Chafouleas, S.M., Kilgus, S.P., & Hernandez, P. ( 2009). Using Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to screen for school social risk: A preliminary comparison of methods in a kindergarten sample . Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 214-223.
2.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & McDougal, J. ( 2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate?Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157-169.
3.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Sassu, K.A. ( 2006). Acceptability and reported use of Daily Behavior Report Cards in a sample of teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 174-182.
4.
Christ, T.J., & Boice, C.M. ( 2009). Rating scale items: A brief review of nomenclature, components and formatting to inform the development of Direct Behavior Rating. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 242-250.
5.
Christ, T.J., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Chafouleas, S.M. (2009). Foundation for the development and use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to assess and evaluate student behavior . Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 201-213.
6.
Crone, D.A., Horner, R.H., & Hawken, L.S. ( 2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. New York: Guilford .
7.
Fabiano, G.A., Vujnovic, R., Naylor, J., Summerlee, M., & Robins, M. ( 2009). An investigation of the technical adequacy of a Daily Behavior Report Card (DBRC) for monitoring progress of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in special education placements. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 231-241.
8.
Fantuzzo, J.W., Rohrbeck, C.A., & Azar, S.T. ( 1987). A component analysis of behavioral self-management interventions with elementary school students. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 9, 33-43.
9.
Glover, T.A., & Albers, C.A. ( 2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments . Journal of School Psychology, 45, 117-135.
10.
Gureasko-Moore, S.P., DuPaul, G.J., & White, G. ( 2007). Self-management of classroom preparedness and homework: Effects on school functioning of adolescents with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 36, 647-664.
11.
Hagermoser Sanetti, L.H., Chafouleas, S.M., Christ, T.J., & Gritter, K.L. ( 2009). Extending use of Direct Behavior Rating beyond student assessment: Applications to treatment integrity assessment within a multi-tier model of school-based intervention delivery. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 251-258.
12.
Hosp, M.K., Hosp, J.L., & Howell, K.W. ( 2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford .
Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools, Future of School Psychology Task Force on Family School Partnerships. (2007). Module 5: Family School Collaboration . Retrieved November 5, 2008, from http://fsp.unl.edu/module5.html
15.
Pelham, W.E., Fabiano, G.A., & Massetti, G.M. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 449-476.
16.
Public Agenda. (2004). Teaching interrupted: Do discipline policies in today’s public schools foster the common good? Retrieved September 1, 2008, from https://www.publicagenda.org
17.
Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children 2. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
18.
Riley-Tillman, T.C., Methe, S.A., & Weegar, K. ( 2009). Examining the use of Direct Behavior Rating methodology on classwide formative assessment: A case study. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 224-230.
19.
Rose, L.C., & Gallup, A.M. ( 2005). The 37th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 41-57.
20.
Shapiro, E.S., & Cole, C.L. ( 1994). Behavior change in the classroom: Self-management interventions . New York: Guilford.
21.
Shinn, M.R. ( 1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children . New York: Guilford.
22.
Shinn, M.R. ( 1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement . New York: Guilford.
23.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.