A content analysis of the messages posted by family caregivers on an Alzheimer's disease (AD) electronic network wan, undertaken for a 12-month period. The purpose was to let 17 about their caregiving issues and experience. Data frovr 566 subject postings were categorized into topics that varied by stage of caregiving. New caregivers sought in ormation about verifying the diagnosis of AD and anticipatory planning, middle stage caregivers sought specific problem solving assistance, and later stage caregivers struggled with decisions surrounding whether to continue or release caregiving responsibilities. A conceptual model of caregiving transitions emerged from the data. Key themes were normalizing, managing, surviving, with “being there “ and vigilance central concepts. Fiidings suggest that virtual focus groups offer access to geographically diverse caregivers and compliment traditional methods
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Morgan DL: Focus groups as qualitative research. (Sage University Paper Series on Qualitative Research Methods, Vol. 16.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
2.
2. Gray-Vickrey P: Gerontological research: Use and application of focus groups. Journal uf Gerontological Nursing. 1993; 19(5): 21-27.
3.
3. Richter J, Roberto K, Bottenberg D: Communicating with persons with Alzheimer's disease: Experiences of family and formal caregivers. Archives of Psvchiatric Nursing. 1995; 9(5): 279-285.
4.
4. Duncan MT, Morgan DL: Sharing the caring: Family caregivers' views of their relationships with nursing home staff. Gerontologist. 1994; 34(2): 235-244.
5.
5. Garwick AW, Detzner D, Boss P: Family perceptions of living with Alzheimer's Disease. Familv Process. 1994; 33(3): 327-340.
6.
6. Morgan DL, Zhao P: The doctor-caregiver relationship:Managing the care of family members with Alzheimer's disease. Qualitative Health Research. 1993; 3(2): 133-164.
7.
7. Murray PJ: Using virtual focus groups in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research. 1997; 7(4): 542-549.
8.
8. White G, Thomson: Anonymized focus groups as a research tool for health professionals. Qualitative Health Research. 1995; 5(2): 256-261.
9.
9. Rheingold H: The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1993.
10.
10. Rice-Lively ML: Wired warp and woof: An ethnographic study of a networking class. Internet Research. 1994; 4(4): 20-35.
12. Smyth K, Harris P: Using telecomputing to provide information and support to caregivers of persons with dementia. Gerontologist. 1993; 33(1): 123-127.
13.
13. Klemm P, Nolan MT: Internet cancer support groups: Legal and ethical issues for nurse researchers. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1998; 25(4): 673-676.
14.
14. Sharf B: Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health. 1997; 26: 65-83.
15.
15. Brennan P, Moore S, Symth K: The effects of a special computer network on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Nursing Research. 1995; 44(3): 166-172.
16.
16. Bourgeois M, Schulz R, Burgio L: Interventions for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease: A review and analysis of content, process, and outcomes. International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 1996; 43(1): 35-92.
17.
17. Collins C, Given B, Given C: Interventions with family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Nursing Clinics of North America. 1994; 29(1): 195-207.
18.
18. Farran C, Keane-Hagerty E: Interventions for caregivers of persons with dementia: Educational support groups and Alzheimer's association support groups. Applied Nursing Research. 1994; 7(3): 112-117.
19.
19. Knight B, Lutzky S, Macofsky-Urban F: A meta-analytic review of interventions for caregiver distress: Recommendations for future research. Gerontologist. 1993; 33(22): 240-248.
20.
20. Mahoney DM, Tarlow B, Sandaire J: A computer-mediated intervention for Alzheimer's caregivers. Computers in Nursing. 1998; 16(4): 208-216.
21.
21. Strauss AL, Corbin J: Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA:Sage, 1990.
22.
22. Kirk J, Miller M: Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, 1986
23.
23. Sandelowski M: The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science. 1986; 8(3): 27-37.
24.
24. Klemm P, Nolan MT: Internet cancer support groups: Legal and ethical issues for nurse researchers. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1998; 25(4): 673-676.
25.
25. Schrum L: Framing the debate: Ethical research in the information age. Qualitative Inquiry. 1995; 1(3): 311-326.
26.
26. Klemm P, Nolan MT: Internet cancer support groups: Legal and ethical issues for nurse researchers. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1998; 25(4): 673-676.
27.
27. Current Population Survey. Use of computers at home, school, and work by persons 18 years and older: October 1993. Education and Social Stratification Branch, Population Division, US Bureau of the Census. 1993.
28.
28. Poland BD: Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. 1995; 1(3): 290-310.
29.
29. Lindgren CL: The Caregiver Career. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1993; 25(3): 214-219.
30.
30.Glasser M, Miller B: Caregiver and physician perspectives of medical encounters involving dementia patients. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease. 1998; 13: 70-80.
31.
31. Orona CJ: Temporality and identity loss due to Alzheimer's Disease. Social Science Medicine. 1990; 30(11): 1247-1256.
32.
32. Pearson JL, Teri L, Wagner A, et al: The relationship of problem behaviors in dementia patients to depression and burden in caregiving spouses. The American Journal of Alzheimer's Care and Related Disorders. 1993; 8: 15-22.
33.
33. Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, et al: Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist. 1990; 30: 583-594.
