CallahanJ. L. (2010). Reconstructing, constructing, and deconstructing the field: The importance of historical manuscripts in HRDR. Human Resource Development Review, 9(4), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310379956
3.
ClarkP.RowlinsonM. (2004). The treatment of history in organisation studies: Towards an ‘historic turn’?Business History, 46(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007679042000219175
4.
HoltonE. F.III. (2002). The mandate for theory in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484302011001
5.
LawrenceB. S. (1984). Historical perspective: Using the past to study the present. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/258443
6.
McLeanG. N. (2016). Personal reflections: The value of a history of the academy, personally and professionally. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(4), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422316660149
7.
MillsA. J.SuddabyR.FosterW. M.DureposG. (2016). Re-visiting the historic turn 10 years later: Current debates in management and organizational history—An introduction. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2016.1164927
ShortD. C. (2016). HRD scholars who laid the foundations of HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422316659900
StewartJ.SambrookS. (2012). The historical development of human resource development in the United Kingdom. Human Resource Development Review, 11(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312454118
12.
WatkinsK. E. (2016). A history of the academy of human resource development: An introduction. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(4), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422316659884
13.
AlagarajaM.DooleyL. M. (2003). Origins and historical influences on human resource development: A global perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 2(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303251170
14.
AndersonV. (2017). HRD standards and standardization: Where now for human resource development?Human Resource Development International, 20(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1321872
15.
BieremaL. L. (2009). Critiquing human resource development’s dominant masculine rationality and evaluating its impact. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 68–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484308330020
16.
BonebrightD. A. (2010). 40 Years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678861003589099
17.
BridgmanT.CummingsS.BallardJ. (2019). Who built Maslow’s pyramid? A history of the creation of management studies’ most famous symbol and its implications for management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0351
18.
BrookC. (2020). An instrument of social action: Revans’ learning disabilities project (1969 -1972) in a politico-historical context. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 17(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2020.1818181
19.
BurnsB. (2007). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306297004
20.
ChoY.LimD. H.ParkC. (2015). The evolution of Korean corporate HRD: Launching, growing pains, and transforming. Human Resource Development International, 18(5), 464–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1079293
21.
HanS.ChaeC.HanS. J.YoonS. W. (2017). Conceptual organization and identity of HRD: Analyses of evolving definitions, influence, and connections. Human Resource Development Review, 16(3), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317719822
22.
HassardJ. (2012). Rethinking the Hawthorne Studies: The Western Electric research in its social, political and historical context. Human Relations, 65(11), 1431-1461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712452168
23.
HatcherT. (2013). Robert Owen: A historiographic study of a pioneer of human resource development. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(4), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311319799
24.
KuchinkeK. P. (2007). Birds of a feather? The critique of the North American business school and its implications for educating HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development Review, 6(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307300175
25.
PerritonL. (2017). The parochial realm, social enterprise and gender: The work of Catherine Cappe and Faith Gray and others in York, 1780-1820. Business History, 59(2), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2016.1175438
26.
Russ-EftD.ShortD.JacobsR. L. (2014). Perspectives in HRD—The Academy of Human Resource Development: Its history and current activities. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 26(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20055
27.
Storberg-WalkerJ.BieremaL. L. (2008). An historical analysis of HRD knowledge: A critical review of “The foreman: Master and victim of doubletalk”. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(6), 433–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090590810886553
28.
ToseyP.MarshallJ. (2017). The demise of inquiry-based HRD programmes in the UK: Implications for the field. Human Resource Development International, 20(5), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1329368
29.
WheelockL. D.CallahanJ. L. (2006). Mary Parker Follett: A rediscovered voice informing the field of human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 5(2), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484306287258
30.
ArgyresN. S.De MassisA.FossN. J.FrattiniF.JonesG.SilvermanB. S. (2020). History-informed strategy research: The promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3118
31.
DureposG.MillsA. J. (2011). Actor network theory, ANTi-History, and critical organizational historiography. Organization, 19(6), 703-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411420196
32.
LavertyS. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200303
33.
MacleanM.HarveyC.CleggS. R. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0133
34.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ.DeckerS. (2014). Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 250–274.
VaaraE.LambergJ.-A. (2016). Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 633–657.
37.
WeatherbeeT. G.DureposG.MillsA. J.HelmsM. J. (2012). Theorizing the past: Critical engagements. Management & Organizational History, 7(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935912444358