There has been increased attention to the development of assessment measures for evaluating mathematical skills in young children in order to inform instruction and intervention. However, existing tools have focused primarily on number sense with little attention to other areas of mathematical thinking such as geometry and algebra. The purpose of this study is to describe preliminary reliability and validity evidence for several curriculum-based measures designed to assess mathematical skills in preschool children. Interscorer, test–retest, alternate-form reliability, and concurrent validity of five tasks—Cardinality, Pattern Completion, Shape Naming Fluency, Shape Selection Fluency, and Shape Composition—were examined in a small sample of preschool-age children at risk for academic difficulties because of demographic characteristics. Results indicated strong interscorer reliability, moderate to strong test–retest reliability, and adequate alternate-form reliability. Concurrent validity coefficients ranged from weak and nonsignificant to strong, positive significant correlations. However, non-domain specific correlations were demonstrated, and there was no clear pattern of convergent and divergent validity. Findings are discussed in the context of necessary research in early math measurement for preschoolers.
ArnoldD. H.FisherP. H.DoctoroffG. L.DobbsJ. (2002). Accelerating math development in Head Start classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 762–770.
2.
BrackenB. A. (1998). Bracken Basic Concept Scale–Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
3.
BrackenB. A. (2006). Bracken Basic Concept Scale–Third Edition: Receptive. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
4.
BrassardM. R.BoehmA. E. (2007). Preschool assessment: Principles and practices. New York: Guilford.
5.
BriganceA. (1985). Brigance Preschool Screen. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
6.
ChardD.ClarkeB.BakerS.OtterstedtJ.BraunD.KatzR. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 3–14.
7.
ClarkeB.ShinnM. R. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234–284.
8.
ClementsD. H. (2004a). Part one: Major themes and recommendations. In ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.DiBiaseA. M. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics education: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 1–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
ClementsD. H. (2004b). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.DiBiaseA. M. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics education: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 267–297). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.
11.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
13.
DalyE. J.IIIWrightJ. A.KellyS. Q.MartensB. K. (1997). Measures of early academic skills: Reliability and validity with a first grade sample. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 268–280.
14.
DenoS. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
15.
DenoS. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1–17). New York: Guilford.
16.
DenoS. L. (2003). Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
17.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.
18.
FloydR. G.HojnoskiR.KeyJ. (2006). Preliminary evidence for the technical adequacy of the preschool numeracy indicators. School Psychology Review, 35, 627–644.
19.
FoeganA.JibanC.DenoS. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 121–139.
20.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamletC. L.SteckerP. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617–641.
21.
GinsburgH. P.BaroodyA. J. (1990). Test of Early Mathematics Ability–Second Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
22.
GinsburgH. P.BaroodyA. J. (2003). Test of Early Mathematics Ability–Third Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
23.
HojnoskiR. L.FloydR. G.SilberglittB. (2009). Sensitivity to growth over time of the preschool numeracy indicators with a sample of preschoolers in Head Start. School Psychology Review, 38, 402–418.
24.
HreskoW. P.PeakP. K.HerronS. R.BridgesD. L. (2000). Young Children’s Achievement Test. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
25.
LagoR. M.DiPernaJ. C. (2010). Number sense in kindergarten: A factor-analytic study of the construct. School Psychology Review, 39, 164–180.
26.
LeiP. W.WuQ.DiPernaJ. C.MorganP. L. (2009). Developing short forms of the EARLI numeracy measures: Comparison of item selection methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 825–842.
27.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
28.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
29.
National Research Council (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30.
ReidE. E.MorganP. L.DiPernaJ. C.LeiP. W. (2006). Development of measures to assess young children’s early academic skills: Preliminary findings from a head start- university partnership. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 3, 25–38.
31.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ.BoltS. (2010). Assessment in special and inclusive education (11th ed.). New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin.
32.
SaramaJ.ClementsD. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
SlusserE. B.SarneckaB. W. (2011). Find the picture of eight turtles: A link between children’s counting and their knowledge of number word semantics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 38–51.
34.
SnyderP. A.WixsonC. S.TalapatraD.RoachA. T. (2008). Assessment in early childhood: Instruction focused strategies to support response-to-intervention frameworks. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 25–34.
35.
StarkeyP.KleinA.ChangI.QiD.LijuanP.YangZ. (1999, April). Environmental supports for young children’s mathematical development in China and the United States. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
36.
StarkeyP.KleinA.WakeleyA. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.00210.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.002
37.
VanDerHeydenA. M. (2005). Intervention-driven assessment practices in early childhood/early intervention: Measuring what is possible instead of what is present. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 28–33.
38.
VanDerHeydenA. M.BroussardC.CooleyA. (2006). Further development of measures of early math performance for preschoolers. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 533–553.
39.
VanDerHeydenA. M.BroussardC.FabreM.StanleyJ.LegendreJ.CreppellR. (2004). Development and validation of curriculum-based measures of math performance for preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 27, 27–41.
40.
VanDerHeydenA. M.SnyderP. (2006). Integrating frameworks from early childhood intervention and school psychology to accelerate growth for all children. School Psychology Review, 35, 519–534.
41.
VanDerHeydenA. M.WittJ. C.NaquinG.NoellG. (2001). The reliability and validity of curriculum-based readiness probes for kindergarten students. School Psychology Review, 30, 363–382.
42.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
43.
WuH. (2007). Whole numbers, fractions, and rational numbers. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
