Building adult day center census by preventing premature terminations

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to report on participant discharges from adult day centers, and to determine if some terminations might be preventable, or at least delayed. Thirteen reasons for participant termination, reported over a 39-month period by 49 adult day programs operating 53 adult day centers, were reviewed. Participants (i.e., client population served) at these day centers included: Adults with Alzheimer's disease or related disorders (on average 70.5 percent of the total client base); persons with mental retardation/developmental disabilities; individuals with chronic mental illness; and/or adults with physical problems. Each reason for participant termination was examined based on the potential to reduce the number of terminations. Three basic categories were used as a point of reference: 1) good potential for improvement; 2) moderate potential for improvement; and 3) little or no potentialfor improvement. The discussion offers a variety of considerations from which adult day centers can monitor and evaluate discharges, implement strategies to reduce the number of unnecessary terminations, and maintain center census.

Keywords

adult day care adult day services respite dementia care Alzheimer's care discharge patterns

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Asbury CH , Henry RS : Day programs for dementia: Responding to the market. Perspectives on Aging. July/August & September/ October 1991; 25-28.

2. Cox NJ , Reifler BV : Dementia Care and Respite Services Program. Alzheimer's Disease and Associated Disorders. 1994; 8(Suppl. 3): 113-121.

3. Henry RS : Considerations in opening an adult day center. Nursing Homes. 1993; 42: 16-17.

4. Reifler BV , Henry RS , Sherrill KA : National Dementia Care and Respite Services Program. Generations. 1990; 14: 70-71.

5. Reifler BV , Henry RS , Sherrill KA , et al: A national demonstration program on dementia day centers and respite services: An interim report. Behavior, Health, and Aging. 1992; 2: 199-206.

6. Reifler BV , Henry RS , Miller JA , et al: Financial self-sufficiency through operating revenue at two adult day centers. PRIDE Institute Journal of Long Term Home Health Care. 1993; 12: 28-32.

7. Sherrill KA , Reifler BV , Henry RS , et al: Characteristics of dementia-specific day programs. PRIDE Institute Journal of Long Term Home Health Care. 1992; 11: 14-19.

8. Sherrill KA , Reifler BV , Henry RS : Respite care for dementia caregivers: findings from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Projects. 1994. In Light E , Niederehe G , Lebowitz BD (eds.): Stress effects on family caregivers of Alzheimer's patients: research and interventions. New York: Springer, 1994; 222-230.

9. Capitman JA : Day care programs and research challenges. The Gerontologist. 1989; 29: 584-585.

10.

10. Wallace J : Factors affecting attendance in adult day care centers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 1987; 11: 155-165.

11.

11. Yee DL , Capitman JA : Reaching financial viability in adult day care. PRIDE Institute Journal of Long Term Home Health Care. 1995; 14: 19-36.

12.

12. Murphy MB : A manual for training the program assistant. Washington, DC: The National Council on the Aging, 1993.

13.

13. Reifler BV , Henry RS , Rushing J , et al: Financial Performance Among Adult Day Centers: Results of a National Demonstration Program. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1997; 45: 145-153.