This study examined whether curriculum-based measures (CBMs) of math word-problem contributed unique variance in predictions of performance on high-stakes tests, beyond the contribution of calculation and reading skills. CBMs were administered to a representative sample of 142 third-grade students at three time points. Results indicate that problem-solving CBMs uniquely predicted a problem-solving composite measure and the California Standardized and Reporting test, and were able to discriminate students at risk and not at risk for math difficulties. Implications for practice are discussed.
AnderssonU. (2007). The contribution of working memory to children’s mathematical word problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1201–1216. doi:10.1002/acp.1317
2.
BennettR. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
3.
BrownV. L.HammillD.WeiderholtL. (1995). Test of Reading Comprehension. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
4.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. London, England: SAGE.
5.
California Department of Education. (2009). Standardized testing and reporting (STAR). Available from http://starsamplequestions.org/
6.
ChristT. J. (2006). Short-term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimating standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review, 35, 128–133.
7.
ClarkeB.NeseJ. F. T.AlonzoJ.SmithJ. L. M.TindalG.Kame’enuiE. J.BakerS. K. (2011). Classification accuracy of easy CBM first-grade mathematics measures: Findings and implications for the field. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 243–255. doi:10.1177/1534508411414153
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BoutonB.GilbertJ. K.BarqueroL. A.. . . CrouchR. C. (2010). Selecting at-risk first grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 327–340. doi:10.1037/a0018448
10.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BryantJ. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394–409. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.394
11.
ConnollyA. J. (1998). KeyMath (revised/normative update). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.
DenoS. L.ReschlyA. L.LembkeE. S.MagnussonD.CallenderS. A.WindramH.StachelN. (2009). Developing a school-wide progress-monitoring system. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 44–55. doi:10.1002/pits.20353
15.
FoegenA.JibanC.DenoS. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 121–139. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020101
16.
FoegenA.OlsonJ. R.Impecoven-LindL. (2008). Developing progress monitoring measures for secondary mathematics: An illustration in algebra. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 240–249. doi:10.1177/1534508407313489
17.
FuchsL. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188–192.
18.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HollenbeckC. L.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M. (2011). Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 372–380. doi:10.1177/0022219411407867
19.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PowellS. R.SchumacherR. F.HamlettC. L.. . . VukovicR. K. (2012). Contributions of domain-general cognitive resources and different forms of arithmetic development to pre-algebraic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1315-1326. doi:10.1037/a0027475
20.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CapizziA. M.. . . FletcherJ. M. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 29–43. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.29
21.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.CoureyS. J. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement of mathematics competence: From computation to concepts and applications to real-life problem solving. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 33–46. doi:10.1177/073724770503000204
22.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.SteckerP. M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6–22.
23.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.ThompsonA.RobertsP. H.KubekP.SteckerP. M. (1994). Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 19(4), 23–49. doi:10.1177/073724779401900403
24.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.KarnsK.HamlettC. L.KatzaroffM. (1999). Mathematics performance assessment in the classroom: Effects on teacher planning and student problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 609–646. doi:10.3102/00028312036003609
25.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK. (2004). Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 293–306. doi:10.1177/00222194040370040201
26.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK.BurchM.HamlettC. L.OwenR.. . . JancekD. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 293–305. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.293
27.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK.HamlettC. L.FinelliR.CoureyS. J. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 635–647. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.635
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools. (Practice Guide Report: NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
30.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
31.
GrimmK. J. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 410–426. doi:10.1080/87565640801982486
32.
Harcourt Brace & Company. (1996). Stanford Achievement Test (9th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33.
HospM. K.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2007). The ABC’s of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC. C.McGoeyK.GardillM. G.BhatP.RileyT. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345–355. doi:10.1080/00220679809597564
36.
JitendraA. K.SczesniakE.Deatline-BuchmanA. (2005). An exploratory validation of curriculum-based mathematical word problem solving tasks as indicators of mathematics proficiency for third graders. School Psychology Review, 34, 358–371.
37.
KelleyB.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2008). Curriculum-based evaluation and math: An overview. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 250–256. doi:10.1177/1534508407313490
38.
LehJ. M.JitendraA. K.CaskieG. I. L.GriffinC. C. (2007). An evaluation of curriculum-based measurement of mathematics word problem-solving measures for monitoring third-grade students’ mathematics competence. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 90–99. doi:10.1177/15345084070320020601
39.
LembkeE.FoegenA. (2009). Identifying early numeracy indicators for kindergarten and first-grade students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 12–20. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.01273.x
40.
MossmanD. (2013). Evaluating risk assessments using receiver operating characteristic analysis: Rationale, advantages, insights, and limitations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 23–39. doi:10.1002/bsl.2050
41.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2011 (NCES 2012-458). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
42.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
43.
PepeM.LongtonG.JanesH. (2009). Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. Stata Journal, 9, 1–12.
44.
Psychological Corporation. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio TX: Harcourt Brace.
45.
Riverside. (1995). Performance assessment of the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Chicago, IL: Author.
46.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ. E.BoltS. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
47.
SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS/STAT user’s guide. Cary, NC: Author.
48.
ShapiroE. S.EdwardsL.ZigmondN. (2005). Progress monitoring of mathematics among students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 15–32. doi:10.1177/073724770503000203
49.
ShinnM. R.GoodR. H.SteinS. (1989). Summarizing trend in student achievement: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 18, 356–370.
50.
SieglerR. S.OpferJ. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representation of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237–243. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02438
51.
SwansonH. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471–491. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.471
52.
Vilenius-TuohimaaP. M.AunolaK.NurmiJ.-E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28, 409–426. doi:10.1080/01443410701708228
53.
WilburneJ. M. (2006). Preparing preservice elementary school teachers to teach problem solving. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12, 454–463.
54.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K.Deatline-BuchmanA. (2005). Effects of mathematical word- problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 181–192. doi:10.1177/00224669050390030501
