Burns, M.K., Tilly, W.D., III., Gresham, F.M., Telzrow, C.F., Shapiro, E.S., & Kovaleski, J.F. (2006). Response-to-intervention debate: Using data over dogma. Communiqué, 34(7), 5-6.
2.
Burns, M.K., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2005). Questions about response-to-intervention implementation: Seeking answers from existing models. CaliforniaSchool Psychologist, 10, 9—20.
3.
Chamberlin, J. (2005). A learning disability dialogue. Monitor on Psychology, 36, 58—59.
4.
Donovan, M.S., & Cross, C.T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157—171.
6.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204—219.
7.
Gresham, F. (2001, August). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Learning Disabilities Summit: Building a Foundation for the Future, Washington DC.
8.
Gresham, F.M., Reschly, D., Tilly, W.D., Iii.J., Fletcher, M.K., Burns, T., Christ, , et al. (2004). Comprehensive evaluation of learning disabilities: A response-to-intervention perspective . Communiqué , 33(4), 34—35.
9.
Hale, J.B., Naglieri, J.A., Kaufman, A.S., & Kavale, K.A. (2004, Winter). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist, 58(1), 6-13.
10.
Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
Kennedy, M.M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4—12.
12.
Marston, D., Canter, A., Lau, M., & Muyskens, P. (2005). Empirical versus illusory evidence. Communiqué, 34(3), 28—30.
13.
Naglieri, J.A., & Crockett, D.P. (2005). Response to intervention (RTI): Is it a scientifically proven method?Communiqué, 34(2), 38—39.
14.
Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R.H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137—148.
15.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2001). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16.
Tilly, D.W., III, Rahn-Blakeslee, A., Grimes, J., Gruba, J., Allison, R., Stumme, J., et al. (2005). It's not about us, folks: It's about the kids. Communiqué, 34(3), 27—28.
17.
VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., & Barnett, D.A. (2005). The emergence and possible futures of response to intervention. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 339—361.
18.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137—146.
19.
Ysseldyke, J.E. (2005). Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: What if this is as good as it gets?Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 125—128.