This study investigated the classification accuracy of the Dynamic Indicators of Vocabulary Skills (DIVS) as a preschool vocabulary screening measure. With a sample of 240 preschoolers, fall and winter DIVS scores were used to predict year-end vocabulary risk using the 25th percentile on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third Edition (PPVT-III) to denote risk status. Results indicated that DIVS Picture Naming Fluency (PNF) and Reverse Definition Fluency (RDF) demonstrated very good accuracy in classifying students according to year-end vocabulary risk status. The DIVS measures also demonstrated stronger accuracy than demographic characteristics known to be indicators of vocabulary difficulties (socioeconomic status, English learner [EL] status, and sex). Combining PNF and RDF did not result in sufficient improvement in accuracy to justify administering both measures as opposed to just one. Further examination of predictive probability values revealed the potential for DIVS measures to improve the precision of vocabulary risk identification over considering EL status alone. Overall, results supported the use of the DIVS as a brief and inexpensive tool for preschool vocabulary screening.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (2007). Increasing young low income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 251–271. doi:10.1086/511706
2.
BornsteinM. H.HahnC. S.HaynesO. M. (2004). Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Language, 24, 267–304. doi:10.1177/0142723704045681
3.
BornsteinM. H.LeachD. B.HaynesO. (2004). Vocabulary competence in first- and secondborn siblings of the same chronological age. Journal of Child Language, 31, 855–873. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006518
4.
BouchardC.TrudeauN.SuttonA.BoudreaultM. C.DeneaultJ. (2009). Gender differences in language development in French Canadian children between 8 and 30 months of age. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 685–707. doi:10.1017/S0142716409990075
5.
CarverR. P. (1994). Percentage of unknown vocabulary words in text as a function of the relative difficulty of the text: Implications for instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 26, 413–437. doi:10.1080/10862969409547861
6.
CattsH. W.ComptonD.TomblinJ. B.BridgesM. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181. doi:10.1037/a0025323
7.
CattsH. W.PetscherY.SchatschneiderC.BridgesM. S.MendozaK. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163–176. doi:10.1177/0022219408326219
ClemensN. H.ShapiroE. S.ThoemmesF. (2011). Improving the efficacy of first grade reading screening: An investigation of word identification fluency with other early literacy indicators. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 231–244.
10.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BryantJ. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394–409. doi:10.1037/a0018448
11.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.EllemanA. M.GilbertJ. K. (2008). Tracking children who fly below the radar: Latent transition modeling of students with late- emerging reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 329–337. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.003
12.
CoyneM. D.SimmonsD. C.Kame’enuiE. J.StoolmillerM. (2004). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality, 12, 145–162. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1203_3
13.
DenoS. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
14.
DenoS. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
15.
DickinsonD. K.TaborsP. O. (Eds.). (2001). Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. . . JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 431, 428–1446.
17.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19.
FarkasG.BeronK. (2004). The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: Differences by class and race. Social Science Research, 33, 464–497. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.08.001
20.
FensonL.DaleP. S.ReznickJ. S.BatesE.ThalD. J.PethickS. J.StilesJ. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1–185.
21.
FishM.PinkermanB. (2003). Language skills in low-SES rural Appalachian children: Normative development and individual differences, infancy to preschool. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 539–565. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(02)00141-7
22.
FletcherJ. M.ShaywitzS. E.ShankweilerD. P.KatzL.LibermanI. Y.StuebingK. K.ShaywitzB. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.
23.
FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.StuebingK. K.LyonG. R.ShaywitzB. A.ShaywitzS. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98–108. doi:10.1177/00222194050380020101
24.
GischlarK. L.ShapiroE. S. (2014). Efficiency in assessing emergent literacy skills in students attending Head Start. NHSA Dialog, 17, 1–16.
25.
GonzalezJ. E.Pollard-DurodolaS.SimmonsD. C.TaylorA. B.DavisM. J.KimM.SimmonsL. (2010). Developing low-income preschoolers’ social studies and science vocabulary knowledge through content-focused shared book reading. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 25–52. doi:10.1080/19345747.2010.487927
26.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
27.
HancockT. B.KaiserA. P.DelaneyE. M. (2002). Teaching parents of high-risk preschoolers strategies to support language and positive behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 191–212. doi:10.1177/027112140202200402
28.
HansonM. J.MillerA. D.DiamondK.OdomS.LieberJ.ButeraG.FlemingK. (2011). Neighborhood community risk influences on preschool children’s development and school readiness. Infants & Young Children, 24, 87–100. doi:10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182008dd0
29.
HartB.RisleyT. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
30.
Hsueh-ChaoM. H.NationP. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 403–430.
31.
JeanM.GevaE. (2009). The development of vocabulary in English as a second language children and its role in predicting word recognition ability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 153–185. doi:10.1017/S0142716408090073
32.
JenkinsJ. R.HudsonR. F.JohnsonE. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–600.
33.
JohnsonE. S.JenkinsJ. R.PetscherY.CattsH. W. (2009). How can we improve the accuracy of screening instruments?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 174–185. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00291.x
34.
JoshiR. M. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 209–219. doi:10.1080/10573560590949278
35.
JusticeL. M.MeierJ.WalpoleS. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 17–32. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2005/003)
36.
KelleyE. S.GoldsteinH.SpencerT. D.ShermanA. (2015). Effects of automated Tier 2 storybook intervention on vocabulary and comprehension learning in preschool children with limited oral language skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.12.004
37.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
LandryS.AsselM. A.GunnewigS. B.SwankP. R. (2007). mCLASS:CIRCLE. New York, NY: Wireless Generation.
39.
LoniganC.SchatschneiderC.WestbergL. (2008). Identification of children’s skills and abilities linked to later outcomes in reading, writing, and spelling. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 55–106). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
40.
MarcotteA. M.ParkerC.FureyW.HandsJ. L. (2013). An Examination of the validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Vocabulary Skills (DIVS). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 133–145. doi:10.1177/0734282913498849
41.
MarquardtD. W. (1970). Generalized inverses, ridge regression, and biased linear estimation. Technometrics, 12, 591–612.
42.
McConnellS. R. (2004). Psychometric characteristics of Individual Growth and Development Indicators: Picture naming, rhyme, and alliteration (Technical Report No. 8). Minneapolis: Center for Early Education and Development, University of Minnesota.
43.
McConnellS. R.BradfieldT.Wackerle-HollmanA.RodriguezM. (2012). Technical Information Summary Sheet: Individual Growth & Development Indicators of Early Literacy (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: Early Learning Labs.
44.
McGraw-Hill. (2003). Open Court Reading, Pre-Kindergarten. Columbus, OH: Author.
45.
MissallK. M.McConnellS. R. (2010). Early literacy and language IGDIs for preschool-aged children. In CartaJ. J.GreenwoodC. R. (Eds.), Individual Growth and Development Indicators: Tools for monitoring progress and measuring growth in very young children (pp. 181–202). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
46.
NagyW. E.ScottJ. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In KamilM. L.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
NationK. (2009). Reading comprehension and vocabulary. In WagnerR. K.SchatschneiderC.Phythian-SenceC. (Eds.), Beyond decoding (pp. 176–194). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48.
NationK.SnowlingM. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85–101. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2564
49.
NelsonH. D.NygrenP.WalkerM.PanoschaR. (2006). Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: Systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics, 117, 298–319. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1467
50.
NewcomerP. L.HammillD. D. (2008). Test of Language Development Primary–Fourth Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
51.
OuelletteG. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
52.
ParkerC. (2000). Identifying technically adequate measures of vocabulary for young children at risk for reading disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon, Eugene.
53.
ParkerC. (2006). Examining the concurrent validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Vocabulary Skills (Technical Report No. 3). Westport, MA: Author.
54.
ParkerC.DitkowskyB. (2006). Examining the predictive validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Vocabulary Skills (Technical Report No. 4). Westport, MA: Author.
55.
PhillipsB. M.LoniganC. J.WyattM. (2009). Predictive validity of the Get Ready to Read! Screener: Concurrent and long-term relations with reading-related skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 133–147. doi:10.1177/0022219408326209
56.
Pollard-DurodolaS. D.GonzalezJ. E.SimmonsD. C.KwokO.TaylorA. B.DavisM. J.. . . SimmonsL. (2011). The effects of an intensive shared book-reading intervention for preschool children at risk for vocabulary delay. Exceptional Children, 77, 161–183. doi:10.1177/001440291107700202
57.
ProctorC. P.CarloM.AugustD.SnowC. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246
58.
PullenP. C.TuckwillerE. D.KonoldT. R.MaynardK. L.CoyneM. D. (2010). A tiered intervention model for early vocabulary instruction: The effects of tiered instruction for young students at risk for reading disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 110–123. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00309.x
59.
SchmittN.JiangX.GrabeW. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 26–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
60.
SénéchalM.OuelletteG.RodneyD. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of vocabulary to reading. In NeumanS. B.DickinsonD. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy (Vol. 2, pp. 173–182). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
61.
ShanahanT. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 171–183). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
62.
SnowC.BurnsS.GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63.
SpeeceD. L.SchatschneiderC.SilvermanR.CaseL. P.CooperD. H.JacobsD. M. (2011). Identification of reading problems in first grade within a response-to-intervention framework. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 585–607. doi:10.1086/659032
64.
SwetsJ. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293. doi:10.1126/science.3287615
65.
TaborsP. O.PaezM.LópezL. M. (2003). Dual language abilities of bilingual four-year olds: Initial findings from the early childhood study of language and literacy development of Spanish-speaking children. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 1, 70–91. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0055
66.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2010). Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled kindergarteners in the context of language minority status and classroom phonics instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 786–803. doi:10.1037/a0019639
67.
WhiteT. G.GravesM. F.SlaterW. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 281–290. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.281
68.
WhitehurstG. J.LoniganC. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06247.x
69.
WhitehurstG. J.LoniganC. J. (2001). Get Ready to Read! Screening tool. New York, NY: Center for Learning Disabilities.
70.
WilsonS. B.LoniganC. J. (2009). An evaluation of two emergent literacy screening tools for preschool children. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 115–131. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0026-9
71.
ZimmermanI. L.SteinerV. G.PondR. E. (2002). Preschool Language Scale–4th Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
72.
ZipoliR. P.CoyneM. D.McCoachD. B. (2011). Enhancing vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Strategic integration of semantically-related and embedded word review. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 131–143. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/861417987?accountid=14572
