The Screening Test for Emotional Problems–Self-Report (STEP-S) was designed to assess students aged 10 to 17 years referred for wide-ranging emotional disturbances categorized under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Preliminary analysis indicated that subscale coefficients alpha ranged from .76 to .85 and test–retest coefficients from .65 to .79. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a marginal fit of the five-factor model to the data, whereas substantial support was provided for diagnostic, convergent, and discriminant score validity.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders (4th ed.–text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
ConnersC. K. (2008). Manual for the Conners 3. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
CullinanD.SabornieE. (2004). Characteristics of emotional disturbances in middle and high school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 157–167.
4.
DimitrovD. (2008a). Factor analysis and other multivariate methods. In ErfordB. T. (Ed.), Research and evaluation in counseling (pp. 509–523). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin/Lahaska Press.
5.
DimitrovD. (2008b). Quantitative research in education: Intermediate & advanced methods. Oceanside, NY: Whittier.
6.
EpsteinM. H.NordnessP. D.CullinanD.HertzogM. (2002). Scale for assessing emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 141–148.
7.
ErfordB. T. (2004). The Reading Essential Skill Screener—Preschool Version (RESS-P): Studies of reliability and validity. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(3), 19–34.
8.
ErfordB. T.HaseK. (2006). Reliability and validity of scores on the ADD-H Comprehensive Teacher Rating Scale—Second Edition (ACTeRS-2). Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 39, 97–106.
9.
ErfordB. T.MillerE. M.IsbisterK. (2010). The Disruptive Behavior Rating Scale–2nd Edition - Self-Report (DBRS-II-S): Studies of reliability and validity. Manuscript under review.
10.
ErfordB. T.ScheinH.DuncanK. (in press). Technical analysis of scores on the Self-Efficacy Self-Report Scale (SESRS). Assessment for Effective Intervention.
11.
ErfordB. T.StephensV. M. (2005). The Reading Essential Skill Screener—Elementary version (RESS-E): Studies of reliability and validity. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38, 104–114.
12.
ErfordB. T.VoucasS.DewlinE. (2010). The Self-Evaluation Scale—Self-report (SES-S) version: Studies of reliability and validity. Manuscript under review.
13.
FuchsD.MockD.MorganP. L.YoungC. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157–171.
14.
GloverT. A.AlbersC. A. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 117–135.
15.
KampsD.KravitsT.StolzeJ.SwaggartB. (1999). Prevention strategies for at-risk students and students with EBD in urban elementary schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 178–188.
16.
MashE. J.DozoisD. J. A. (2002). Child psychopathology: A developmental systems perspective. In MashE. J.BarkleyR. A. (Eds.), Child psychology (2nd ed., pp. 3–71). New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
MuthenL. K.MuthenB. O. (2007). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
18.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). The Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (P.L. 108–446). Washington, DC: Author.
19.
U.S. House of Representatives. (1997). Report No. 105–95. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
WagnerM.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.EpsteinM. H.SumiW. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96.
21.
WalkerH. M.RamseyE.GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
