Levels of analysis perform an important function in framing research and practice in human resource development (HRD). The purpose of this article is to examine the concept of HRD from the individual, organizational, and community-societal levels of analysis. The article highlights both the distinctiveness and usefulness of each level of analysis, identifies tensions within and between them, and outlines differences in underpinning assumptions, characteristics of HRD provision, and delivery of HRD interventions. By adopting this approach, the article draws attention to variations in meaning, intent, content, and practice with implications for developing both the theory and practice of HRD.
Ahmed, P., Kok, L. K., & Loh, A. Y. (2002). Learning through knowledge. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
2.
Alder, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-41.
3.
Antonacopoulou, E. P. (1999). Training does not imply learning: The individual’s perspective. International Journal of Training and Development, 3(1), 14-33.
4.
Ashton, D., & Green, F. (1996). Education, training and the global economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
5.
Baldwin, T. T., & Majuka, R. J. (1991). Organisational training and signals of importance: Linking pretraining perceptions to intentions to transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2(1), 25-36.
6.
Baruch, Y. (2001). Employability: A substitute for loyalty. Human Resource Development International, 4(4), 543-567.
7.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernscheim, E. (1996). Individualisation and precarious freedoms: Perspectives and controversies in a subject-oriented sociology. In P. Heelas, S. Lash, & P. Morris (Eds.), Detraditionalisation: Critical reflections on authority and identity (pp. 23-48). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
Belcourt, M., & Wright, P. (1996). Managing performance through training and development. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Nelson.
9.
Bontis, N., & Fitz-enz, J. (2002). Intellectual capital ROI: A causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 223-247.
10.
Boot, R., & Reynolds, M. (1997). Groups, groupwork and beyond. In J. Burgoyne & M. Reynolds (Eds.), Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 85-104). London: Sage.
11.
Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers. London: Open University Press.
12.
Burgoyne, J. (1998, June). Management development for the individual and the organization. Personnel Management, 40-44.
13.
Chalofsky, N. (1992). A unifying definition for human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 3(2), 175-182.
14.
Chalofsky, N. (2000). The meaning of the meaning of work: A literature review analysis. In K. P. Kuchinke (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development Conference Proceedings. Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development.
15.
Chalofsky, N. (2001). An emergent construct for meaningful work. Human Resource Development International, 6(1), 69-83.
16.
Cleveland, J. N., & Shore, L. M. (1992). Self- and supervisory perspectives on age and work attitudes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 469-484.
17.
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. C. (1999). Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theory building. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 346-357.
18.
Deligny, A. (1998). Human resource development in France. Handout distributed at international HRD course, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
19.
Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy. London: Sage.
20.
Elliott, C., & Turnbull, S. (2002, January). Reconciling autonomy and community—The paradoxical role of HRD. Paper presented at the Third Conference on Human Resource Development: Research and Practice Across Europe, Edinburgh, Scotland.
21.
European Commission. (1996). Teaching and learning: Towards the knowledge society. Le Magazine, 5, 3-5.
22.
Garavan, T. N., & McGuire, D. (2001). Competencies and workplace learning: Some reflections on the rhetoric and the reality. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(4), 144-164.
23.
Ghoshal, S., Bartlett, C. A., & Moran, P. (1999). A new manifesto for management. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 9-22.
24.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
25.
Gupta, B., Laksham, S. I., & Ahonson, J. R. (2000). Knowledge management: Practices and challenges. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(1), 17-36.
26.
Harrison, R. & Kessels, J. (2004). Human resource development in a knowledge economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
Hillion, B., & McLean, G. N. (1997). The status of human resource development in French companies. In R. J. Torraco (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development 1997 Conference Proceedings (pp. 694-701). Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development.
28.
Jankowicz, D. (1999). Editorial: Putting the “I” into HRD...Why do we do it?Human Resource Development International, 2(3), 171-174.
29.
Kessels, J. W. M., & Poell, R. F. (2004). Andragogy and social capital theory: The implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 146-157.
30.
Kuchinke, K. P. (1998). Moving beyond the dualism of performance versus learning: A response to Barrie & Pace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(4), 377-385.
31.
Kuchinke, K. P. (2000). Debates over the nature of HRD: An institutional theory perspective. Human Resource Development International, 3(3), 279-283.
32.
Kuchinke, K. P. (2001). Why HRD is not an academic discipline. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 291-294.
33.
Lee, M. (2001). A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 327-342.
34.
Lee, M., & Stead, V. (1998). Human resource development in the United Kingdom. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(3), 297-308.
35.
Legge, K. (1999). Representing people at work. Organisation. 6(2), 247-264.
36.
Loury, G. (1992). The economics of discrimination: Getting to the core of the problem. Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy, 1, 91-110.
37.
Lynham, S. A. (2000). Theory building in the human resource development profession. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(2), 159-178.
38.
Madsen, S. R. (2003). A model for individual change: Exploring its application to human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 2(3), 229-251.
39.
Martin, G., Pate, J., & McGoldrick, J. (1999). Do HRD investment strategies pay? Exploring the relationship between lifelong learning and psychological contracts. International Journal of Training and Development, 3(3), 200-214.
40.
Mathieu, J. E. (1991). A cross level nonrecursive model of the antecedents of organisational commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 607-618.
41.
Mathieu, J. E., & Martineau, J. W. (1997). Individual and situational influences in training motivation. In J. K. Ford (Ed.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 193-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Maurice, M., Sellier, F., & Silvestre, J. J. (1986). The social foundations of industrial power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
McGuire, D., & Cseh, M. (2004, May). The disciplinary development of HRD. In T. N. Garavan (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth UFHRD/AHRD conference. Limerick, Ireland: University of Limerick.
44.
McLean, G. (2004, May). National human resource development: What in the world is it? In T. N. Garavan (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth UFHRD/AHRD conference. Limerick, Ireland: University of Limerick.
45.
McLean, G. N., & McLean, L. (2001). If we can’t define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context?Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 313-326.
46.
Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249-265.
47.
Noe, R. A. (1986). Training attributes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736-749.
48.
Noe, R. A., & Wilk, S. L. (1993). Investigation of the factors that influence employee participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 291-302.
49.
Noe, R. A., Wilk, S. L., Mullen, E. J., & Wanek, J. E. (1997). Employee development: Construct validation issues. In J. K. Ford (Ed.), Improving training effectiveness in work organisations (pp. 153-222). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
O’Donnell, D. (1999). Habermas, critical theory and selves-directed-learning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(4/5), 251-261.
51.
O’Donnell, D., Garavan, T. N., & McCarthy, A. (2001). Understanding the Irish VET system: Beyond neoclassicism. International Journal of Manpower, 22(5), 425-444.
52.
Okongwu, S. O. (1995). Competency requirements for training and development instructors in the Nigerian petroleum industry for the 1990s. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.
53.
Passmore, D. L. (1997). Ways of seeing: Disciplinary bases of research in HRD. In R. A. Swanson and E. F. Holton (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook: Linking research and practice (pp. 199-204). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
54.
Poell, R. F., van der Krogt, F. J. (2003). Learning strategies of workers in the knowledge-creating company. Human Resource Development International, 6(3), 38-43.
55.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
56.
Rainbird, H. (1990). Training matters. London: Blackwell.
57.
Reid, M. A., & Barrington, H. (1997). Training interventions: Managing employee development. London: IPD.
58.
Reynolds, M. (2000). Bright lights and pastoral idyll: Ideas of community underlying management education methodologies. Management Learning, 31(1), 67-81.
59.
Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organisational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 7, 1-37.
60.
Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: Managing the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
Ruona, W. E. A. (2000). Should we define the profession of HRD? Views of leading scholars. In K. P. Kuchinke (Ed.), AHRD 2000 Conference Proceedings (pp. 188-195). Baton Rouge, LA: Academic of Human Resource Development.
62.
Ruona, W. E. A. (2002). What’s in a name? Human resource development and its core. In T. Egan & S. A. Lynham (Eds,), Proceedings of the 2002 Academy of Human Resource Development Conference (pp. 9-16). Bowling Green, OH: Academy of Human Resource Management Resource Development.
63.
Ruona, W. E. A., Leimbach, M., Holton, E. F., & Bates, R. (2002). The relationship between learner utility reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainees. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(4), 218-228.
64.
Ruona, W. E. A. & Lynham, S. A. (2004). A philosophical framework for thought and practice in human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 7(2), 151-164.
65.
Ruona, W. E. A., & Roth, G. (2000). Philosophical foundations of human resource development practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler.
66.
Russ-Eft, D. (2000). That old fungible feeling: Defining human resource development. Advances in developing human resources, 7, 49-55.
67.
Salisbury, M., & Plass, J. (2001). A conceptual framework for a knowledge management system. Human Resource Development International, 4(4), 451-464.
68.
Smith, B. A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321.
69.
Sonnenfeld, J. A., Peiperi, M. A., & Koller, J. P. (1988). Strategic determinants of managerial labour markets: A career systems view. Human Resource Management, 27(4), 369-388.
70.
Sveiby, K. E. (2001). A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 347-352.
71.
Swanson, R. A. (2001). Human resource development and its underlying theory. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 299-313.
72.
Tharenou, P. (2001). The relationship of training motivation to participation in training and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology74(5), 599-621.
73.
Torraco, R. J. (2004). Challenges and choices for theoretical research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), 171-188.
74.
Tosey, P. (1999). The peer learning community: A contextual design for learning. Management Decision, 37(5), 403-410.
75.
Wager-Marsh, F., & Conley, J. (1999). The fourth wave: The spiritually based firm. Journal of Organisational Change, 12(4), 26-35.
76.
Walton, J. (1999). Strategic human resource development. Harlow, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
77.
Weinberger, L. (1998). Commonly held theories of human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 1(1), 75-93.
78.
Weiss, J. W. (1996). Organisation behaviour and change: Managing diversity, cross cultural dynamics and ethics. New York: West.
79.
Wognum, I., & Ford Lam, J. (2000). Stakeholder involvement in strategic HRD aligning: The impact of HRD effectiveness. International Journal of Training and Development, 4(2), 98-110.
80.
Woodall, J., Alker, A., MacNeil, C., & Shaw, S. (2002). Convergence and divergence in HRD: Research and practice across Europe. In J. McGoldrick, J. Stewart, & S. Watson (Eds.), Understanding human resource development: A research-based approach (pp. 339-355). London: Routledge.
81.
Yang, J. C., & McLean, G. N. (1994). Perceived competencies needed by human resource development managers in Korea. In T. C. Head (Ed.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Information Exchange of the Organisation Development Institute (pp. 90-99). Cleveland, OH: The Organisation Development Institute.
82.
Yelon, S. (1992). M.A.S.S.: A model for producing transfer. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5, 13-23.
83.
Zidan, S. (2001). The role of HRD in economic development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 437-444.
