996). The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.
30.
LocknerD. W.CroweT. K.SkipperB. J. (2008). Dietary intake and parents’ perception of mealtime behavior in preschool-age children with autism spectrum disorder and in typically developing children. Journal of American Dietetic Association, 108, 1360–1363. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.05.003
31.
McDowellI. (2006). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
NadonG.FeldmanD. E.DunnW.GiselE. (2010). Mealtime problems in children with autism spectrum disorder and their typically developing siblings: A comparison study. Autism, 15, 98–113. doi:10.1177/1362361309348943
OsborneJ. W. (2014). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis.
35.
ParhamL. D.EckerC.KuhaneckH. M.HenryD. A.GlennonT. J. (2007). Sensory Processing Measure (SPM): Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
36.
PillerA.FletcherT.PfeifferE.DunlapK.PickensN. (2017). Reliability of the Participation and Sensory Environment Questionnaire: Teacher version. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 3541–3549. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3273-3
37.
PillerA.PfeifferE. (2016). The sensory environment and participation of preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Occupation, Participation and Health, 36, 103–111. doi:10.1177/1539449216665116
38.
PituchK. A.StevensJ. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS (6th ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
39.
PortneyL. G.WatkinsM. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
40.
ReetJ. V. (2012). Learning through play: Procedural versus declarative knowledge. In PinkhamA. M.KaeferT.NeumanS. B. (Eds.), Knowledge development in early childhood: Sources of learning and classroom implications (pp. 18–34). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
RosenbergL.RatzonN. Z.JarusT.BartO. (2012). Perceived environmental restrictions for the participation of children with mild developmental disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38, 836–843. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01303.x
42.
SandbergA.ErikssonA. (2010). Children’s participation in preschool—On the conditions of the adults? Preschool staff’s concepts of children’s participation in preschool everyday life. Early Child Development and Care, 180, 619–631. doi:10.1080/03004430802181759
43.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340.
44.
Smith RoleyS.MaillouxZ.ParhamL. D.SchaafR. C.LaneC. J.CermakS. (2015). Sensory integration and praxis patterns in children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 1–8. doi:10.5014/ajot.2015.012476
45.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R. (2008). Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
TomchekS. D.HuebnerR. A.DunnW. (2014). Patterns of sensory processing in children with an autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1214–1224. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.006
48.
WhiteneckG.DijkersM. P. (2009). Difficult to measure constructs: Conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, S22–S35. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.009
ZachorD. A.Ben-ItzchakE. (2014). The relationship between clinical presentation and unusual sensory interests in autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 229–235. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1867-y
51.
ZivianiJ.RodgerS. (2006). Environmental influences on children’s participation. In ZivianiJ.RodgerS. (Eds.), Occupational therapy with children: Understanding children’s occupations and enabling participation (pp. 41–66). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
