Editorial

Berg L.D. (2001). Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review. Professional Geographer, 53(4), 511-521.

Borsuk R.M. Aarssen L.W. Buden A.E. Koricheva J. Leium R. Tregenza T. Lortie C.J. (2009). To name or not to name: The effect of changing author gender on peer review. Bioscience, 59(11), 985-989.

Cabanac G. (2012). Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 977-996.

Crane D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 2(4), 195-201.

Fogarty T. J. Liao C-H. (2009). Blessed are the gatekeepers: A longitudinal study of the editorial boards of the accounting review. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(3), 299-318.

Hojat M. Gonella J.S. Caelleigh A.S. (2003). Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers” of science: Fallibility and accountability in the review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education 8, 75-96.

Wing D.A. Benner R.S. Petersen R. Newcomb R. Scott J.R. (2010). Differences in editorial board reviewer behavior based on gender. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(10), 1919-1923.