The authors examined the psychometric properties of the Student Risk Screening Scale, as used in three ethnically, culturally, and economically diverse urban midwestern elementary schools. The results suggest strong internal consistency (α = .81—.82) and test-retest stability (r = .86). Initial ratings of risk as measured by the Student Risk Screening Scale were statistically significant in predicting year-end office discipline referral rates and springtime oral reading fluency scores. Students with higher levels of risk at the onset of the academic year were likely to end the year with moderately higher rates of office discipline referrals and low to moderately lower oral reading fluency proficiency levels. Limitations and future directions are offered.
Achenbach, T.M. ( 1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YRS, & TRF profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
AIMSweb benchmark and progress monitoring system for grades K-8. ( 2008). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Education .
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
4.
Carter, E.W., Lane, K.L., Pierson, M., & Glaeser, B. ( 2006). Self-determination skills and opportunities of transition-age youth with emotional disturbance and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 333-346.
5.
Dinkes, R., Kemp, J., & Baum, K. ( 2009). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2009 (NCES 2010-012/NCJ 228478). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Drummond, T. ( 1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program .
7.
Drummond, T., Eddy, J.M., & Reid, J.B. ( 1998a). Follow-up study #3: Risk screening scale: Prediction of negative outcomes by 10th grade from 2nd grade screening. Unpublished technical report, Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene.
8.
Drummond, T., Eddy, J.M., & Reid, J.B. ( 1998b). Follow-up study #4: Risk screening scale: Prediction of negative outcomes in two longitudinal samples. Unpublished technical report, Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene.
9.
Drummond, T., Eddy, J.M., Reid, J.B., & Bank, L. ( 1994, November). The Student Risk Screening Scale: A brief teacher screening instrument for conduct disorder. Presented at the Fourth Annual Prevention Conference, Washington, DC.
10.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.) (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.) Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
11.
Goodman, R. ( 1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586.
12.
Goodman, R. ( 2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345.
13.
Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. ( 1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, 125-130.
14.
Goodman, R., & Scott, S. ( 1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17-24.
15.
Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N.( 1990). The Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
16.
Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E.J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
17.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. (2004).
18.
Kalberg, J.R., Lane, K.L., Driscoll, S.A., & Wehby, J.H. (in press). Systematic screening for emotional and behavioral disorders at the high school level: A formidable and necessary task. Remedial and Special Education.
19.
Kamps, D.M., Wills, H.P., Greenwood, C.R., Thorne, S., Lazo, J.F., Crockett, J.L., et al. (2003). Curriculum influences on growth in early reading fluency for students with academic and behavioral risks: a descriptive study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 211-224.
20.
Kauffman, J.M., & Brigham, F.J., (2009). Working with troubled children. Verona, WI: Full Court.
21.
Kraemer, H.C. ( 1992). Evaluating medical tests: Objective and quantitative guidelines. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
22.
Lane, K.L., Bruhn, A.L., Eisner, S.L., & Kalberg, J.R. (in press). Score reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: A psychometrically-sound, feasible tool for use in urban middle schools . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.
23.
Lane, K.L., Kalberg, J.R., Bruhn, A.L., Mahoney, M.E., & Driscoll, S.A. (2008). Primary prevention programs at the elementary level: Issues of treatment integrity, systematic screening, and reinforcement. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 465-494.
24.
Lane, K.L., Kalberg, J.R., Lambert, W., Crnobori, M., & Bruhn, A. ( 2010). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders: A replication. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 100-112.
25.
Lane, K.L., Kalberg, J.R., & Menzies, H.M. ( 2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A step-by-step approach. New York: Guilford.
26.
Lane, K.L., Kalberg, J.R., Parks, R.J., & Carter, E.W. ( 2008). Student Risks Screening Scale: Initial evidence for score reliability and validity at the high school level. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 178-190.
27.
Lane, K.L., Little, M.A., Casey, A.M., Lambert, W., Wehby, J.H., Weisenbach, J.L., et al. (2009). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders: How do they compare? Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 93-105.
28.
Lane, K.L., Parks, R.J., Kalberg, J.R., & Carter, E.W. ( 2007). Systematic screening at the middle school level: Score reliability and validity of the students risk screening scale. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 209-222.
29.
Lane, K.L., Wehby, J., Robertson, E.J., & Rogers, L. ( 2007). How do different types of high school students respond to positive behavior support programs? Characteristics and responsiveness of teacher-identified students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 3-20.
30.
Lanyon, R. ( 2006). Mental health screening: Utility of the psychological screening inventory. Psychological Services, 3, 170-180.
31.
McIntosh, K., Campbell, A.L., Russell, D., & Zumbo, B.D. ( 2009). Concurrent validity of office discipline referrals and cut points used in schoolwide positive behavior support. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 100-113.
32.
Menzies, H.M., & Lane, K.L. ( 2010). Validity of the student risk screening scale: Evidence of predictive validity in a diverse, suburban elementary setting. Manuscript submitted for publication
33.
Morgan, P.L., Farkas, G., Tufis, P.A., & Sperling, R.A. (2008). Are reading and behavior problems risk factors for each other? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 417-436.
34.
Nelson, N.J., Babyak, A., Gonzalez, J., & Benner, G.J. ( 2003). An investigation of the types of problem behaviors exhibited by K-12 students with emotional or behavioral disorders in public school settings . Behavioral Disorders, 28, 348-359.
35.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: McGraw-Hill.
36.
O’Shaughnessy, T.E., Lane, K.L., Gresham, F.M., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M.E. (2003). Children placed at risk for learning and behavioral difficulties: Implementing a school-wide system of early identification and intervention. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 27-35.
37.
Sugai, G., Sprague, J.R., Horner, R.H., & Walker, H.M. ( 2000). Preventing school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 94-101.
38.
Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A.J., Epstein, M.H., & Sumi, W.C. ( 2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbance receiving special education services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders , 13, 79-96.
39.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Garza, N. ( 2006). An overview of findings from wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
40.
Walker, H.M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F.M. ( 2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
Walker, H.M., & Severson, H. ( 1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders: Technical Manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris West .
