This study explores the role of similarity in the success of peer support relationships in an intervention program for dementia caregivers. Hypothesized predictors of successful matches included structural similarity between partners (e.g., in age, education), appraisal similarity (e.g., in satisfaction with support for caregiving), and psychological similarity (e.g., in psychological wellbeing). Contrary to expectations, no relationship between these types of similarity and the success of the match were found, but effects were found for dissimilar pairs on several characteristics. The findings suggest: 1) that what really makes a difference for successful peer support is sharing the stressful but also rewarding experience of caregiving; and 2) that program planners do not need to develop extensive matching criteria.
Dibartolo M: Caregiver burden: Instruments, challenges, and nursing implications for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. J Gerontol Nurs.2000; 26: 46-53.
2.
George L, Gwyther L: Caregiver well-being: A multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults. Gerontologist. 1986; 26: 253-259.
3.
Moore MJ, Zhu CW, Clipp EC: Informal costs of dementia care: Estimates from the National Longitudinal Caregiver Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci.2001; 56(4): S219-S228.
4.
Pillemer K, Suitor J: Family stress and social support among caregivers to persons with Alzheimer's disease. In Pierce G, Sarason B, Sarason I: Handbook of Social Support and the Family. New York: Plenum Press, 1996.
5.
Schultz R, Williamson G: Health effects of caregiving: Prevalence of mental and physical illness in Alzheimer's caregivers. In Light E, Niederehe G, Lebowitz B: Stress Effects on Family Caregivers of Alzheimer's Patients. New York: Springer, 1994; 38-63.
6.
Wallston S: Effects of caregiving, gender, and race on the health, mutuality, and social supports of older couples. J Aging Health. 2000; 12: 90-111.
7.
Alaggia R, Michalski J, Vine C: The use of peer support for parents and youth living in the trauma of child sexual abuse: An innovative approach. J Child Sexual Abuse. 1999; 8: 57-75.
8.
Chinman M, Weingarten R, Stayner D, Davidson L: Chronicity reconsidered: Improving person-environment fit through a consumer run service. Community Ment Health J.2001; 37: 215-229.
9.
Dunn J, Steginga S, Occhiinti S, Wilson K: Evaluation of a peer support program for women with breast cancer—lessons for practitioners. J Community Appl Soc Psychol.1999; 9: 13-22.
10.
Eckenrode J, Hamilton S: One-to-one support interventions: Home visitation and mentoring. In Cohen S, Underwood L, Gottlieb B: Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford, 2000.
11.
Shukla S, Kennedy C, Cushing L: Intermediate school students with severe disabilities: Supporting their social participation in general education classrooms. J Positive Behav Intervent. 1999; 1: 130-140.
12.
Pillemer KL, Landreneau T, Suitor JJ: Volunteers in a peer support project for family caregivers: What motivates them?Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 1996; 11: 13-19.
13.
Pillemer K, Suitor JJ: “It takes one to help one”: Effects of similar others on the well-being of caregivers. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci.1996; 51(5): S250-S257.
14.
Gottlieb G: Theory into practice: Issues that surface in planning interventions which mobilize support. In Sarason I, Sarason B: Social Support: Theory, Research, and Application. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nihof, 1985.
Horowitz L, Krasnoperova E, Tatar D, et al.: The way to console may depend on the goal: Experimental studies of social support. J Exp Soc Psychol.2001; 37: 49-61.
17.
Levy J., Gallmeier C, Wiebel W: The outreach assisted peer support model for controlling drug dependency. J Drug Issues. 1995; 25: 507-529.
18.
Sandstrom K: Searching for information, understanding, and self-value: The utilization of peer support groups by gay men with HIV/AIDS. Soc Work Health Care. 1996; 23: 51-74.
19.
Mendoza R: Emotional versus situational inductions of empathy: Effects on interpersonal understanding and punitiveness. Diss Abstr.1997; 57(11-B): 72-76.
20.
Thoits P: Self-labeling processes in mental illness: The role of emotional deviance. Am J Sociology. 1985; 92: 221-249.
21.
Griffith J: Social support providers: Who are they? Where are they met? And the relationship of network characteristics to psychological distress. Basic Appl Soc Psych.1985; 6: 41-60.
22.
Krause N: Negative interaction and satisfaction with social support among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci.1995; 50(2): P59-P73.
23.
Pillemer K, Suitor JJ: Peer support for Alzheimer's caregivers: Is it enough to make a difference?Res Aging.2002; 24: 171-193.
24.
Chapleski E, Lamphere J, Kaczynski R, et al.: Structure of a depression measure among American Indian elders: Confirmatory factor analysis of the CES-D Scale. Res Aging.1997; 19: 462-485.
25.
Koropeckyj-Cox T: Loneliness and depression in middle and old age: Are the childless more vulnerable?J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci.1998; 53(6): S303-S312.
