AcedoF. J.BarrosoC.CasanuevaC.GalánJ. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
2.
AdamsR. J.SmartP.HuffA. S. (2017). Shades of grey: Guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102
3.
AlagarajaM. (2014). A conceptual model of organizations as learning-performance systems: Integrative review of lean implementation literature. Human Resource Development Review, 13(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484313495852
4.
AndersonV. (2015). International HRD and offshore outsourcing: A conceptual review and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315598493
BartlettK. R.MadsenS. R.ValesanoM.FengY. (2022). Asilomar: A historical study of the role of the YWCA in women’s leadership development as an absent narrative in the history of HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 21(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221086189
7.
BeigiM.ShirmohammadiM.StewartJ. (2018). Flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies among academics. Human Resource Development Review, 17(3), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318787628
8.
BieremaL. L.CallahanJ. L.ElliottC. J.GreerT. W.CollinsJ. C. (2023). Human resource development: Critical perspectives and practices. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429280009
9.
BjorkmanI.EhrnroothM.MakelaK.SmaleA.SumeliusJ. (2014). From HRM practices to the practice of HRM: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(2), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-02-2014-0008
10.
BlackmanA.MoscardoG.GrayD. E. (2016). Challenges for the theory and practice of business coaching: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316673177
11.
BoyackK. W.SmallH.KlavansR. (2013). Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1759–1767. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22896
12.
BrannanM. J.FleetwoodS.O’MahoneyJ.VincentS. (2017). Critical essay: Meta-analysis: A critical realist critique and alternative. Human Relations, 70(1), 11–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716674063
13.
BurkeC. M.MorleyM. J. (2016). On temporary organizations: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Human relations, 69(6), 1235–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715610809
14.
Calero MedinaC. M.LeeuwenT. (2012). Seed journal citation network maps: A method based on network theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1226–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22631
15.
CallahanJ. L. (2010). Constructing a manuscript: Distinguishing integrative literature reviews and conceptual and theory articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371492
16.
CallonM.CourtialJ.-P.TurnerW. A.BauinS. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
17.
ChaudhuriS.ParkS.KimS. (2019). The changing landscape of women’s leadership in India and Korea from cultural and generational perspectives. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 16–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318809753
ChoY.Marshall EganT. (2009). Action learning research: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 8(4), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309345656
20.
ChoudhuryP.AllenR. T.EndresM. G. (2021). Machine learning for pattern discovery in management research. Strategic Management Journal, 42(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3215
21.
CollinsJ. C. (2012). Identity matters: A critical exploration of lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity and leadership in HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 11(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312446810
22.
CollinsJ. C.McFaddenC.RoccoT. S.MathisM. K. (2015). The problem of transgender marginalization and exclusion: Critical actions for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 14(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315581755
23.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2020). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
CrenshawK. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In FinemanM. A. (Ed.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). Routledge.
25.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
26.
ElsbachK. D.van KnippenbergD. (2020). Creating high-impact literature reviews: An Argument for ‘integrative reviews. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12581
27.
FanD.BreslinD.CallahanJ. L.Iszatt-WhiteM. (2022). Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291
28.
FilatotchevI.IrelandR. D.StahlG. K. (2022). Contextualizing management research: An open systems perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 1036–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12754
GaravanT.McCarthyA.LaiY.MurphyK.SheehanM.CarberyR. (2021). Training and organisational performance: A meta-analysis of temporal, institutional and organisational context moderators. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12284
31.
GaravanT.WangJ.NolanC.LaiY.O’BrienF.DarcyC.Matthews-SmithG.McLeanG. (2023). Putting the individual and context back into national human resource development research: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12308
32.
GaravanT. N.McCarthyA.CarberyR. (2019). An ecosystems perspective on international human resource development: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Human Resource Development Review, 18(2), 248–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828865
33.
HallP. A.SoskiceD. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. OUP Oxford.
34.
HamlinB.StewartJ. (2011). What is HRD? A definitional review and synthesis of the HRD domain. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111120377
35.
HanS.ChaeC.HanS. J.YoonS. W. (2017). Conceptual organization and identity of HRD: Analyses of evolving definitions, influence, and connections. Human Resource Development Review, 16(3), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317719822
36.
HicksonD. J.HiningsC. R.LeeC. A.SchneckR. E.PenningsJ. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies' theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391831
37.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
38.
HoltonE. F.TorracoR. J. (2004). Welcoming meta-analysis and emerging ideas to HRDR. Human Resource Development Review, 3(2), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304265747
39.
HuarngK. H.Rey-MartíA.Miquel-RomeroM. J. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis in business. Journal of Business Research, 89, 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.032
40.
JarzabkowskiP.Paul SpeeA. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00250.x
41.
JohnsonK. R.Ennis-ColeD.BonhamgregoryM. (2020). Workplace success Strategies for employees with autism Spectrum Disorder: A new Frontier for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 19(2), 122–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320905910
42.
JonesO.GatrellC.JonesO. C. (2014). Editorial: The future of writing and reviewing for scp IJMR scp. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12038
43.
JuB.LeeY.ParkS.YoonS. W. (2021). A meta-Analytic review of the relationship between learning organization and organizational performance and employee attitudes: Using the dimensions of learning organization questionnaire. Human Resource Development Review, 20(2), 207–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320987363
KimS. (2019). Workaholism, motivation, and addiction in the workplace: A critical review and implications for HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 18(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319845164
KuchinkeK. P. (2023). Grounding and deepening academic writing in human resource development: The role of selecting and representing the supporting literature. Human Resource Development Review, 22(3), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231183194
48.
LeeM. M. (2014). Dilemmas in defining HRD. In ChalofskyN. E.RoccoT. S.MorrisM. L. (Eds.), Handbook of human resource development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118839881.ch6
49.
LochmillerC. R.ChoY.LesterJ. N. (2023). A new Design framework for Innovative qualitative research in HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 22(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231170414
50.
LundgrenH.PoellR. F. (2016). On critical reflection: A review of Mezirow’s theory and its Operationalization. Human Resource Development Review, 15(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315622735
McLeanG. N.McLeanL. (2001). If we can't define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context?Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110059339
53.
NellenL. C.GijselaersW. H.GrohnertT. (2020). A meta-analytic literature review on organization-level drivers of team learning. Human Resource Development Review, 19(2), 152–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319894756
54.
O’KaneP.OttD. L.SmithA. D.BrownT. C. (2023). Understanding Computer-Assisted qualitative data analysis Software as a Tool to enhance systematic literature reviews in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 22(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221144668
55.
PalmatierR. W.HoustonM. B.HullandJ. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4
56.
ParéG.TrudelM. C.JaanaM.KitsiouS. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
57.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The External Control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
58.
PratoomK. (2018). Differential relationship of person- and task-focused leadership to team effectiveness: A meta-analysis of moderators. Human Resource Development Review, 17(4), 393–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318790167
59.
RaginC. C. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative Strategies (p. 185). University of California Press.
60.
RascaroliL. (2017). How the essay Film Thinks. Oxford University Press.
61.
RoccoT. S.PlakhotnikM. S.SilbermanD. (2022). Differentiating between conceptual and theory articles: Focus, goals, and approaches. Human Resource Development Review, 21(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211069795
62.
SamnaniS. S.VaskaM.AhmedS.TurinT. C. (2017). Review typology: The basic types of reviews for synthesizing evidence for the purpose of knowledge translation. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons-Pakistan: JCPSP, 27(10), 635–641.
63.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
64.
SchatzkiT. (2017). Practices and learning. Practice theory perspectives on pedagogy and education: Praxis, diversity and contestation (pp. 23–43). Springer.
65.
SeoG.HuangW.HanS.-H. C. (2017). Conceptual review of underrepresentation of women in senior leadership positions from a perspective of gendered social status in the workplace: Implication for HRD research and practice. Human Resource Development Review, 16(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317690063
66.
SeoJ.LeeS.ArdichviliA. (2021). How is HRD related to other disciplines? The analysis of 100 most frequently cited empirical articles published in three HRD journals. European Journal of Training and Development, 45(4/5), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2020-0108
ShuckB.WollardK. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A Seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309353560
69.
SimE.JeongS. (2023). Mapping the future of intersectional research in human resource development: An integrated literature review. Human Resource Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231205066
70.
SmithI. A.GriffithsA. (2022). Microaggressions, everyday discrimination, workplace incivilities, and other subtle slights at work: A meta-synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 21(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221098756
71.
ThomasN. J.BaralR.CroccoO. S. (2022). Gamification for HRD: Systematic review and future research directions. Human Resource Development Review, 21(2), 198–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221074859
72.
TkachenkoO.ArdichviliA. (2017). Cultural-historical activity Theory’s relevance to HRD: A review and application. Human Resource Development Review, 16(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317696717
73.
TkachenkoO.CroccoO. S.NguyenL. A.JonathanV. (2022). Regional human resource development in ASEAN: An institutional theory perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 21(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221083190
74.
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-Informed management knowledge by Means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
75.
ÜsdikenB.PasadeosY. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A comparison of Co-citation networks. Organization Studies, 16(3), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306
76.
Van de VenA. H.JingR. (2012). Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00281.x
Van de VenA. H.MeyerA.JingR.2018. Opportunities and challenges of engaged indigenous scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 14(3), 449–462, https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2018.28
79.
Von KroghG.HaefligerS.SpaethS.WallinM. W. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS quarterly, 649–676.
WoodsideA. G.KoE.HuanT. C. (2012). The new logic in building isomorphic theory of management decision realities. Management Decision, 50(5), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227429
82.
YawsonR. M. (2013). Systems theory and thinking as a foundational theory in human resource development—a Myth or reality?Human Resource Development Review, 12(1), 53–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312461634
83.
YoonS. W.ChaeC. (2022). Research topics and collaboration in human resource development review 2012–2021: A bibliometrics approach. Human Resource Development Review, 21(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211068807