Spelling is an important, but often overlooked, component of literacy instruction and development. Although it is related to other aspects of literacy, there are independent theories of spelling development as well as assessment and instructional strategies that align with these theories. This article summarizes the rationale for linking assessment and instruction within the domain of spelling and provides an overview of this special series on spelling assessment and instruction.
Berninger, V.W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R.D., Brooks, A., Begay, K., Curtin, G., Byrd, K., & Graham, S. ( 2000). Language-based spelling instruction: Teaching children to make multiple connections between spoken and written words. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 117-135.
2.
Ehri, L.C. ( 1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Graham, S. ( 1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly , 22, 78-98.
4.
Hosp, J.L. (in press-a). Linking assessment and instruction: Teacher preparation and professional development. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
5.
Hosp, J.L. (in press-b). Using assessment data to make decisions about teaching and learning. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
6.
Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Springer.
7.
Moats, L.C. ( 1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do (Report No. 39-0372). Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
8.
Moats, L.C. ( 2005-2006). How spelling supports reading. American Educator, 29(4). Retrieved from http://archive.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/issues/winter05-06/Moats.pdf
9.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2009). The nation’s report card: Reading 2009 (NCES 2010-458) . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
10.
Perfetti, C.A. ( 1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 21-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Post, Y.V., Carreker, S., & Holland, G. ( 2001). The spelling of final letter patterns: A comparison of instruction at the level of the phoneme and the rime. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 121-146.
12.
Smartt, S.M., & Reschly, D.J. ( 2007, June). Barriers to the preparation of highly qualified teachers in reading. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
13.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RtI: A closer look at response to intervention.Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/images/stories/pdfs/rtiessentialcomponents_042710.pdf
14.
Venezky, R.L. ( 1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York, NY: Guilford.
