Hegel, G.F. (1830). Philosophy of mind: Part three of the encyclopaedia of the philosophical sciences (W. Wallace, Trans.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
2.
Lee, M. (2001). A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4(4), 327-343.
3.
Lynham, S. (2002). The general method of applied theory building research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221-241.
4.
McLean, G.N. (1998). HRD: A three-legged stool, an octopus, or a centipede?Human Resource Development International, 1(4), 375-377.
5.
McLean, G.N. (1999). Get the drill, glue, and more legs. Human Resource Development International, 2(1), 6-7.
6.
Mclean, G.N., Lynham, S.A., Azevedo, R.A., Lawrence, J.E.S., & Nafukho, F.M. (in press). A response to Wang and Swanson's article on national HRD and theory development. Human Resource Development Review .
7.
Swanson, R.A. (1999). HRD theory, real or imagined? Human Resource Development International, 2(1), 2-5.
8.
Swanson, R.A. (2001). Human resource development and its underlying theory, Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 1-14.
9.
Wang, G.G., & Swanson, R.A. (2008). The idea of national HRD: An analysis based on economics and theory development methodology. Human Resource Development Review, 7(1), 79-106.
10.
Wang, G.G., & Swanson, R.A. (in press). Economics and human resource development: A rejoinder. Human Resource Development Review.
