This article is a response to the preceding article (Alagaraja & Wang, 2012) on developing a National Human Resource Development Strategy Model. While the article makes significant contributions to the body of literature on National Human Resource Development, there are some limitations to the article, including the selection of the two countries of India and China; unaddressed challenges in these two countries; an imprecise application of the concept of a model; the attempt to create a model based on only two countries; the databases used for the literature review; and the inadequacy of the model developed in the article. Several recommendations for future research are also proposed.
AlagarajaM.WangJ. (2012). Towards the development of a national HRD strategy model: Cases of India and China. Human Resource Development Review. doi:10.1177/1534484312446190
FanS.Chan-KangC.MukheneeA. (2005). Rural and urban dynamics and poverty: Evidence from China and India. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
5.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
LynhamS. A.PaprockK. E.CunninghamP. W. (Eds.). (2006). National human resource development in transitioning societies in the developing world. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(1). doi:10.1177/1523422305283150
7.
McLeanG. N. (2006). Organization development: Principles, processes, performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
8.
McLeanG. N.LynhamS. A.AzevedoR. E.LawrenceJ. E. S.NafukhoF. (2008). A response to Wang and Swanson’s (2008) article on national HRD and theory development. Human Resource Development Review, 7, 241-258. doi:10.1177/1534484308316486
9.
McLeanG. N.Osman-GaniA. M.ChoE. (Eds.). (2004).Human resource development as national policy. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(3).
10.
McLeanL. D. (2011). Understanding creativity in organizations: The relationships among cross-level variables and creativity in research and development organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation [UMI 3478500], University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
11.
RalstonD. A.EpriC. P.plus many others.(2011). A 21st century assessment of values across the global workforce [0167-4544]. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 1-31.
12.
WangG.SwansonR. A. (2008). The idea of national HRD: An analysis based on economic and theory development methodology. Human Resource Development Review, 7, 79-106. doi:10.1177/1534484307311415
13.
WiersmanW.JursS. G. (2009).Research methods in education: An introduction (9th ed.). Pearson, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
