This study examines the extent to which citizens’ trust in election management bodies (EMBs) is shaped by the autonomy of these institutions. Drawing on 5 years of survey data from 17 Latin American countries and a series of (mixed-effects) ordered-logistic regressions, it reveals two key findings. First, there is a robust, positive association between EMB autonomy and citizens’ trust. And second, both individual- and country-level factors significantly influence citizens’ trust in EMBs. In doing so, the study makes an empirical contribution to a literature often confined to single-year or single-country analyses. It also makes a theoretical contribution by treating EMBs as regulatory institutions, and by extending the literature on regulatory trust to the electoral domain. This offers new conceptual insights, as well as practical guidance for policy makers seeking to strengthen democratic legitimacy through institutional design.
AckermanBruce. 2000. “The new separation of powers.” Harvard Law Review, 113(3):633–729.
2.
BachmannReinhard. 2001. “Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations.” Organization Studies, 22(2):337–365.
3.
BachmannReinhard and InkpenAndrew C.. 2011. “Understanding Institutional-based Trust Building Processes in Inter-organizational Relationships.” Organization Studies, 32(2):281–301.
4.
BaldassareMark. 1985. “Trust in local government.” Social Science Quarterly, 66(3).
5.
BargstedMatías and González-IdeAndrés. 2024. “Social trust and the winner-loser gap.” Electoral Studies, 92:102869.
6.
BarredaMikel and Ruiz RodríguezLeticia M.. 2013. “La cadena causal de la confianza en los organismos electorales de América Latina: Sus determinantes y su impacto sobre la calidad de la democracia.” Revista de Ciencia Política, 33(3):649–673.
7.
BirchSarah. 2008. “Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis.” Electoral Studies, 27(2):305–320.
8.
BodaZsolt and Medve-BálintGergo. 2014. “Does institutional trust in East Central Europe differ from Western Europe?” European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 3(2):1–17.
9.
BoixCarles, MillerMichael K., and RosatoSebastian. 2022. Boix-Miller-Rosato Dichotomous Coding of Democracy, 1800-2020. Harvard Dataverse; doi: 10.7910/DVN/FENWWR
10.
BourdieuP. 1989. La noblesse d’Etat: grandes ecoles et esprit de corps [The State nobility: elite schools in the field of power].Paris: Editions de minuit.
11.
BratspiesR. M. 2009. “Regulatory Trust.” Arizona Law Review, 51.
12.
BronfmanNicolas C., JiménezRaquel B., ArevaloPilar C., and CifuentesLuis A.. 2015. “Public acceptance of electricity generation sources: The role of trust in regulatory institutions.” Energy & Environment, 26(3):349–368.
13.
BrownlieJulie and HowsonAlexandra. 2005. “Leaps of Faith’ and MMR: An Empirical Study of Trust.” Sociology, 39(2):221–239.
14.
BrubakerRogers. 2021. “Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic.” Thesis Eleven, 164(1):73–87.
15.
CattHelena, EllisAndrew, MaleyMichael, WallAlan, and WolfPeter. 2014. Electoral Management Design. Stockholm: International IDEA.
16.
CatterbergGabriela and MorenoAlejandro. 2006. “The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1):31–48.
17.
ChatzopoulouSevasti, ErikssonNelida L., and ErikssonDennis. 2020. “Sevasti Chatzopoulou.” Frontiers in Plant Science, 11.
18.
ChristensenTom and LægreidPer. 2005. “Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography.” Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4):487–511.
19.
CitrinJack and StokerLaura. 2018. “Political trust in a cynical age.” Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1):49–70.
20.
da Silva TaroucoG. 2016. “The role of political parties in electoral governance: Delegation and the quality of elections in Latin America.” Election Law Journal, 15(1):83–95.
21.
DevosThierry, SpiniDario, and SchwartzShalom H.. 2002. “Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions.” The British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(Pt 4):481–494.
22.
DrakosKonstantinos, KallandranisChristos, and KaridisSocrates. 2019. “Determinants of trust in institutions in times of crisis: Survey-based evidence from the European Union.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6):1228–1246.
23.
DunnKris. 2011. “Left-Right identification and education in Europe: A contingent relationship.” Comparative European Politics, 9(3):292–316.
24.
DunneS. and SmithS. S.. 2012. Electoral Management During Transition: Challenges and Opportunities. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
25.
Edelman. 2023. Edelman Trust Barometer. New York: Edelman.
26.
ElgieR. and McMenaminI.. 2005. “Credible commitment, political uncertainty or policy complexity? Explaining variations in the independence of non-majoritarian institutions in France.” British Journal of Political Science, 35(3):531–548.
27.
ElklitJørgen and ReynoldsAndrew. 2001. “Analysing the impact of election administration on democratic politics.” Representation, 38(1):3–10.
28.
ElsigManfred. 2011. “Principal–agent theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex agency and ‘missing delegation.” European Journal of International Relations, 17(3):495–517.
29.
Ennser-JedenastikLaurenz. 2015. “Credibility versus control: Agency independence and partisan influence in the regulatory state.” Comparative Political Studies, 48(7):823–853.
30.
ErlichAaron and KerrNicholas. 2016. “The local mwananchi has lost trust: Design, transition and legitimacy in Kenyan election management.” The Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(4):671–702.
31.
FoucaultM. 2004. Sécurité, Territoire, Population: Cours au Colle′ge de France, 1977–1978. Paris: Seuil.
32.
García BartoloM. S. 2011. Las reformas electorales a nivel federal en México. El Cotidiano, 166, 79–91.
33.
GargiuloMartin and ErtugGokhan. 2006. The Dark Side of Trust. In Handbook of Trust Research. Edward Elgar.
34.
GarnettH. A. and LeibelE.. 2022. “Public Perceptions of Electoral Management in Canada.” Journal of Election Administration Research & Practice, 1(1):32–52.
35.
GiddensA. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
Gómez DíazJ. and Pérez-DuránI.. 2024. State of the art in the study of EU agencies: the role of trust as a turning point. In: ed. BrandsmaG. J., Handbook on European Union Public Administration (pp. 138–154). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
37.
GrimmelikhuijsenStephan and KniesEva. 2017. “Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations.” International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3):583–601.
38.
HakhverdianArmen and MayneQuinton. 2012. “Institutional trust, education, and corruption: A micro-macro interactive approach.” The Journal of Politics, 74(3):739–750.
39.
HarteliusJohanna. 2011. “Rhetorics of expertise.” Social Epistemology, 25(3):211–215.
40.
HartlynJonathan, McCoyJennifer, and MustilloThomas M.. 2008. “Electoral governance matters: Explaining the quality of elections in contemporary Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies, 41(1):73–98.
41.
HawkinsD. G., LakeD. A., NielsonD. L., and TierneyM. J.. 2009. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HuntingtonSamuel P. 1991. “Democracy’s Third WavE.” Journal of Democracy, 2(2):12–34.
43.
IssacharoffSamuel. 2013. “The democratic risk to democratic transitions.” Constitutional Court Review, 5(1):1–31.
44.
IssacharoffS. 2015. Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Juárez RodríguezI. L. and Rodríguez EstradaA.. 2022. “Confianza en el ine: Un análisis en el marco del proceso electoral federal de 2018.” Apuntes Electorales, 67:137–165.
46.
KampenJ. K., Van de WalleS., and BouckaertG.. 2006. “Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public evaluations of its performance.” Public Performance and Management Review, 29(4):387–404.
47.
KapplerMoritz, VerhoestKoen, BachTobias, MamanLibby, and SchomakerRahel. 2024. “What drives trust in regulatory agencies? Probing the relevance of governmental level and performance through a cross-national elite experiment on EU regulation.” European Political Science Review, 16(4):539–556.
48.
KerrNicholas and LührmannAnna. 2017. “Public trust in manipulated elections: The role of election administration and media freedom.” Electoral Studies, 50:50–67.
49.
KhodyakovDmitry. 2007. “Trust as a process: A three-dimensional approach.” Sociology, 41(1):115–132.
50.
KoopC. and JordanaJ.. 2022. Regulatory independence and the quality of regulation. In: eds. MaggettiM, Di MascioF, & NataliniA, Handbook of Regulatory Authorities (pp. 211–226). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
51.
KrönkeM. 2018. Bounded autonomy: What limits Zimbabweans’ trust in their courts and electoral commission?. Ghana: Afrobarometer [Policy Paper No. 52].
52.
LaneChristel and BachmannReinhard. 1996. “The social constitution of trust: Supplier relations in Britain and Germany.” Organization Studies, 17(3):365–395.
53.
LangfredC. W. 2004. “Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing Teams.” Academy of Management Journal, 47(3):385–399; doi: 10.2307/20159588
54.
LehoucqFabrice E. 2002. “Can parties police themselves? Electoral governance and democratization.” International Political Science Review, 23(1):29–46.
55.
LehoucqF. E. 2012. The third and fourth waves of democracy. In: ed. HaynesJ., Routledge Handbook of Democratization (pp. 273–286). London: Routledge.
56.
LehoucqF. E. and MolinaI.. 2002. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
LembkeM. and Vargas GamboaN. V.. 2024. “Checks and Balances: Electoral Management Bodies as the Third Dimension of Accountability in Latin America.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 33:1–23.
58.
LetkiN. 2018. Trust in newly democratic regimes. In: ed. UslanerE. M, The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.
59.
LippsJana and SchraffDominik. 2021. “Regional inequality and institutional trust in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research, 60(4):892–913.
60.
LockhartL. 2016. Legislative study on government regulation. In ed. FarazmandA, Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 3772–3776). Springer.
61.
López-PintorR. 2015. Electoral management bodies as institutions of governance. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
LuhmannN. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
64.
MaggettiMartino and PapadopoulosYannis. 2018. “The principal–agent framework and independent regulatory agencies.” Political Studies Review, 16(3):172–183.
65.
MajdikZoltan P. and KeithWilliam M.. 2011. “The problem of pluralistic expertise: A Wittgensteinian approach to the rhetorical basis of expertise.” Social Epistemology, 25(3):275–290.
66.
MajoneG. 1997. Independent agencies and the delegation problem: theoretical and normative dimensions. In: eds. SteunenbergB., & van VughtF., Political Institutions and Public Policy (pp. 139–156). Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht.
67.
MajoneGiandomenico. 2001. “Two logics of delegation.” European Union Politics, 2(1):103–122.
68.
MamanLibby, FahyLauren, GrimmelikhuijsenStephan, and KapplerMoritz. 2025. “Measuring citizen trust in regulatory agencies: A systematic review and ways forward.” Regulation & Governance, 19(1):39–86.
69.
MangsetMarte and AsdalKristin. 2019. “Bureaucratic power in note-writing: Authoritative expertise within the state.” The British Journal of Sociology, 70(2):569–588.
70.
MarxBenjamin, PonsVincent, and SuriTavneet. 2021. “Voter mobilisation and trust in electoral institutions: Evidence from Kenya.” The Economic Journal, 131(638):2585–2612.
71.
McDermottMonika L. and JonesDavid R.. 2022. “Gender, sex, and trust in government.” Politics & Gender, 18(2):297–320.
72.
McEvilyB. and ZaheerA.. 2006. Does trust still matter? Research on the role of trust in inter-organizational exchange. In: eds. BachmannR, & ZaheerA, Handbook of Trust Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
73.
McKneallyMartin F., IgnagniEsther, MartinDouglas K., and D’CruzJason. 2004. “The leap to trust: Perspective of cholecystectomy patients on informed decision making and consent.” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 199(1):51–57.
74.
MedeNiels G. and SchäferMike S.. 2020. “Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science.” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 29(5):473–491.
75.
MingoIsabella and FaggianoMaria Paola. 2020. “Trust in institutions between objective and subjective determinants: A multilevel analysis in European countries.” Social Indicators Research, 151(3):815–839.
76.
MitchellP. 2000. “Voters and their representatives: Electoral institutions and delegation in parliamentary democracies.” European Journal of Political Research, 37:335–351.
77.
MoeT. M. 1990. “Political institutions: The neglected side of the story.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6(special):213–253.
78.
MölleringG. 2006. Trust, institutions, agency: towards a neoinstitutional theory of trust. In: eds. BachmannR., & ZaheerA., Handbook of Trust Research (pp. 355–376). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
79.
MölleringGuido and SydowJörg. 2019. Trust trap? Self-Reinforcing Processes in the Constitution of Inter-organizational Trust. In Trust in Contemporary Society (pp. 141–160). Brill.
80.
Monroy-Gómez-FrancoLuis and Vélez-GrajalesRoberto. 2021. “Skin tone differences in social mobility in Mexico: Are we forgetting regional variance?” Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, 4(4):257–274.
81.
Monroy-Gómez-FrancoLuis, Vélez-GrajalesRoberto, and YalonetzkyGastón. 2022. “Layers of inequality: Unequal opportunities and skin color in Mexico.” The Review of Black Political Economy, 49(3):230–250.
82.
MonteroJosé Ramón, ZmerliSonja, and NewtonKen. 2008. “Confianza social, confianza política y satisfacción con la democracia.” Reis, 122(122):11–54.
83.
MozaffarShaheen and SchedlerAndreas. 2002. “The comparative study of electoral governance—Introduction.” International Political Science Review, 23(1):5–27.
84.
MuñozJ., TorcalM., and BonetE.. 2011. “Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union.” Congruence or Compensation?, 12(4).
85.
MurphyKristina, TylerTom R., and CurtisAmy. 2009. “Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?” Regulation & Governance, 3(1):1–26.
86.
NadeauRichard, DaoustJean-François, and DassonnevilleRuth. 2023. “Winning, losing, and the quality of democracy.” Political Studies, 71(2):483–500.
87.
NormanGeoff. 2010. “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics.” Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5):625–632.
88.
OECD. 2022. Socioeconomic conditions and political attitudes: microfoundations of trust. In: OECD, Building Trust to Reinforce Democracy: Main findings from the 2021 OECD Survey of Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions (pp. 47–63). Paris: OECD Publishings.
89.
OlveraA. 2010. La Democratización Frustrada. Xalapa: Editorial Universidad Veracruzana.
90.
PalM. 2016. “Electoral management bodies as a fourth branch of government.” Review of Constitutional Studies, 21(1):85–114.
91.
PapadopoulosAndrew, SargeantJan M., MajowiczShannon E., SheldrickByron, McKeenCarolyn, WilsonJeff, and DeweyCatherine E.. 2012. “Enhancing public trust in the food safety regulatory system.” Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 107(1):98–103.
92.
PastorR. A. 1999. A Brief History of Electoral Commissions. In eds. SchedlerA., DiamondL., & PlattinerM. F., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (pp. 285–312). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
93.
PautzMichelle C. 2009a. “Perceptions of the regulated community in environmental policy: The view from below.” Review of Policy Research, 26(5):533–550.
94.
PautzM. C. 2009b. “Trust between regulators and the regulated: A case study of environmental inspectors and facility personnel in Virginia.” Politics & Policy, 37(5):1047–1072.
95.
PautzMichelle C. and WamsleyCarolyn Slott. 2012. “Pursuing trust in environmental regulatory interactions: The significance of inspectors’ interactions with the regulated community.” Administration & Society, 44(7):853–884.
96.
PollackM. A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Ofxord University Press.
97.
PutnamR. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
98.
Ripoll ServentAriadna. 2018. “A new form of delegation in EU asylum: Agencies as proxies of strong regulators.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1):83–100.
99.
RosasGuillermo. 2010. “Trust in elections and the institutional design of electoral authorities: Evidence from Latin America.” Electoral Studies, 29(1):74–90.
100.
RothsteinB. 2004. Social capital and institutional legitimacy: The Corleone connection. In: eds. PrakashS., & SelleP., Investigating Social Capital (pp. 113–136). New Delhi: SAGE.
101.
RousseauDenise M., SitkinSim B., BurtRonald S., and CamererColin. 1998. “Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust.” Academy of Management Review, 23(3):393–404.
102.
RudolphB. A. and RileyS. J.. 2014. “Factors affecting hunters’ trust and cooperation.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(5):469–479.
103.
SegoviaC. 2006. Percepciones ciudadanas y calidad de la democracia en Chile. In: eds. FuentesC, & VillarA, Desafíos Democráticos (pp. 87–132). Santiago: lacso-Chile lom ediciones Santiago.
104.
ShepsleK. A. 1991. Discretion, Institutions, and the Problem of Government Committment. In: eds. BourdieuP, & ColemanJ. S, Social Theory for a Changing Society (pp. 245–266). New York: Routledge.
105.
SinghShane P. 2023. “Compulsory voting diminishes the relationship between winning and satisfaction with democracy.” The Journal of Politics, 85(3):1079–1093.
106.
SixFrédérique. 2013. “Trust in regulatory relations: How new insights from trust research improve regulation theory.” Public Management Review, 15(2):163–185.
107.
StevensMerieke, MacDuffieJohn Paul and HelperSusan. 2015. “Reorienting and Recalibrating Inter-organizational Relationships: Strategies for Achieving Optimal Trust.” Organization Studies, 36(9):1237–1264; doi: 10.1177/0170840615585337
108.
StiglitzE. H. 2018. Delegating for Trust. The University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(3):633–698.
109.
StolleD. 2004. Communities, social capital and local government: Generalised Trust in Regional Settings. In: PrakashS, & SelleP., eds. Investigating Social Capital (pp. 184–206). New Delhi: SAGE.
110.
SuryahadiAsep, Al IzzatiRidho, SuryadarmaDaniel, and DartantoTeguh. 2023. “How inequality affects trust in institutions: Evidence from Indonesia.” Asian Economic Policy Review, 18(1):73–91.
111.
TallbergJonas. 2002. “Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union.” International Organization, 56(3):609–643.
112.
ThatcherMark and SweetAlec Stone. 2002. “Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions.” West European Politics, 25(1):1–22.
Ugalde CalderónF. V. 2010. “Órganos constitucionales autónomos.” Revista Del Instituto de la Judicatura Federal, 29:253–264.
115.
UguesAntonioJr, 2010. “Citizens’ views on electoral governance in Mexico.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 20(4):495–527.
116.
UguesAntonioJr, and Medina VidalD. Xavier. 2015. “Public evaluations of electoral institutions in Mexico: An analysis of the IFE and TRIFE in the 2006 and 2012 elections.” Electoral Studies, 40:231–244.
117.
UslanerE. M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
118.
Van de VenA. H. and Smith RinP.. 2006. Relying on trust in cooperative inter-organizational relationships. In: eds. BachmannR., & ZaheerA., Handbook of Trust Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
119.
Van De WalleSteven and SixFrédérique. 2014. “Trust and Distrust as Distinct Concepts: Why Studying Distrust in Institutions is Important.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2):158–174; doi: 10.1080/13876988.2013.785146
van HamCarolien and LindbergStaffan. 2015. “When guardians matter most: Exploring the conditions under which electoral management body institutional design affects election integrity.” Irish Political Studies, 30(4):454–481.
122.
Vélez GrajalesR., Monroy-Gómez-FrancoL. A., and YalonetzkyG.. 2018. “Roberto Vélez Grajales, Luis A. Monroy-Gómez-Franco, Gastón Yalonetzky.” Journal of Income Distribution, 7(3–4):134–158.
123.
VerhoestK. 2017. Agencification in Europe. In: eds. OngaroE., & van ThielS., The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (pp. 327–346). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
124.
VerhoestKoen, PetersB. Guy, BouckaertGeert, and VerschuereBram. 2004. “The study of organisational autonomy: A conceptual review.” Public Administration and Development, 24(2):101–118.
125.
WeberM. 1992. [1921]). Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
126.
WicksAndrew C., BermanShawn L. and JonesThomas M.. 1999. “The Structure of Optimal Trust: Moral and Strategic Implications.” Academy of Management Review, 24(1):99–116; doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.1580443
127.
WilkesRima. 2015. “We trust in government, just not in yours: Race, partisanship, and political trust, 1958–2012.” Social Science Research, 49:356–371.
128.
WollebækDag and SellePer. 2007. “Origins of social capital: Socialization and institutionalization approaches compared.” Journal of Civil Society, 3(1):1–24.
129.
WonkaArndt and RittbergerBerthold. 2010. “Credibility, complexity and uncertainty: Explaining the institutional independence of 29 EU agenciesno.” West European Politics, 33(4):730–752.
130.
YouJ.-S. 2018. Trust and Corruption. In: ed. UslanerE. M., The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (pp. 473–496). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
131.
ZmerliSonja and CastilloJuan Carlos. 2015. “Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America.” Social Science Research, 52:179–192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
