Pretreatment Verification of IMSRT Using Electronic Portal Imaging and Monte Carlo Calculations

Abstract

The use of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and Monte Carlo calculations were investigated for pretreatment fluence verification in intensity modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT). Monte Carlo calculations were performed using BEAM, a general purpose Monte Carlo code to simulate radiation beams from radiotherapy units. The dose distribution to the EPID phosphor was calculated by BEAM and then converted to pixel value using a pixel calibration curve. The calibration correlated calculated pixel dose to the measured pixel value for a range of open fields. Points within the region bounded by the photon jaws were extracted for comparison. Criteria for successful verification were 5% local percent difference in high dose regions, 1 mm distance to agreement in high gradient regions, or 2% of the Monte Carlo calculated central axis pixel value in low dose regions. Software was written to quantitatively compare the measured and calculated EPID images. Successful verification of the modulated field required that ≥ 95% of compared points fall within the comparison criteria. Dose response of the EPID was found to be linear with Monte Carlo calculated doses over the dose ranges examined in this work Comparison of the measured and calculated EPID dose distributions showed good agreement with 97% of the points passing criteria. The sensitivity of the methodology to detect field shaping errors was tested by introducing positioning errors in segments of the modulated field. These sensitivity tests indicate that the comparison software designed for this work can detect a 1 mm positioning error in a single segment of the composite IMSRT field. It should be noted, however, that the work presented here is a proof of concept and currently not a clinically viable QA tool. It represents a limited evaluation using a single IMSRT field, and verification of additional fields will be required for a comprehensive evaluation of the described methods before broad conclusions can be drawn. Additionally, the results of this work are subject to the comparison criteria that were used. Clinical implementation of the proposed technique should be evaluated for the specific institutional criteria where it will be employed.

Keywords

EPID IMSRT Monte Carlo.

References

Das

I. J.

Ding

G. X.

Ahnesjö

Small fields: Nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med Phys 35, 206–215 (2008).

Francescon

Cora

Cavedon

Total scatter factors of small beams: A multidetector and Monte Carlo study. Med Phys 35, 504–513 (2008).

Martens

De Wagter

De Neve

The value of the PinPoint ion chamber for characterization of small field segments used in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 45, 2519–2530 (2000).

Siebers

J.V.

Kim

J.O.

Keall

P.J.

Mohan

Monte Carlo computation of dosimetric amorphous silicon electronic portal images. Med Phys 31, 2135–2146 (2004).

Van Esch

Depuydt

Huyskens

D.P.

The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields. Radiother Oncol 71, 223–234 (2004).

Chang

Ling

C. C.

Using the frame averaging of aS500 EPID for IMRT verification. J Appl Clin Med Phys 4, 287–299 (2003).

Talamonti

Casati

Bucciolini

Pretreatment verification of IMRT absolute dose distributions using a commercial a-Si EPID. Med Phys 33, 4367–4378 (2006).

Lee

Menk

Cadman

Greer

A simple approach to using an amorphous silicon EPID to verify IMRT planar dose maps. Med Phys 36, 984–992 (2009).

Greer

P.B.

Popescu

C. C.

Dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for verification of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys 30, 1618–1627 (2003).

10.

Boudry

J. M.

Antonuk

L. E.

Radiation damage of amorphous silicon, thin-film, field-effect transistors. Med Phys 23, 743–754 (1996).

11.

Herman

M. G.

Balter

J. M.

Jaffray

D. A.

McGee

K. P.

Munro

Shalev

Van Herk

Wong

J. W.

Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. Med Phys 28, 712–737 (2001).

12.

Siewerdsen

J. H.

Signal, noise, and detective quantum efficiency of a-Si:H flat-panel imagers.

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) at the University of Michigan (1998).

13.

Munro

Bouius

D. C.

X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays. Med Phys 25, 689–702 (1998).

14.

Rogers

D. W. O.

Faddegon

B. A.

Ding

G. X.

C.-M.

BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med Phys 22, 503–524 (1995).

15.

Nelson

W. R.

Hirayama

Rogers

D. W. O.

The EGS4 Code System. Report SLAC-265. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center , Stanford, California (1985).

16.

van der Zee

Welleweerd

Calculating photon beam characteristics with Monte Carlo techniques. Med Phys 26, 1883–1892 (1999).

17.

Libby

Siebers

Mohan

Validation of Monte Carlo generated phase-space descriptions of medical linear accelerators. Med Phys 26, 1476–1483 (1999).

18.

De Vlamynck

Palmans

Verhaegen

De Wagter

De Neve

Thierens

Dose measurements compared with Monte Carlo simulations of narrow 6 MV multileaf collimator shaped photon beams. Med Phys 26, 1874–1882 (1999).

19.

C.-M.

Rogers

D. W. O.

Walters

DOSXYZ99 Users Manual. National Research Council of Canada Report PIRS-0509B (rev D) (NRC, Ottawa) (1999).