The current study determined growth patterns during an 8-week writing intervention and then examined the association between growth pattern and students’ initial skills as determined by instructional-level data. One hundred forty-seven first-grade students struggling with early literacy skills received a writing intervention at one of two tiers of support and completed progress assessments at regular intervals. Results indicated that students followed more than one type of growth pattern. A moderate correspondence was found between growth pattern and instructional-level data. Current results are contextualized within previous research. Implications for adapting writing interventions based on student data and theoretical models of writing development are discussed.
AbbottR.BerningerV. W.FayolM. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 281–298.
2.
AhmedY.WagnerR. K.LopezD. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 419–434.
3.
AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
4.
Al OtaibaS.ConnorC. M.FolsomJ. S.WanzekJ.GreulichL.SchatschneiderC.WagnerR. K. (2014). To wait in Tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first grade response to intervention in reading. Exceptional Children, 81, 11–27.
5.
ArdoinS. P.DalyE. J. (2007). Introduction to the special series: Close encounters of the instructional kind—How the instructional hierarchy is shaping instructional research 30 years later. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 1–6.
6.
BatscheG.ElliottJ.GradenJ.GrimesJ.KovaleskiJ.PrasseD.. . . TillyW. D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
7.
BerningerV. W.AmtmannD. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
BerningerV. W.NielsenK. H.AbbottR. D.WijsmanE.RaskindW. (2008). Gender differences in severity of writing and reading disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 151–172.
9.
BerningerV. W.VaughanK. B.AbbottR. D.AbbottS. P.RoganL. W.BrooksA.. . . GrahamS. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 652–666.
10.
BerningerV. W.VaughnK. B.AbbottR. D.BrooksA.AbbottS.ReedE.GrahamS. (1998). Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching spelling unit of varying size within a multiple connections framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 587–605.
BurnsM. K. (2007). Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response-to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 297–313.
13.
BurnsM. K.CoddingR. S.BoiceC. H.LukitoG. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39, 69–83.
14.
BurnsM. K.ParkerD. C. (2014). Curriculum-based assessment for instructional design: Using data to individualize instruction. New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M.JibanC. L. (2006). Assessing the instructional level for mathematics: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 35, 401–418.
16.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.Kame’enuiE. J.TarverS. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
ChristT. J.ZopluogluC.MonaghenB. D.Van NormanE. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Multi-study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 19–57.
18.
CoddingR. S.ShiykoM.RussoM.BirchS.FanningE.JaspenD. (2007). Comparing mathematics interventions: Does initial level of fluency predict intervention effectiveness?Journal of School Psychology, 45, 603–617.
19.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
20.
CooperD.PikulskiJ. (2005). Here we go!Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
CutlerL.GrahamS. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919.
22.
DalyE. J.IIILentzF. E.Jr.BoyerJ. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369–386.
23.
EndersC. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128–141.
24.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7–21.
25.
GicklingE. E.ArmstrongD. L. (1978). Levels of instructional difficulty as related to on-task behavior, task completion, and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 559–566.
26.
GoughP. B.TunmerW. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
27.
GrahamS. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students’ compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791.
28.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2009). Almost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all with The Wrath of Khan. Learning Disabilities Research, 24, 58–68.
29.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.LarsenL. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 74–84.
30.
GravoisT. A.GicklingE. (2008). Best practices in instructional assessment. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 503–518). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
31.
HammillD. D.LarsenS. C. (1996). Test of Written Language—Third Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
32.
HaringN. G.EatonM. D. (1978). Systematic instructional technology: An instructional hierarchy. In HaringN. G.LovittT. C.EatonM. D.HansenC. L. (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23-40). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
33.
JedidiK.RamaswamyV.DesarboW. S. (1993). A maximum likelihood method for latent class regression involving a censored dependent variable. Psychometrika, 58, 375–394.
34.
JitendraA. K.HoppesM. K.XinY. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–139.
35.
JonesB. L.NaginD. S.RoederK. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 374–393.
36.
JonesD.ChristensenC. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49.
37.
JungT.WickramaK. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 302–317.
38.
KimY. S.Al OtaibaS.SidlerJ. F.GruelichL. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 461–469.
39.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
40.
LamE. A.McMasterK. L. (2014). Predictors of responsiveness to early literacy intervention a 10 year update. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 134–147. doi:10.1177/0731948714529772
41.
LeinemannT. O.GrahamS.Leader-JanssenB.ReidR. (2006). Improving writing performance of struggling writers in second grade. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 66–78.
42.
LeowC.MarcusS.ZanuttoE.BoruchR. (2004). Effects of advanced course-taking on math and science achievement: Addressing selection bias using propensity scores. American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 461–478.
43.
MathesP. G.DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M.AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J.SchatschneiderC. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–182.
44.
McCutchenD. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–324.
45.
McMasterK. L.DuX.YeoS.DenoS. L.ParkerD.EllisT. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77, 185–206.
46.
McMasterK. L.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445–463.
47.
MuthénB. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In KaplanD. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
48.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
49.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014–451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
50.
ParkerD. C.BurnsM. K. (2014). Using the instructional level as a criterion to target reading interventions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30, 79–94.
51.
ParkerD. C.BurnsM. K.McMasterK. L.ShapiroE. S. (2012). Extending curriculum-based assessment to early writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 33–43.
52.
ParkerD. C.DickeyB. N.BurnsM. K.McMasterK. L. (2012). An application of brief experimental analysis with early writing. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 329–349.
53.
ParkerD. C.McMasterK. L.BurnsM. K. (2011). Determining an instructional level for beginning writing skills. School Psychology Review, 40, 158–167.
54.
ParkerD. C.McMasterK. L.MedhanieA.SilberglittB. (2011). Modeling early writing growth with curriculum-based measures. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 290–314.
55.
Pearson. (2010). AIMSweb progress monitoring and improvement system. Available from http://www.aimsweb.com/
56.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
57.
RubinD. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592.
58.
SaddlerB.Asaro-SaddlerK. (2013). Response to intervention in writing: A suggested framework for screening, intervention, and progress monitoring. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29, 20–43.
59.
ShaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
60.
ShanahanT.LomaxR. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 116–123.
61.
ShwartzG. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
62.
SpeeceD. L.CaseL. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735–749.
63.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
64.
VideenJ.MarstonD.DenoS. L. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Vol. IRLD-RR-84). Minneapolis: Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, University of Minnesota.
65.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development (Lopez-MorillasM. Trans.). In ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
WangM.BodnerT. E. (2007). Growth mixture modeling: Identifying and predicting unobserved subpopulations with longitudinal data. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 635–656.
67.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126–142.
68.
WilliamsJ. P.StaffordK. B.LauerK. D.HallK. M.PolliniS. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 1–20.
69.
ZenoS. M.IvensS. H.MillardR. T.DuvvuriR. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. New York, NY: Touchstone, Applied Science.
