Outcome measures have been widely touted as a valuable tool to guarantee quality assurance in healthcare settings. Recently, a number offactors have conspired to make outcome-based measurement more feasible. This paper describes the advantages of utilizing outcome measures, continuous quality improvement methods and consumer based input to ensure excellence in long term care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Alzheimer's Association: Guidelines for Dignity. Chicago, IL, 1992.
2.
2. Morris JN, Hawes C, Nonemaker S, et al: Designing the national Resident Assessment Instrument for Nursing Homes. The Gerontologist. 1990, 30: 293-307.
3.
3. NIA Collaborative Studies: Special care units for Alzheimer's disease, common core data. Prepared by Coordination Center: Hebrew Home for the Aged, Riverdale, NY, 1992.
4.
4. Institute of Medicine Committee on Nursing Home Regulation: Improving the quality of life in nursing homes. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 1986.
5.
5. Donabedian A: Quality assessment and assurance: Unity of purpose, diversity of means. Inquiry. 1988; 25:6-12.
6.
6. Donabedian A: Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society. 1966; 4: 166-206.
7.
7. Kurowski BD, Shaughnessy PW: The measurement and assurance of quality. In RJ Vogel and HC Palmer (Eds.): Long term care: Perspectives from research and demonstrations. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1983.
8.
8. Linn MW, Gurel L, Linn BS: Patient outcome as a measure of quality in nursing home care. American Journal of Public Health. 1977; 67: 337-344.
9.
9. Institute of Medicine Committee on Nursing Home Regulation: Improving the quality of life in nursing homes. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 1986.
10.
10. Hall J, Epstein A, McNeil BJ: Multidimensionality of health status in an elderly population: Construct validity of a measurement battery. Medical Care. 1989; 27(3): S 168-177.
11.
11. Hofland, 1992
12.
12. Davis, 1991
13.
13. Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, et al: The medical outcomes study: An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 1989; 262: 925-930.
14.
14. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of life measurements. JAMA. 1994; 272(8): 619-626.
15.
15. Caro F, Blank A: Quality Impact of Home Care for the Elderly. New York, NY: The Hawthorn Press, 1988.
16.
16. Zeisel J.Inquiry by Design. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
17.
17. Hawes C, Greene A, Wood M, et al: Family members' views: What is quality in assisted living facilities providing care to people with dementia?Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL. 1997.
18.
18. Katz S. Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al: Studies of Illness in the Aged. The Index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963; 185: 94ff-94ff.
19.
19. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare: Working document of Patient care management. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1978.
20.
20. Weaverdyk S. Assessment as a basis for intervention. IN: Coons DH (Ed.): Specialized Dementia Cafe Units. Baltimore, MD: the Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991; 205-223.
21.
21. Folstein MS, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.JPsychiatrRes.1975; 12: 189-198.
22.
22. Libow LS: Psudo-senility: Acute and reversible organic brain syndrome. In C Eisdorfer & RP Friedel (Eds.): Cognitive and Emotional Disturbance in the Elderly: Clinical issues. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1977.
23.
23. Habot B, Libow LS: The interrelationship of mental and physical status and its assessment in of the older adult: Mind-body interaction. In JE Birren & RB Sloane (Eds.): Handbook of Mental Health and Aging. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
24.
24. Fillenbaum GG: Validity and reliability of the multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. In: Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The OARS Methodology. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development. Durham, NC: Duke University, 1978.
25.
25. Reisberg B, Ferris S, DeLeon M, et al: The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1982; 139: 1136-1139.
26.
26. Cohen-Mansfield J, Marx MS, Rosenthal AS: A description of agitation in a nursing home. Journal of Gerontology. 1989; 44: 77-84.
27.
27. Reisberg B, Borenstein J, Salob SP, et al: Behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: Phenomenology and treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1987; 48: S9-15.
28.
28. Helmes E, Csapo KG, Short JA: Standardization and validation of the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES). Journal of Gerontology. 1987; 42: 395-405.
29.
29. Lawton MP, Leban MH, Rajagopal D, et al: Dimensions of affective experience in three age groups. Psychology andAging. 1992; 7: 171-184.
30.
30. Ware JE: Conceptualization and measurement of health status for adults in the health insurance study, Vol III. Mental Health. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1979.
31.
31. Cleary, 1990
32.
32. Ibid.
33.
33. Rowe, J.W., Kahn, R.L.Successful Aging. New York: Random House, 1998
34.
34. Ruta, 1994
35.
35. American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging: Quality of Life and Resident Satisfaction System for Nursing Facilities. February 7, 1996.
