A Qualitative Assessment of the Concept of Dependence in Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Background: The Dependence Scale (DS) was designed to assess levels of patient need for care due to deficits typical of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This study examined content validity of the DS based on input from patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Methods: Qualitative interviews with experts, patients, and caregivers were used to collect information on the concept of dependence and to assess content validity. Results: Nine clinicians rated item relevance ‘‘high’’ with consensus on the primacy of functional abilities and dependence in the measurement of AD progression. Twenty-two US, 11 UK, and 14 informal caregivers from Spain participated in focus groups; 18 patients participated in 3 separate focus groups. Discussion supported DS hierarchy of dependence, capture of mild-to-severe dependence, suitability of response options, and short recall time frame. Conclusions: Clinicians, caregivers, and patients support content validity of the DS in mild-to-moderate AD. The DS may be valuable to capture dependence within future clinical dementia trials.

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease memory loss dependence qualitative research Dependence Scale

References

Atchison TB , Massman PJ , Doody RS Baseline cognitive function predicts rate of decline in basic-care abilities of individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(1):99-107.

Potki SG , Anand R. , Hartman R. , Veach J. , Grossberg G. Impact of Alzheimer’s disease and rivastigmine treatment on activities of daily living over the course of mild to moderately severe disease . Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2002;26(4):713-720.

Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Unrealized Prevention Opportunities: Reducing the Health and Economic Burden of Chronic Illness; November 2000.

Frytak JR , Henk HJ , Zhao Y. , et al. Health service utilization among Alzheimer’s disease patients: evidence from managed care. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2008;4(5):361-367.

Jonsson L. , Andreasen N. , Kilander L. , et al. Patient- and proxy-reported utility in Alzheimer disease using the EuroQoL. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006 ;20(1):49-55.

Stern Y. , Albert SM , Sano M. , et al. Assessing patient dependence in Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol. 1994;49(5):M216-M222.

Gurland B. Dependency in the Elderly of New York City: Policy and Services Implications of the US-UK Cross-National Geriatric Community Study. New York, NY: Community Council of Greater New York ; 1978.

Brickman AM , Riba A. , Bell K. , et al. Longitudinal assessment of patient dependence in Alzheimer disease . Arch Neurol. 2002;59(8):1304-1308.

Zhu CW , Leibman C. , McLaughlin T. , et al. Patient Dependence and Longitudinal Changes in Costs of Care in Alzheimer’s Disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26(5):416-423.

10.

Zhu CW , Leibman C. , McLaughlin T. , et al. The effects of patient function and dependence on costs of care in Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(8):1497-1503.

11.

Scherer RK , Scarmeas N. , Brandt J. , et al. The relation of patient dependence to home health aide use in Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(9):1005-1009.

12.

FDA. Draft guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claim. Federal Register. 2006;71(23):5862-5863.

13.

Galasko D. , Bennett D. , Sano M. , et al. An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease. The Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997 ;11(suppl 2):S33-S39.

14.

Ferris SH , Mackell JA , Mohs R. , et al. A multicenter evaluation of new treatment efficacy instruments for Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials: overview and general results . The Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11(suppl 2):S1-S12.

15.

Woolf N. Best practices: a little structure in your codes Atlas. Ti Newsletter, March 2007. http://www.atlasti.com/downloads/ATLASti_Newsletter_2007_01.pdf. Accessed June 2009.

16.

Polit DF , Hungler BP Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia : Lippincott; 1995.

17.

McColl E. Developing questionnaires. In: Fayers PM., Hays RD., eds. Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:9-23.

18.

Wackerbarth SB , Streams ME , Smith MK Capturing the insights of family caregivers: survey item generation with a coupled interview/focus group process. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(8): 1141-1154.

19.

Zhu CW , Leibman C. , Townsend R. , et al. Bridging from clinical endpoints to estimates of treatment value for external decision makers. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(3):256-259.

20.

Clare L. Managing threats to self: awareness in early stage Alzheimer’s disease . Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(6):1017-1029.

21.

McRae H. ‘Making the best you can of it’: living with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Soc Health Illn. 2008;30(3):396-412.