In recent years, a growing body of literature has emerged from the intersection of complex systems science and organizational communication. However, due to the incoherence and immaturity of complexity science, this body of research is slightly disorganized. This article explores this research node using a meta-paradigmatic framework to untangle and clarify the different paradigmatic assumptions in the field of organizational communication research that has adopted the complexity science perspective. Our analysis reveals five research clusters that differ from each other in their understanding of what complexity is and in how they define communication. Based on our analysis, we present suggestions for finding common ground and point the way towards a future research agenda in complexity-based research in the areas of organizational communication and human resource development (HRD). In addition, we discuss the implications and possibilities that the complexity perspective can offer for HRD in practice.
AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149. doi:10.1177/0018726700539002
2.
AndrianiP. (2011). Complexity and innovation. In AllenP.MaguireS.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 454-470). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
AulaP. (1996). Chaos and the double function of communication. In SulisW.CombsA. (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 191-206). Singapore: World Scientific.
4.
AulaP. (1999). Chaos, communication and cultural change: Beyond the management of organization. In LissackM.GunzH. (Eds.), Managing complexity in organizations (pp. 180-196). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
5.
AulaP.MantereS. (2013). Making and breaking sense: An inquiry into the reputation change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26, 340-352. doi:10.1108/09534811311328380
6.
AulaP.SiiraK. (2007). Towards social complexity view on conflict, communication, and leadership. In HazyJ. K.GoldsteinJ. A.LichtensteinB. B. (Eds.), Complex systems leadership theory (pp. 367-384). Boston, MA: ISCE Publishing.
7.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Anchor.
8.
BloomJ. W. (2001). Discourse, cognition, and chaotic systems: An examination of students’ argument about density. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 447-492.
9.
BoisotM.ChildJ. (1999). Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China. Organization Science, 10, 237-252. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.237
10.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34. doi:10.2307/2393807
11.
BurnesB. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 73-90. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
12.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London, England: Heinemann.
ByrneD. (2011). Exploring organizational effectiveness: The value of complex realism as a frame of reference and systematic comparison as a method. In AllenP.MaguireS.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 131-141). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
CilliersP. (2000). Knowledge, complexity, and understanding. Emergence, 2, 7-13. doi:10.1207/S15327000EM0204_03
17.
CohenI. B. (1994). Interactions: Some contacts between the natural sciences and the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
ContractorN. S. (1994). Self-organizing systems perspective in the study of organizational communication. In KovacicB. (Ed.), New approaches to organizational communication (pp. 39-65). Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
ContractorN. S. (1999). Self-organizing systems research in the social sciences: Reconciling the metaphors and the models. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 154-166. doi:10.1177/0893318999131009
20.
ContractorN. S.GrantS. (1996). The emergence of shared interpretations in organizations: A self-organizing systems perspective. In WattJ.VanLearA. (Eds.), Cycles and dynamic processes in communication processes (pp. 216-230). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
21.
CormanS. R.KuhnT.McPheeR.DooleyK. (2002). Studying complex discursive systems: Centering resonance analysis of communication. Human Communication Research, 28, 157-206. doi:10.1093/hcr/28.2.157
22.
CunliffeA. L. (2011). Crafting qualitative research: Morgan and Smircich 30 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 647-673. doi:10.1177/1094428110373658
23.
DamasioA. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
24.
DanekeG. A. (2005). The reluctant resurrection: New complexity methods and old systems theories. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 89-106. doi:10.1081/PAD-200044569
25.
DewulfA.GrayB.PutnamL.LewickiR.AartsN.BouwenR.van WoerkumC. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62, 155-193. doi:10.1177/0018726708100356
26.
DooleyK.CormanS. R.McPheeR.KuhnT. (2003). Modeling high-resolution broadband discourse in complex adaptive systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 7, 61-85.
27.
EpsteinJ. M.AxtellR. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
EveR. A.HorsfallS.LeeM. E. (1997). Chaos, complexity, and sociology: Myths, models, and theories. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
EyoangG. H. (2011). Complexity and the dynamics of organizational change. In AllenP.MaguireS.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 317-332). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
FordJ. E. (1999). Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 480-500. doi:10.1108/09534819910300855
31.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
32.
GilpinD. R.MurphyP. J. (2008). Crisis management in a complex world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
GioiaD. A.PitreE. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. The Academy of Management Review, 15, 584-602. doi:10.2307/258683
34.
GradousD. B. (1989). Systems theory applied to human resource development (Theory-to-practice monograph). Alexandria, VA: ASTD.
35.
GregsonR. A. M.GuastelloS. J. (2011). Introduction to nonlinear dynamical systems analysis. In GuastelloS. J.GregsonR. A. M. (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamical systems analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data (pp. 1-16). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
36.
HawesL. C. (1999). Dialogics, posthumanist theory, and self-organizing systems. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 146-153. doi:10.1177/0893318999131008
37.
HazyJ. K.AshleyA. (2011). Unfolding the future: Bifurcation in organizing form and emergence in social systems. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 13, 58-80.
38.
HazyJ. K.BackströmT. (2013). Human interaction dynamics (HID): Foundations, definitions, and directions. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 15, 91-111.
39.
HedströmP.YlikoskiP. (2011). Analytical sociology. In JarvieI. C.Zamora-BonillaJ. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of the philosophy of social sciences (pp. 386-398). London, England: SAGE.
40.
HempelC. G. (1977). Formulation and formalization of scientific theories. In SuppeF. (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed., pp. 244-265). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
41.
HerrmannA. F. (2013). Kierkegaard and indirect communication: Theorizing HRD, organizational socialization, and edification. Human Resource Development Review, 12, 345-363. doi:10.1177/1534484313482463
42.
HeylighenF. (2008). Complexity and self-organization. In BatesM. J.NilesM.TaylorM. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed., pp. 1-20). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
43.
HeylighenF.CilliersP.GershensonC. (2007). Philosophy and complexity. In BoggJ.GeyerR. (Eds.), Complexity, science and society (pp. 117-134). Oxford, UK: Radcliffe Publishing.
44.
HodgsonG. M. (2007). Institutions and individuals: Interaction and evolution. Organization Studies, 28, 95-116. doi:10.1177/0170840607067832
45.
HoffmanR. (2008). Exploring the link between uncertainty and organizing processes: Complexity science insights for communication scholars. Communication Theory, 18, 426-447. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00329.x
46.
IlesP.YollesM. (2003). Complexity, HRD and organisation development: Towards a viable systems approach to learning, development and change. In LeeM. (Ed.), HRD in a complex world, studies in human resource development (pp. 25-41). London, England: Routledge.
47.
IsbellM. J. (2009, November). Conversational chaos: Order and complexity in everyday conversations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago Hilton & Towers, IL.
48.
JacobsR. L. (2014). System theory and HRD. In ChalofskyN. E.RoccoT. S.MorrisM. L. (Eds.), Handbook of human resource development (pp. 21-39). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
49.
JuarreroA. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Emergence, 2, 24-57. doi:10.1207/S15327000EM0202_03
50.
KauffmanS. A. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
KielL. D.ElliottE. (1996). Chaos theory in the social sciences: Foundations and applications. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
52.
KocheryT. S. (1993). Conflict versus consensus: Processes and their effect on team decision making. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4, 185-191. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920040208
53.
KristiansenM. (2013). Dynamics between organisational change processes and facilitating dissensus in context inquiring dialogues. International Journal of Action Research, 9, 95-123.
54.
LeeuwisC.AartsN. (2011). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension, 17, 21-36. doi:10.1080/1389224X.2011.536344
55.
LeticheH. (2000). Phenomenal complexity theory as informed by Bergson. Organizational Change Management, 13, 545-557. doi:10.1108/09534810010378579
56.
LevinthalD. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43, 934-950. doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934
57.
LichtensteinB. M.McKelveyB. (2004, August).Complexity science and computational models of emergent order: What’s there? What’s missing. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
58.
LiuB. F.FraustinoJ. D. (2014). Beyond image repair: Suggestions for crisis communication theory development. Public Relations Review, 40, 543-546. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.04.004
59.
LoewenbergerP. (2013). The role of HRD in stimulating, supporting, and sustaining creativity and innovation. Human Resource Development Review, 12, 422-455. doi:10.1177/1534484313494088
60.
LuhmanJ. T.BojeD. M. (2001). What is complexity science? A possible answer from narrative research. Emergence, 3, 158-168. doi:10.1207/S15327000EM0301_10
61.
MaguireS. (2011). Constructing and appreciating complexity. In AllenP.MaguireS.MckelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 79-92). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
62.
MaguireS.MckelveyB. (1999). Complexity and management: Moving from fad to firm foundations. Emergence, 1, 19-61. doi:10.1207/s15327000em0102_3
63.
MaguireS.McKelveyB.MirabeauL.ÖztasN. (2006). Complexity science and organization studies. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT.NordW. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 165-214). London, England: SAGE.
64.
MckelveyB. (1999). Complexity theory in organization science: Seizing the promise or becoming a fad? Bottom-up organization science. Emergence, 1, 5-32.
65.
MingersJ. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information System Research, 12, 240-259. doi:10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709
66.
MitchellM. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67.
Mitleton-KellyE. (2003). Ten principles of complexity & enabling infrastructures. In Mitleton-KellyE. (Ed.), Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organisations: The application of complexity theory to organisations (pp. 21-50). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
68.
Mitleton-KellyE.RamalingamB. (2011). Organisational learning and complexity science: Exploring the joint potential. In AllenP.MaguireS.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 349-365). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
69.
MongeP. S.ContractorN. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70.
MorinE. (2007). Restricted complexity, general complexity. In GershensonC.AertsD.EdmondsB. (Eds.), Worldviews, science and us: Philosophy and complexity (pp. 5-29). Singapore: World Scientific.
71.
MorrisonK. (2008). Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 19-34. doi:10.1002/9781444307351.ch2
72.
MurphyP. (2010). The intractability of reputation: Media coverage as a complex system in the case of Martha Stewart. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 209-237. doi:10.1080/10627261003601648
73.
PaceR. W. (2013). Communication, work systems and HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 37, 201-219. doi:10.1108/03090591311301699
74.
PigliucciM. (2000). Chaos and complexity: Should we be skeptical?Skeptic, 8, 62-70.
75.
PooleM. S. (2014). Systems theory. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication (pp. 49-74). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
76.
PooleM. S.LynchO. H. (2000). Reflections on finding common ground. In CormanS. R.PooleM. S. (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground (pp. 211-224). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
77.
PoutanenP. K.StåhleP. (2014). Creativity in short-term self-directed groups: An analysis using a complexity-based framework. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 2, 259-277. doi:10.1504/IJCLM.2014.064455
78.
ReillyR.LindsW. (2010). Complexity. In MillsA. J.DureposG.WiebeE. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 180-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
79.
RichardsonK. A. (2011). Complexity and management: A pluralistic view. In MaguireS.AllenP.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 366-382). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
80.
RichardsonK. A.CilliersP. (2001). Special editor’s introduction: What is complexity science. A view from different directions. Emergence, 3, 5-23.
81.
RoccoT. S.BlissL. A.GallagherS.Pérez-PradoA. (2003). Taking the next step: Mixed methods research in organizational systems. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21, 19-29.
82.
RosenheadJ. (1998). Complexity theory and management practice (Working paper series, LSEOR 98.25). London, England: London School of Economics.
83.
SalemP. (2002). Assessment, change, and complexity. Management Communication Quarterly, 15442-450. doi:10.1177/0893318902153006
84.
SalemP. (2009). The complexity of human communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
85.
SalemP.BarclayF.HoffmanM. (2003, May). Organizational culture at the edge: A case study of organizational change. Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association Meeting in San Diego, CA.
86.
SawyerR. K. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87.
ScottW. R. (2002). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
88.
ShawP. (2004). Changing conversations in organizations: A complexity approach to change. London, England: Routledge.
89.
ShotterJ.TsoukasH. (2011). Complex thought, simple talk: An ecological approach to language-based change in organizations. In AllenP.MaguireS.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 333-348). London, England: Sage.
90.
SiiraK. (2012). Conceptualizing managerial influence in organizational conflict: A qualitative examination. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5, 182-209. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2012.00096.x
91.
SiiraK. (2013). Organizational conflict, conflict management, and communication: A social complexity perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Unigrafia, Helsinki.
92.
StaceyR. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
93.
StaceyR. D. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
94.
StaceyR. D.GriffinD.ShawP. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking. London, England: Routledge.
95.
StephensK. K.HarrisonJ. R.BrowningL. D.SornesJ.SaetreA. S. (2007, November). The electronic garbage can. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
96.
StewartP. (2001). Complexity theories, social theory, and the question of social complexity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 31, 323-360. doi:10.1177/004839310103100303
97.
StröhU. (2007). Relationships and participation: A complexity science approach to change communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1, 123-137. doi:10.1080/15531180701298916
98.
SundstromB.BrionesR. L.JanoskeM. (2013). Expecting the unexpected: Non-profit women’s organizations’ media responses to anti-abortion terrorism. Journal of Communication Management, 17, 341-363. doi:10.1108/JCOM-08-2012-0069
99.
SwansonR. A. (2001). Human resource development and its underlying theory. Human Resource Development International, 4, 299-312. doi:10.1080/13678860126440
100.
TamS.GrayD. E. (2015). Mixed methods in HRD research: Theory and practice from a study of Hong Kong SMEs. In SaundersM. N. K.ToseyP. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on human resource development (pp. 325-339). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781781009246.00032
101.
ThietartR. A.ForguesB. (2011). Complexity science and organization. In AllenP.MaguireS.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 53-64). London, England: SAGE.
102.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367. doi:10.1177/1534484305278283
103.
TrudelJ.ReioT. G. (2011). Managing workplace incivility: The role of conflict management styles—Antecedent or antidote?Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 395-423. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20081
104.
TsoukasH.HatchM. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54, 979-1013. doi:10.1177/0018726701548001
105.
UddinS.HossainL.MurshedS. T.CrawfordJ. W. (2011). Static versus dynamic topology of complex communications network during organizational crisis. Complexity, 16, 27-36. doi:10.1002/cplx.20349
106.
Uhl-BienM.MarionR.McKelveyB. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
107.
Van UdenJ.RichardsonK. A.CilliersP. (2001). Postmodernism revisited? Complexity science and the study of organisations. Tamara: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 1, 53-68.
108.
WaightC. L. (2005). Exploring connections between human resource development and creativity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 151-159. doi:10.1177/1523422305274524
109.
WalbyS. (2007). Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37, 449-470. doi:10.1177/0048393107307663
110.
WaldropM. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York, NY: Touchstone.
111.
YlikoskiP. (2014). Agent-based simulation and sociological understanding. Perspectives on Science, 22, 318-335. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00136
