Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) is a method of social—emotional and behavior assessment that combines the immediacy of systematic direct observation and the efficiency of behavior rating scales. The purpose of this article is to discuss the defensibility and usability of DBR. This article provides a brief summary of (a) the past, present, and future directions of social— emotional and behavior assessment methods in schools; (b) the defining features of DBR; (c) the guiding principles for DBR development and evaluation; and (d) DBR research to date. Special emphasis is placed on single-item scale DBR (SIS-DBR) and three general outcome behaviors that are most relevant for use in schools. Research and recommendations for standard SIS-DBR instrumentation and procedures are reviewed, along with future directions for research and practice.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational and Psychological Research Association.
2.
Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (1999). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
3.
Briesch, A.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Schlientz, M. ( 2007). Project VIABLE technical report: A review of sources of effort in social behavior assessment. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
4.
Beaver, B.R., & Busse, R.T. ( 2000). Informant reports: Conceptual and research base of interviews with parents and teachers. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Conceptual foundations and practical applications (pp. 257-287). New York: Guilford.
5.
Cashel, M.L. ( 2002). Child and adolescent psychological assessment: Current clinical practices and the impact of managed care. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 446-453.
6.
Chafouleas, S.M., Christ, T.J., & Riley-Tillman, T.C. (2009). Generalizability and dependability of scaling gradients on direct behavior ratings. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 69, 157-173.
7.
Chafouleas, S.M., Briesch, A.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Christ, T.J., & Kilgus, S.P. ( 2009). The impact of alternative scale formats on the accuracy and generalizability of data obtained from Direct Behavior Rating. Manuscript under review.
8.
Chafouleas, S.M., Christ, T.J., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Briesch, A.M., & Chanese, J.A.M. (2007). Generalizability and dependability of Daily Behavior Report Cards to measure social behavior of preschoolers . School Psychology Review, 36, 63-79.
9.
Chafouleas, S.M., Kilgus, S.P., & Hernadez, P. ( 2009). Using Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to screen for school social risk: A preliminary comparison of methods in a kindergarten sample . Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 214-223.
10.
Chafouleas, S.M., McDougal, J.L., Riley-Tillman, T., Panahon, C.J., & Hilt, A.M. ( 2006). What do daily behavior report cards (DBRCs) measure? An initial comparison of DBRCs with direct observation for off-task behavior . Psychology in the Schools, 42, 669-676.
11.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Christ, T.J. ( 2009). Direct Behavior Rating (DBR): An emerging method for assessing social behavior within a tiered intervention system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 195-200.
12.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, R.W., Christ, T., & Briesch, A.M. ( 2008). Direct Behavior Ratings (DBRs): The impact of alternate scale formats on accuracy and generalizability. Unpublished manuscript.
13.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T., & McDougal, J.L. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate?Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157-169.
14.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Sassu, K.A. ( 2006). Acceptability and reported use of daily behavior report cards among teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 8, 174-182.
15.
Christ, T.J. ( 2008). Best practices in problem analysis. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 159-176). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists .
16.
Christ, T.J., & Boice, C.H. ( 2007). Project VIABLE technical report for Direct Behavior Rating Scales: Dimensions of scales, anchors, and labels. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota.
17.
Christ, T.J., & Boice, C.H. ( 2009). Rating scale items: A brief review of nomenclature, components and formatting to inform the development of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR). Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 242-250.
18.
Christ, T.J., Chafouleas, S.M., & Riley-Tillman, T.C. (2007). Direct Behavior Ratings Scale (DBR-S): How many points on a scale do we need? Unpublished manuscript , University of Minnesota, Minneapolis .
19.
Christ, T.J., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Chafouleas, S.M., & Boice, C.H. ( 2008). Direct Behavior Rating (DBR): Generalizability and dependability across raters and observations by facet and universe of generalization. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
Cone, J.D. ( 1978). The Behavioral Assessment Grid (BAG): A conceptual framework and taxonomy. Behavior Therapy, 9, 882-888.
21.
Demaray, M.K., Schaefer, K., & Delong, L.K. ( 2003). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A national survey of training and current assessment practices in the schools. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 583-597.
22.
Deno, S.L. ( 2005). Problem solving assessment. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach (pp. 10-42). New York: Guilford .
23.
DuPaul, G.J., Power, T.J., Anastopoulos, A.D., & Reid, R. ( 1998). ADHD Rating Scale-IV. New York: Guilford.
24.
Fabiano, G.A., Vujnovic, R., Naylor, J., Pariseau, M., & Robins, M.L. ( 2009). An investigation of the technical adequacy of a daily behavior report card (DBRC) for monitoring progress of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in special education placements. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 231-241.
25.
Goh, D.S., & Fuller, G.B. ( 1983). Current practices in the assessment of personality and behavior by school psychologists. School Psychology Review , 12, 240-243.
26.
Goh, D.S., Teslow, J., & Fuller, G.B. ( 1981). The practice of psychological assessment among school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 12, 696-706.
27.
Hintze, J.M., & Matthews, W.J. (2004). The generalizability of systematic direct observations across time and setting: A preliminary investigation of the psychometrics of behavioral observation. School Psychology Review, 33, 234-248.
28.
Hintze, J.M., Volpe, R.J., & Shapiro, E.S. ( 2008). Best practices in the systematic direct observation of student behavior. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 319-336). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
29.
Hixon, M., Christ, T.J., & Bradley-Johnson, S. (2008). Best practices in progress monitoring. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 2133-2146). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
30.
Hutton, J.B., Dubes, R., & Muir, S. ( 1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271-284.
31.
Johnston, J.M., & Pennypacker, H.S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Kazdin, A.E. ( 1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Kennedy, M.L., Faust, D., Willis, W., & Piotrowski, C. (1994). Social-emotional assessment practices in school psychology. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 228-240.
34.
Koonce, D.A. ( 2007). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder assessment practices by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 319-333.
35.
LeBel, T.J., Chafouleas, S.M., & Sugai, G.M. ( 2006). Project VIABLE technical report for Direct Behavior Rating Scales: Rationale for selection of behaviors to be investigated. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
36.
LeBel, T.J., Kilgus, S.P., Briesch, A.M., & Chafouleas, S.M. (in press). The impact of training on the accuracy of teacher-completed Direct Behavior Rating (DBR). Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
37.
LeBel, T.J., Kilgus, S.P., Riley-Tillman, T., & Schlientz, M. ( 2006). Project VIABLE technical report for Direct Behavior Rating scales: Training and accuracy. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
38.
McCaffery, M., & Beebe, A. ( 1993). Pain: Clinical manual for nursing practice. Baltimore, MD: Mosby.
39.
Merrell, K.W. ( 2000). Informant reports: Theory and research in using child behavior rating scales in school settings. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Conceptual foundations and practical applications (pp. 233-256). New York: Guilford.
40.
National Institutes of Health. (2007). Pain intensity scales . NIH: Bethesda, MD. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://painconsortium.nih.gov/pain_scales/index.html
41.
Pelham, W.E., Jr., Fabiano, G.A., & Massetti, G.M. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 449-476.
42.
Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
43.
Riley-Tillman, T.C., Chafouleas, S.M., Briesch, A.M., Eckert, T.L. ( 2008). Daily Behavior Report Cards and Systematic Direct Observation: An investigation of the acceptability, reported training and use, and decision reliability among school psychologists. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 313-327.
44.
Riley-Tillman, T.C., Chafouleas, S.M., Christ, T.J., Briesch, A.M., & LeBel, T.J. (2009). The impact of item wording and behavioral specificity on the accuracy of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) . School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 1-12.
45.
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J.E., & Bolt, S. ( 2006). Assessment: In special and inclusive education (10th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
46.
Satcher, D. ( 1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Retrieved November 10, 2008, from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/home.html
47.
Sattler, J.M. ( 1998). Clinical and forensic interviewing of children and families: Guidelines for the mental health, education, pediatric, and child maltreatment fields. San Diego, CA: Sattler.
48.
Schlientz, M.D., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Briesch, A.M., Walcott, C.M., & Chafouleas, S.M. (in press). The impact of training on the accuracy of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR). School Psychology Quarterly .
49.
Shapiro, E.S., & Clemens, N.H. ( 2005). Conducting systematic direct classroom observations to define school-related problems. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach (pp. 175-199). New York: Guilford.
50.
Shapiro, E.S., & Heick, P.F. ( 2004). School psychologist assessment practices in the evaluation of students referred for social/ behavioral/emotional problems. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 551-561.
51.
Skinner, C.H., Dittmer, K.I., & Howell, K.W. ( 2000). Direct observation in school settings. In E. S. Shapiro & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Conceptual foundations and practical applications (pp. 16-46). New York: Guilford.
52.
Stinnett, T.A., Havey, J., & Oehler-Stinnett, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331-350.
53.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. ( 2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23-50.
54.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. ( 2006) (invited paper). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining the implementation of school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245-259.
55.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. ( 1984). Single subject research in special education. New York: Merrill.
56.
Tilly, W.D., III ( 2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice: Problem solving and the three-tiered model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 17-36). Bethesda, MD : National Association of School Psychologists.
57.
Wilson, M.S., & Reschly, D.J. ( 1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice . School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.
58.
Wong, D., & Whaley, L. (Eds.). (1986). Clinical handbook of pediatric nursing (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
