GoughD.ThomasJ.OliverS. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1, Article 28. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-28 [Discusses reviews as a topic].
2.
MunnZ.PetersM.SternC.TufanaruC.McArthurA.AromatarisE. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
3.
RoccoT. S.PlakhotnikM. S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 120-130.
4.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
5.
CallahanJ. L. (2010). Constructing a manuscript: Distinguishing integrative literature reviews and conceptual and theory articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9, 300-304. doi:10.1177/1534484310371492
6.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367. doi:10.1177/1534484305278283
7.
TorracoR. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15, 404-428.
8.
BoothA.PapaioannouD.SuttonA. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
9.
CampbellA.TaylorB.BatesJ.O’Connor-BonesU. (2018). Developing and applying a protocol for a systematic review in the social sciences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(1), 1-22. doi:10.1080/13614533.2017.1281827 [This article is especially in-depth covering the search of a systematic review]
DavisJ.MengersenK.BennettS.MazerolleL. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, Article 511. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-511
