ChangH.NgunjiriF.HernandezK. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Routledge.
3.
ChoY.GrenierR.WilliamsP. (2022). Introduction: Innovation in qualitative research in HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(7/8), 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-05-2022-0058
4.
de CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
5.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
6.
FieldingN. G.LeeR. M.BlankG. (Eds.), (2008). The SAGE handbook of online research methods. SAGE.
7.
GibsonS. K.HanesL. A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 2(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303002002005
8.
GithensR. P. (2015). Critical action research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 14(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315581934
9.
GrenierR.CollinsJ. (2016). “Man, have I got a story for you”: Facilitated autoethnography as a potential research methodology in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 15(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316656658
10.
HoltonE. F.III. (2003). Where are the theory-building research methods articles?Human Resource Development Review, 2(3), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303257107
11.
KozinetsR. (2020). Netnography. The essential guide to qualitative social media research. Sage.
12.
LesterJ. N.O’ReillyM. (2015). Is evidence-based practice a threat to the progress of the qualitative community? Arguments from the bottom of the pyramid. Quintessence International, 21(7), 628–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563808
13.
LesterJ. N.WongY. J.O’ReillyM.KiyimbaN. (2018). Discursive psychology: Implications for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(5), 576–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018780462
14.
LesterJ. NChoY.LockmillerC. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890
15.
LesterJ. N. (2021). Relational engagements with post-qualitative inquiry: There are no blank pages. Quintessence International, 27(2), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420931133
MorseJ. (2020). The changing face of qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920909938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920909938
18.
NindN.CoverdaleA.MeckinR. (2021). Changing social research practices in the context of COVID-19: Rapid evidence review. National Centre for Research Methods.
19.
O’ReillyM.KiyimbaN. (2015). Advanced qualitative research: A guide to using theory. SAGE.
20.
PaulusT. M.LesterJ. N. (2022). Doing qualitative research in a digital world. SAGE.
21.
RahmanS. A.TuckermanL.VorleyT.GherhesC. (2021). Resilient research in the field: Insights and lessons from adapting qualitative research projects during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211016106. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211016106
22.
ReioT. G.Jr. (2010). The ongoing quest for theory-building research methods articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 223–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371448
23.
TaylorC.CoffeyA. (2009). Editorial—special issue: Qualitative research and methodological innovation. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 523–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109350355
Vindrola-PadrosC.ChisnallG.CooperS.DowrickA.DjellouliN.SymmonsS. M.SingletonG.VanderslottS.VeraN.JohnsonG. A. (2020). Carrying out rapid qualitative research during a pandemic: Emerging lessons from COVID-19. Qualitative Health Research, 30(14), 2192–2204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951526