Bierema, L.L. ( 2009). Critiquing human resource development’s dominant masculine rationality and evaluating its impact. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 68-96.
2.
Burke, L.A., & Hutchins, H.M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 263-296.
3.
Callahan, J.L., & Dunne de Dávila, T. (2004). An impressionistic framework for theorizing about human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 3, 75-95.
4.
Egan, T.M., Upton, M.G., & Lynham, S.A. ( 2006). Career development: Load-bearing wall or window dressing? Exploring definitions, theories, and prospects for HRD-related theory building . Human Resource Development Review, 5, 442-477.
5.
Jacobs, R.L., & Park, Y. ( 2009). A proposed conceptual framework of workplace learning: Implications for theory development and research in human resource development . Human Resource Development Review, 8, 133-150.
Rocco, T.S., & Plakhotnik, M.S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions . Human Resource Development Review, 8, 120-130.
8.
Storberg-Walker, J. ( 2003). Comparison of the Dubin, Lynham, and Van de Ven theory-building research methods and implications for HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 2, 211-222.
9.
Torraco, R.J. ( 2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367.
10.
Van Maanen, J., Sorenson, J.B., & Mitchell, T.R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1145-1155.
11.
Yorks, L. ( 2008). What we know, what we don’t know, what we need to know-Integrative literature reviews are research. Human Resource Development Review, 7, 139-141.
