Assessment for Eligibility Under IDEIA and the 2006 Regulations

Abstract

In this article, the authors briefly examine the legal requirements for assessing students' eligibility for special education services. They then analyze the major changes regarding assessment for eligibility determination in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) passed in 2004 and the regulations implementing the law, published in August 2006. (See the appendix for a description of the changes in IDEIA regarding eligibility determination; these changes are significant and will alter the ways in which school-based teams conduct the eligibility determination process.) Finally, they analyze school districts' obligations under IDEIA and provide suggestions for ensuring that the eligibility process is both educationally appropriate and legally correct. Because individual states will need to align their special education rules and regulations to those of IDEIA, readers will need to monitor developments in their respective states to determine how the new provisions will affect local school districts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Batsche, G.M. , Kavale, K.A. , & Kovaleski, J.F. (2006). Competing views: A dialogue on response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention , 32, 6—20.

Brown-Chidsey, R. , & Steege, M.W. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1975)

Good, R. , Simmons, D. , & Smith, S. (1998). Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. School Psychology Review, 27, 45—56.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)(amended 1997)

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)(reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)

Kavale, K. (2002). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley , L. Danielson , & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 370— 371). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Letter to Barnett, 18 IDELR 1235 (OSEP 1992).

10.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002)

11.

President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2001). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Retrieved July 8, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/commissionsboards/whspecialeducation/index.html

12.

Reschly, D.J. (2000). Assessment and eligibility determination in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997. In C. F. Telzrow & M. Tankersly (Eds.), IDEA amendments of 1997: Practice guidelines for school-based teams (pp. 65—104). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

13.

Scruggs, T.E. , & Mastropieri, M.A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155—168.

14.

U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities, 71 Fed. Reg. 156 (August 14, 2006) (to be codified at 34 C.F.R § 300). Available at http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/finrule/2006-3/081406a.html