This article focuses on the areas agreement between two recent and seemingly disparate Human Resource Development Review articles by Wang and Swanson (2008) and McLean, Lynham, Azevedo, Lawrence, and Nafukho (2008). The foundational roles of economics in human resource development theory and practice are highlighted as well as the need for comparative studies. A framework for conducting comparative human resource development policy studies is proposed.
Becker, G. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
2.
Ehrenberg, R.G., & Smith, R.S. (2008). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy (10th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Hodgson, G.M. (2004). The evolution of institutional economics (Economics as social theory). New York: Rutledge .
4.
McLean, G.N., Lynham, S.A., Azevedo, R.E., Lawrence, J.E.S., & Nafukho, F.M. (2008). A response to Wang and Swanson's article on national HRD and theory development. Human Resource Development Review , 7(2), 241-258.
5.
Rosser, J.B., Jr., & Rosser, M.V. (2004). Comparative economics in a transforming world economy (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Wang, G.G., & Holton, A.F. (2005). Neoclassical and institutional economics as foundations for HRD theory. Human Resource Development Review, 4(1), 86-108.
7.
Wang, G.G., & Swanson, R.A. (2008). The idea of national HRD: An analysis based on economic theory and theory development methodology. Human Resource Development Review, 7(1), 79-106.
