Is there a need for irreverence in our field? This article lays out a case for what the author calls “transformational irreverence” and also “reverence” in our work, along with some approaches to encourage them.
AsimovI. (1977). Foreword: The role of the heretic. In GoldsmithD. (Ed.), Scientists confront Velikovsky (pp. 7-15). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (1st Midland Book ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
BatchelorS. (2015). The faith to doubt: Glimpses of Buddhist uncertainty (New ed.). Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint Press.
BrittonC. (2004). Breaking the Rules: Irrelevance/Irreverence in Maryse Condé’s Traversée de la mangrove. French Cultural Studies, 15, 35-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957155804040407
6.
ChermackT. J.SwansonR. A. (2015). When methodologies become theologies, applied disciplines falter. Human Resource Development Review, 14, 509-513. doi:10.1177/1534484315614156
7.
DysonF. J. (2006). The scientist as rebel. New York: New York Review Books.
8.
EhrenreichB. (2007). Dancing in the streets: A history of collective joy (1st ed.). New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
9.
GansH. (1976). TV comedy’s new irreverence. Social Policy, 7, 58-59.
10.
HamelG. (2000). WHY…it’s better to question answers than answer questions. Across the Board, 37, 42.
11.
HarmanO. S.DietrichM. R. (2008). Rebels, mavericks, and heretics in biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
HeschelA. J. (1979). Man is not alone: A philosophy of religion. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Young. (Original work published 1951)
14.
KleinerA. (2008). The age of heretics: A history of the radical thinkers who reinvented corporate management (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
KorteR. (2016). From methodology to imagination. Human Resource Development Review, 15, 123-126. doi:10.1177/1534484316628353
16.
KrothM. (February, 2016). To revere or to irrevere: That is not the question. 2016 AHRD International Research Conference in the Americas Conference Proceedings, Jacksonville, FL.
17.
MachamerP. K.PeraM.BaltasA. S. (2000). Scientific controversies: Philosophical and historical perspectives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
McLeanG. N. (2010). Human resource development scholar as rebel. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 317-320. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20056
NorquayN. (1999). Who rebels? Gender and class in stories of irreverence and resistance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12, 417-431. doi:10.1080/095183999236060
21.
SouthworthJ. (1998). Fools and jesters at the English court. Stroud, UK: Sutton.
22.
SwiftJ. (2007). A modest proposal and other satires. Stilwell, KS: Digireads.com.
23.
Webster’s collegiate dictionary (5th ed.). (1941). Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Co.
