The purpose of this study was to extend a previous investigation of the psychometrics of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation–Screening Test (DELV-S) to include pre-kindergarten children (primarily African American and from low-income households). The previous study (Petscher, Connor, & Al Otaiba, 2012) included a racially and socioeconomically diverse sample of children in kindergarten through second grade. Similar to that study, two factors were found in the present study: one representing morphosyntactic ability and one representing nonword repetition ability. However, unlike the previous study, measurement invariance was not observed in the present sample. As a result, to allow for interpretation of performance in similar samples who would likely use the DELV-S, vertical scaling was used to create a new set of norms for ability scores and a new reference table for fall and spring of the pre-kindergarten school year.
CraigH. K.WashingtonJ. A. (2004). Grade-related changes in the production of African American English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 450–463.
2.
De AyalaR. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
HabermanS. J. (1978). Analysis of Qualitative Data: Vol. 1. Introductory topics. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
4.
HortonR.ApelK. (2014). Examining the use of spoken dialect indices with African American children in the southern United States. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 448–460.
5.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
6.
KlingnerJ. K.ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE.HarryB.ZionS.TateW.RileyD. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, Article 38.
7.
MervisC. B. (2004). Cross-etiology comparisons of cognitive and language development. In RiceM. L.WarrenS. F. (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies (pp. 153-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
National Institute on Early Education Research. (2012). The state of preschool 2012. New Brunswick, NJ: Author.
9.
PetscherY.ConnorC. M.Al OtaibaS. (2012). Psychometric analysis of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation Assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37, 243–250.
10.
PiantaR. C.BarnettW. S.BurchinalM.ThornburgK. R. (2009). The effects of preschool education: What we know, how public policy is or is not aligned with the evidence base, and what we need to know. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(2), 49–88. doi:10.1177/1529100610381908
11.
SeymourH. N.Bland-StewartL.GreenL. J. (1998). Difference versus deficit in child African American English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 96–108.
12.
SeymourH. N.RoeperT.de VilliersJ. (2003). Diagnostic evaluation of language variation (DELV) screening test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
13.
StockmanI. J. (2010). A review of developmental and applied language research on African American children: From a deficit to difference perspective on dialect differences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 23–38.
14.
TakaneY.De LeeuwJ. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393–408.
15.
TerryN. P.ConnorC.M. (2012). Changing nonmainstream American English use and early reading achievement from kindergarten to first grade. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 21, 78–86.
16.
TerryN. P.BrownM. C.StuckeyA. (2015). African American children’s early language and literacy learning in the context of spoken dialect variation. In BahrR. H.SillimanE. R. (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders (pp. 303–312). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
17.
TerryN. P.ConnorC. M.JohnsonL.StuckeyA.TaniN. (2015). Dialect variation, dialect-shifting, and reading comprehension in second grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 267–295. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9593-9
18.
TerryN. P.ConnorC. M.PetscherY.ConlinC. (2012). Dialect variation and reading: Is change in nonmainstream American English use related to reading achievement in first and second grades?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 55–69.
19.
WainerH.DoransN. J.FlaugherR.MislevyR. J.ThissenD.EignorD.SteinbergL. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
WashingtonJ. A.CraigH. K. (2004). A language screening protocol for use with young African American children in urban settings. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 329–340.
21.
WashingtonJ. A.TerryN. P.SeidenbergM. (2013). Language variation and literacy learning: The case of African American English. In StoneC. A.SillimanE. R.EhrenB. J.WallachG. P. (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (2nd ed., pp. 204–222). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
WolframW.Schilling-EstesN. (2006). American English (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
