Comparison of Daily Couch Shifts Using MVCT (TomoTherapy) and B-mode Ultrasound (BAT System) during Prostate Radiotherapy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare daily couch shifts after prostate localization between megavoltage CT (MVCT, Hi-ART® TomoTherapy) and b-mode ultrasound (BAT system). Nine hundred and thirteen couch shifts from 22 consecutive patients treated using MVCT localization were compared to 853 shifts from 23 randomly selected patients treated using b-mode ultrasound prostate localization. Shifts were made in three principal axes based on prostate position after comparing daily images to the initial planning CT. Mean shift for each axis and the shift variability both between and within individual subjects were calculated. Variability was higher for BAT compared to MVCT for vertical and cranial-caudal (CC) shifts (p = 0.0084 and 0.01037, respectively), while lateral shifts were significantly greater for MVCT. For each individual, the pairwise correlations between shifts in different axes were calculated. Among all the groups and pairings, only the pairing of vertical and cranial/caudal adjustments in BAT-localized patients showed significant evidence of correlation after adjustment for multiple pairwise comparisons (p = 0.0006). When compared to MVCT, the use of BAT for prostate localization results in greater variability of positional adjustments in vertical and CC directions. This likely reflects differences in the ability to precisely align b-mode ultrasound contours to KVCT images, as well as prostate excursion in vertical and CC direction caused by the ultrasound probe. These considerations need to be made when defining treatment volumes, and argue for the use of less disruptive techniques for daily prostate localization.

Keywords

Prostate BAT Ultrasound MVCT and Tomotherapy

References

Pollack

Hanlon

Horwitz

E. M.

Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: A rationale for IMRT. World J Urol 21, 200–208 (2003).

Lattanzi

McNeeley

Pinover

A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43, 719–725 (1999).

Pouliot

Aubin

Langen

K. M.

(Non)-migration of radiopaque markers used for on-line localization of the prostate with an electronic portal imaging device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56, 862–866 (2003).

Fung

A. Y.

Ayyangar

K. M.

Djajaputra

Ultrasound-based guidance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Med Dosim 31, 20–29 (2006).

Langen

K. M.

Pouliot

Anezinos

Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57, 635–644 (2003).

Smitsmans

M. H.

de Bois

Sonke

J. J.

Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63, 975–984 (2005).

Fuss

Cavanaugh

S. X.

Fuss

Daily stereotactic ultrasound prostate targeting: Inter-user variability. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2, 161–170 (2003).

Langen

K. M.

Zhang

Andrews

R. D.

Initial experience with megavoltage (MV) CT guidance for daily prostate alignments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62, 1517–1524 (2005).

Kupelian

P. A.

Willoughby

T. R.

Meeks

S. L.

Intraprostatic fiducials for localization of the prostate gland: Monitoring intermarker distances during radiation therapy to test for marker stability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62, 1291–1296 (2005).

10.

Little

D. J.

Dong

Levy

L. B.

Use of portal images and BAT ultrasonography to measure setup error and organ motion for prostate IMRT: Implications for treatment margins. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56, 1218–1224 (2003).

11.

McNair

H. A.

Mangar

S. A.

Coffey

A comparison of CT-and ultrasound-based imaging to localize the prostate for external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65, 678–687 (2006).

12.

Scarbrough

T. J.

Golden

N. M.

Ting

J. Y.

Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65, 378–387 (2006).

13.

Serago

C. F.

Buskirk

S. J.

Igel

T. C.

Comparison of daily megavoltage electronic portal imaging or kilovoltage imaging with marker seeds to ultrasound imaging or skin marks for prostate localization and treatment positioning in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65, 1585–1592 (2006).

14.

Feigenberg

S. J.

Paskalev

McNeeley

Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: A prospective evaluation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 8, 2268 (2007).

15.

Chandra

Dong

Huang

Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56, 436–447 (2003).

16.

Fung

A. Y.

Enke

C. A.

Ayyangar

K. M.

Prostate motion and isocenter adjustment from ultrasound-based localization during delivery of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61, 984–992 (2005).

17.

McGahan

J. P.

Ryu

Fogata

Ultrasound probe pressure as a source of error in prostate localization for external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60, 788–793 (2004).

18.

Dobler

Mai

Ross

Evaluation of possible prostate displacement induced by pressure applied during transabdominal ultrasound image acquisition. Strahlenther Onkol 182, 240–246 (2006).

19.

Ramsey

C. R.

Scaperoth

Seibert

Image-guided helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Technique and initial clinical observations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 8, 2320 (2007).

20.

Orton

N. P.

Jaradat

H. A.

Tome

W. A.

Clinical assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound prostate localization for external beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 33, 4710–4717 (2006).

21.

Hoogeman

M. S.

van Herk

de Bois

Strategies to reduce the systematic error due to tumor and rectum motion in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 74, 177–185 (2005).

22.

Artignan

Smitsmans

M. H.

Lebesque

J. V.

Online ultrasound image guidance for radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Impact of image acquisition on prostate displacement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59, 595–601 (2004).

23.

Serago

C. F.

Chungbin

S. J.

Buskirk

S. J.

Initial experience with ultrasound localization for positioning prostate cancer patients for external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53, 1130–1138 (2002).

24.

Padhani

A. R.

Khoo

V. S.

Suckling

Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44, 525–533 (1999).

25.

Roach

3rd Faillace-Akazawa

Malfatti

Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35, 1011–1018 (1996).

26.

Rasch

Barillot

Remeijer

Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: A multi-observer study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43, 57–66 (1999).

27.

Morr

DiPetrillo

Tsai

J. S.

Implementation and utility of a daily ultrasound-based localization system with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53, 1124–1129 (2002).