BaileyC.YeomanR.MaddenA.ThompsonM.KerridgeG. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318804653
2.
BrinerR. B.DenyerD. (2010). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In RousseauD. (Ed.), Handbook of evidenced-based management: Companies, classrooms, and research (pp. 328–347). Oxford University Press.
3.
CallahanJ. L. (2010). Constructing a manuscript: Distinguishing integrative literature reviews and conceptual and theory articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371492
4.
CallahanJ. L. (2014). Writing literature reviews: A reprise and update. Human Resource Development Review, 13(3), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314536705
ChoY.EganT. M. (2009). Action learning research: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 8(4), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309345656
7.
GarrardJ. (2007). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method. Jones & Bartlett.
8.
HanS.ChaeC.HanS. J.YoonS. W. (2017). Conceptual organization and identity of HRD: Analyses of evolving definitions, influence, and connections. Human Resource Development Review, 18(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317719822
9.
HitchcockJ. H.NewmanI. (2012). Applying an interactive quantitative-qualitative framework: How identifying common intent can enhance inquiry. Human Resource Development Review, 12(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312462127
10.
HoltonE. F.III. (2002). The mandate for theory in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484302011001
11.
McDonaldK. S.HiteL. M. (2018). Conceptualizing and creating sustainable careers. Human Resource Development Review, 17(4), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318796318
12.
NewmanI.HitchcockJ. H. (2011). Underlying agreements between quantitative and qualitative research: The short and tall of it all. Human Resource Development Review, 10(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311413867
13.
StewartJ.SambrookS. (2012). The historical development of human resource development in the United Kingdom. Human Resource Development Review, 11(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312454118
14.
TorracoR. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
15.
TorracoR. J.LundgrenH. (2020). What HRD is doing—What HRD should be doing: The case for transforming HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319877058
16.
Wiggins-RomesburgC. A.GithensR. P. (2018). The psychology of diversity resistance and integration. Human Resource Development Review, 17(2), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318765843