AndersonV. (2017). Criteria for evaluating qualitative research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28, 125-133. doi: 10.1001/hrdq.21282
2.
AnnesleyT. (2013). Writing an effective manuscript review: The 6 “Be’s” to success. Clinical Chemistry, 59, 1028-1035. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.208280
3.
BedeianA. G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 198-216.
4.
BenosD. J.KirkK. L.HallJ. E. (2003). How to review a paper. Advances in Physiology Education, 27, 47-52.
5.
NicolD.ThomsonA.BreslinC. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 102-122.
6.
NimonK. (2017). HRDQ submissions of quantitative research reports: Three common comments in decision letters and a checklist. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28, 281-298. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21290
7.
ReioT. G.WernerJ. M. (2017). Publishing mixed methods research: Thoughts and recommendations concerning rigor, 28, 439-449. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21291
8.
SealsD. R.TanakaH. (2000). Manuscript peer review: A helpful checklist for students and novice referees. Advances in Physiology Education, 23, 52-58.
9.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367.
