As is true for human resource development (HRD), the field of organization development (OD) draws from numerous disciplines to inform its theory base. However, the identification and selection of theory to inform improved practice remains a challenge and begs the question of what can be used to inform and guide one in the identification and selection of practice-informing theory. This article considers the topic of OD for performance improvement and proposes that the selection of OD theory relevant to the topic can be informed from two perspectives: the theoretical foundations of HRD and multiple domains of performance improvement. When integrated, these two views inform the development of a heuristic and theory-for-practice (TFP) matrix useful to researchers and practitioners. The synthesis of this heuristic is presented, discussed, and applied to the topic of OD for performance improvement. Implications of the TFP matrix for further research and improved practice are briefly noted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armenakis, A. A.,& Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: Areviewof theory and research in the 1990s . Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-327 .
2.
Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G.,& Field, H. S. (1999). Making change permanent: Amodel for institutionalizing change interventions . Research in Organizational Change and Development, 12, 97-128 .
3.
Argyris, C. (1997). Initiating change that perseveres . American Behavior Scientist, 40(3), 299-309 .
4.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
5.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand .
6.
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: John Wiley .
7.
Barnhart, R. K. (Ed.). (1995). The Barnhart concise dictionary of etymology. New York: HarperCollins .
8.
Bazigos, M. N., & Burke, W. W. (1997, September). Theory orientations of organization development (OD) practitioners . Group & Organization Management, 22(3), 384-408 .
9.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press .
10.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education(3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
11.
Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A.,& Spector, B. (1990). Why change programs don’t produce change . Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 158-166 .
12.
Beer, M.,& Walton, A. E. (1987). Organization change and development . Annual Reviewof Psychology, 38, 339-367 .
13.
Bennis, W. G. (1966). Changing organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill .
14.
Bridges, W. (1980). Transitions: Strategies for coping with the difficult, painful, and confusing times in your life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
15.
Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change . Journal of Management, 18(3), 523-545 .
16.
Chermack, T. J.,& Swanson, R. A. (2002). Game theory methodology in HRD. InT. M. Egan& S. A. Lynham (Eds.), Academy of Human Resources Annual Conference Proceedings(pp. 584-591). Baton Rouge, LA: AHRD .
17.
Christensen, C. M.,& Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory . Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74 .
18.
Church, A. H., Burke, W. W.,& Van Eynde, D. (1994). Values, motives, and interventions of organizational development practitioners . Group & Change Management, 19, 5-50 .
19.
Cummings, L. L.,& Staw, B. M. (Eds.). (1985). Research in organizational behavior(Vol. 7). Greenwich, CT: JAI .
20.
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2001). Organization development and change(6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College .
21.
De Geus, A. (1997). The living company. Boston: Harvard University Press .
22.
Dyer, W. (1987). Team building: Issues and alternatives(2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
23.
Egan, T. M. (2002). Organization development: An examination of definitions and dependent variables . Organization Development Journal, 20(2), 59-70 .
24.
French, W. L.,& Bell, C. H., Jr. (1999). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice Hall .
25.
Garud, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2000). Strategic change processes. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
26.
Holton, E. F., III. (1999). Performance domains and their boundaries . Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1, 26-46 .
27.
Jelinek, M.,& Litterer, J. (1988). WhyODmust become strategic. InW. A. Pasmore& R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development(Vol. 2, pp. 153-162). Greenwich, CT: JAI .
28.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations(2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley .
29.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. New York: HarperCollins .
30.
Kimberley, J. R., & Nielsen, W. R. (1975). Organization development and change in organizational performance . Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 191-205 .
31.
Klein, H. J., Snell, S. A.,& Wexley, K. N. (1987). Systems model of the performance appraisal interview process . Industrial Relations, 26(3), 267-280 .
32.
Knight, D., Durham, C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance . Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 326-338 .
33.
Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 60(1), 122-124 .
34.
Luft, J. (1961). The Johari window . Human Relations Training News, 5, 6-7 .
35.
Lynham, S. A. (2000). The development of a theory of responsible leadership for performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
36.
Lynham, S. A. (2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines . Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221-241 .
37.
March, J. G.,& Sutton, R. I. (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable . Organizational Science, 8(6), 698-706 .
38.
McLagan, P. (1989). Models for HRD practice. Alexandria, VA: ASTD .
39.
Micklethwait, J., & Woolridge, A. (1996). The witch doctors: What the management gurus are saying, why it matters, and how to make sense of it. New York: Times Books .
40.
Nicholas, J. M. (1982). The comparative impact of organization development interventions on hard criteria measures . Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 531-542 .
41.
Passmore, D. L. (1997). Ways of seeing: Disciplinary bases of research inHRD. In R. A. Swanson& E. F. Holton, III (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook(pp. 114-137). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
42.
Porras, J. I., & Robertson, P. J. (1987). Organizational development theory: A typology and evaluation. InW. A. Pasmore& R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development(Vol. 1, pp. 1-57). Greenwich, CT: JAI .
43.
Randall, W. L. (1987). Resource economics: An economic approach to natural resource and environmental policy(2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley .
44.
Rothwell, W. J., Sullivan, R., & McLean, G. N. (1995). Practicing organization development: A guide for consultants. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer .
45.
Rummler, G. A.,& Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: Howto manage the white space on the organization chart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
46.
Sashkin, M., & Burke, W. W. (1987). Organizational development . Journal of Management, 13(2), 393-417 .
47.
Schein, E. (1969). Process consultation: Its role in organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
48.
Schein, E. (1987). Process consultation volume II: Lessons for managers and consultants. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
49.
Schrage, M. (1990). No more teams! Mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration. New York: Doubleday .
50.
Schultz, T. (1960). Capital formation by education . Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), 571-583 .
51.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan .
52.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf .
53.
Soukhanov, A. H. (Ed.). (1994). Webster’s II new Riverside university dictionary. Boston: Riverside Publishing Company .
54.
Stevenson, W. B., & Greenberg, D. N. (1998, November-December). The formal analysis of narratives in organizational change . Journal of Management, 24(6), 741-765 .
55.
Swanson, R. A. (1995). Human resource development: Performance is key . Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(2), 207-213 .
56.
Swanson, R. A. (1996). Performance-learning-satisfaction evaluation system. St. Paul: University of Minnesota .
57.
Swanson, R. A. (1998). The discipline of human resource development. In R. J. Torraco (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development Conference Proceedings(pp. 878-886). Baton Rouge, LA: AHRD .
58.
Swanson, R. A. (1999). The foundations of performance improvement and implications for practice . Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1, 1-25 .
59.
Swanson, R. A.,& Holton, E. F., III. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
60.
Tichy, N. (1983). Managing strategic change: Technical, political, and cultural dynamics. New York: John Wiley .
61.
Torraco, R. J. (1997). Theory building research methods. In R. Swanson & E. Holton, III (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook(pp. 114-137). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
62.
Torraco, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Performance improvement theory and practice . Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1, 95-111 .
63.
University of Minnesota AE/HRD Faculty. (1994). HRD definition. Unpublished definitional statement, University of Minnesota, Department of Work, Community, and Family Education, St. Paul.
64.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations . Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540 .
65.
Van Eynde, D. F., Church, A., Hurley, R. F.,& Burke, W. W. (1992). What OD practitioners believe . Training & Development, 46(4), 41-46 .
66.
Van Eynde, D. F., Hoy, J. C.,& Van Eynde, D. C. (Eds.). (1997). Organization development classics: the practice and theory of change-the best of theODpractitioner (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
67.
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
68.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley .
69.
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development . Annual Review of Psychology, 1, 361-392 .
70.
Woodman, R. W. (1989). Organizational change and development: New arenas for inquiry and action . Journal of Management, 15(2), 205-228 .
71.
Woodman, R. W.,& Pasmore, W. A. (Eds.). (1987). Research in organizational change and development(Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI .
72.
Worren, N. A. M., Ruddle, K., & Moore, K. (1999). From organizational development to change management: The emergence of a newprofession . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3), 273-286 .
