Informed consent implications of diagnostic evaluations for dementia

Boustani M , Callahan CM , Unverzagt FW , et al.: Implementing a screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care. J Gen Intern Med.2005; 20: 572-577.

Kapp MB : Legal standards for the medical diagnosis and treatment of dementia. J Legal Med.2002; 23: 359-402.

Kapp MB : Health care in the marketplace: Implications for decisionally impaired consumers and their surrogates and advocates. South Ill Univ Law J. 1999; 24: 1-51.

Dresser R : Dementia research: Ethics and policy for the twentyfirst century. Georgia Law Rev.2001; 35: 661-690.

Sulmasy DP : Informed consent without autonomy. Fordham Urban Law J.2002; 30: 207-220.

Francis LP : Decisionmaking at the end of life: Patients with Alzheimer's or other dementias. Georgia Law Rev.2001; 35: 539-619.

Faden RR , Beauchamp T : A History and Theory of Informed Consent.New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

Kapp MB : Measuring client capacity: Not so easy, not so fast. NAELA (Natl Acad Elder Law Attorneys) Q. 2000; 13: 3-6.

Public Law No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).

Heller J : Catch-22.New York: Dell Publishing, 1961.

Coste JK : Learning to Speak Alzheimer's. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.

Baker FM : Assessing competency in the elderly. In Zimny GH , Grossberg GT (eds): Guardianship of the Elderly: Psychiatric and Judicial Aspects.New York: Springer Publishing Co., 1998.

Gillick MR : Tangled Minds: Understanding Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias. New York: Dutton, 1998.

Kapp MB : Reforming guardianship reform: Reflections on disagreements, deficits and responsibilities. Stetson Law Rev.2002; 31: 1047-1055.

Sabatino CP : The legal and functional status of the medical proxy: Suggestions for statutory reform. J Law Med Ethics 1999; 27: 52-68.

Kapp MB : Decisional capacity in theory and practice: Legal process versus ‘bumbling through’. Aging Mental Health.2002; 6: 413-417.