Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. In solid tumors, the microenvironment plays a critical role in tumor development, and it has been described a communication between the different cell types that conform the stroma, including fibroblasts, pericytes, adipocytes, immune cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Intercellular communication is bidirectional, complex, multifactorial and is mediated by the secretion of molecules and extracellular vesicles. The extracellular vesicles are vesicles limited by two membranes that are secreted by normal and cancer cells into the extracellular space. Extracellular vesicle cargo is complex and includes proteins, miRNAs, DNA and lipids, and their composition is specific to their parent cells. Extracellular vesicles are taken up for neighboring or distant cells. Particularly, extracellular vesicles from breast cancer cells are taken up for fibroblasts and it induces the activation of fibroblasts into cancer-associated fibroblasts. Interestingly, cancer associated fibroblasts release extracellular vesicles that are taken up for breast cancer cells and promote migration, invasion, proliferation, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, changes in metabolism, chemoresistance, evasion of immune system and remodeling of extracellular matrix. In addition, the enrichment of specific cargos in extracellular vesicles of breast cancer patients has been suggested to be used as biomarkers of the disease. Here we review the current literature about the intercommunication between tumor cells and cancer associated fibroblasts through extracellular vesicles in breast cancer.

Keywords

cancer-associated fibroblasts extracellular vesicles breast cancer stroma microenvironment

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent diseases in the world and the rate of new cases continues increasing. According to Global Cancer Statistics (2020), it has been estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases and 10 million cancer deaths in 2020.¹ Over the last decades, more resources and efforts have been directed at increasing our knowledge about the molecular and cellular processes involved in cancer. In solid tumors, the stroma plays an important role in every stage of the disease, from induction of early proliferation to the creation of a metastatic niche.² The functions carried out by stromal cells may be considered in both tumor suppression and tumor promotion, which is consistent with the complexity of this compartment.³ The stroma consists of a variety of cell types including fibroblast, myofibroblasts, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), immune, epithelial, vascular and smooth muscle cells, which secrete a variety of molecules including cytokines and extracellular matrix (ECM) components.⁴ The intercellular communication between the tumor and its microenvironment is bidirectional, complex, and multifactorial.² Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play an essential role in tumor progression, because they mediate a variety of cellular processes directly related with tumor progression including migration, invasion, and the creation of a tumor supporting stroma and an environment for the recruitment and transformation of CAFs.^5–8 Here we review the current literature about the intercommunication between tumor cells and CAFs mediated by EVs in breast cancer.

Extracellular Vesicles

EVs are vesicles limited by two membranes that are secreted by normal and cancer cells into the extracellular space. The term “extracellular vesicle” was first used in 1971.⁹ However, the foundation of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles in 2011, proposed the replacement of the terms “exosomes” and “microvesicles” with the term “extracellular vesicles,” a generic name adopted by consensus by the international scientific community.¹⁰ Although their designation remains controversial, based on size, biogenesis, or release pathways, EVs have been classified as microvesicles, exosomes, and apoptotic bodies.^11–13

Exosomes

Exosomes were first reported in 1983 by Johnstone and colleagues as vesicles of endosomal origin secreted by reticulocytes during differentiation.¹⁴ Exosomes are small membrane vesicles, ranging in size from 30 to 100 nm in diameter with a cup-shaped morphology and a density ranging from 1.13 g/ml (for B cell-derived exosomes) to 1.19 g/ml (for intestinal cell-derived exosomes).¹⁵ The exosome formation process consists of four stages: initiation, endocytosis, formation of multivesicular bodies (MVBs), and exosome secretion.¹⁶ MVBs are endocytic structures created by the budding of an endosomal membrane into the lumen of the compartment. Once these structures form, they may be sorted for cargo degradation into the lysosome or released into the extracellular space as exosomes by fusing with the plasma membrane. The mechanisms underlying the sorting of the cargo into intraluminal vesicles are not fully understood, however it is suggested that exosomal sorting is mediated by both endosomal sorting complex required for transport-dependent and -independent signals.^8,17 As a consequence of their endosomal origin, nearly all exosomes, independent of the cell type from which they originate, contain marker proteins involved in membrane transport and fusion (Rab GTPases, annexins, flotillin), MVBs biogenesis (Alix and TSG101), heat shock proteins (HSP70 and HSP90), integrins, and tetraspanins (CD63, CD9, CD81, and CD82). Another feature of exosomes is their enrichment in lipids present in rafts, such as cholesterol, sphingolipids, ceramide, and glycerophospolipids with long and saturated fatty-acyl chains.^17–19

Microvesicles

Microvesicles bud directly from the plasma membrane and are larger than exosomes, with a size ranging from 100 nm to 1 μm.²⁰ Shedding of microvesicles is considered a physiological phenomenon that accompanies cell activation, growth, and early apoptosis. A variety of extracellular stimuli are associated with an increase in the secretion of microvesicles including cytokines, endotoxins, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and exposure to shear stress.^21–27 Moreover, a variety of intracellular factors influence microvesicle shedding, such as the increase in cytosolic calcium levels and the degradation of the membrane cytoskeleton.^28–30 The composition of microvesicles is complex and includes scramblase, cholesterol, and phosphatidylserine in the outer membrane.^25,31 Moreover, some microvesicles exhibit an enrichment of proteins associated with membrane lipid rafts.^29,32,33

Exosomes and microvesicles interact with target cells through three mechanisms: (1) membrane fusion and subsequent transfer of their cargo; (2) endocytosis and release of cargo; and (3) ligand-receptor interactions.^34–36 However, EVs also exert an effect on the ECM through the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) embedded in their membrane, such as MMP-2 and MMP-9^37,38 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Biogenesis of EVs. Microvesicles bud directly from plasma membrane, whereas exosomes arise from multivesicular bodies. EVs interact with target cells through three mechanism: (1) EVs fusion with transfer of their cargos; (2) EVs endocytosis and release of their cargos; (3) Receptor ligand interaction with activation of signal transduction pathways. Figure created with BioRender.com (2022).

Apoptotic Bodies

Apoptotic bodies are secreted exclusively by apoptotic cells during the late stages of apoptosis and their size varies between 50 nm and 2μm.³⁹ The content of apoptotic bodies includes nuclear material, cellular organelles, and membrane/cytosolic fractions. The distinctive characteristics of apoptotic bodies include phosphatidylserine in the outer leaflet, a high permeability membrane, irregular shape and densities greater than 1.23 g/ml.^40–42

Cancer-associated Fibroblasts

Fibroblasts are the most abundant resident cells of connective tissue, and their main function is the synthesis and maintenance of ECM components including collagen, laminin, fibronectin, and proteoglycans. Moreover, fibroblasts are a heterogeneous population that are predominantly in G0 phase, however they are found in mitosis during tissue remodeling and repair.^43,44 CAFs are a group of activated fibroblasts with significant heterogeneity and plasticity in the tumor microenvironment that participate by the secretion of a variety of factors in the regulation of tumor occurrence, development, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance.⁴⁴ Harold F. Dvorak stated in 1986 that “tumors are wounds that do not heal” due the similarity of some processes in the tumor microenvironment with those of wound healing, such as, proliferation, angiogenesis, survival, and migration.^45,46 In agreement with Dvorak, CAFs share characteristics with myofibroblasts, a very common long-spindled cell type associated with wound healing,^47,48 and constitute a significant fraction of cells in the solid tumor stroma. In breast cancer, CAFs represent around 80% of all the stromal cells,⁴⁹ and are essential in the tumor microenvironment because they secrete ECM components, cytokines, EVs, growth factors, and other soluble molecules.⁵⁰ The purpose of this review is to familiarize readers with aspects related with the communication between breast cancer cells and CAFs via EVs. The role of CAFs in cancer is a broad and very interesting topic, which is outside of the scope of this review. We refer to an excellent review that addresses this topic (Kalluri, 2016⁵¹).

EVs from Breast Cancer Cells Promote CAFs Formation

The abundance of CAFs in breast tumors is well known and the role of CAFs in cancer progression has been studied in detail, being propose that CAFs may be useful biomarkers in breast cancer.⁵² However, over the last decade, interest has grown with respect to the role of EVs in the development of breast cancer, because a higher number of EVs in breast cancer women compared with healthy controls has been described.^53,54 CAFs from breast tumors have different origins, for instance human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) acquire a CAF phenotype after 30 days of exposition to tumor cell-conditioned media,⁵⁵ whereas normal fibroblasts co-cultured with MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells result in hepatocyte growth factor secretion and the enhancement of tumor growth, a behavior typical of CAFs.⁵⁶ Moreover, EVs from breast cancer cells induce the acquisition of a CAFs-like phenotype in normal fibroblasts.^57–60 Particularly, breast cancer cells release EVs containing miR-125b, which is a negative regulator of p53, and the transfer of miR-125b to fibroblasts results in the overexpression of markers associated with fibroblast activation, such as Acta2, MMP-2, and MMP-3, which promote a CAFs-like phenotype.⁵⁷ Similarly, exosomes released from MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells, transfer miR-146a to fibroblasts, which regulates the expression of thioredoxin interacting protein (TXNIP) and activates the Wnt/beta catenin pathway, and then the induction of a CAF phenotype with their recruitment to the tumor site. In contrast, EVs released from non-tumor epithelial cells MCF10A do not induce the acquisition of a CAF phenotype⁵⁸ (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Intercommunication between CAFs and breast cancer cells. Activation of breast cancer cells induces the release of EVs that activate normal fibroblasts into CAFs. Reprinted from “Tumor microenvironment with Callout,” by BioRender.com (2022).

It has been demonstrated that other cell types, different from fibroblasts, are able to acquire a CAF phenotype, such as adipocytes and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs). Particularly, EVs released from MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells induce a CAF-like phenotype in ADSCs, which is mediated by activation of TGFβRI, TGFβRII, and SMAD2. ADSCs-like CAF phenotypes are functional and express proteins such as SDF1, VEGF, CCL5, and TGFβ, which act as factors that promote tumor development.⁵⁹ In addition, breast cancer cells release exosomes that activate normal fibroblasts and convert them into myofibroblasts (also known as CAFs), which is mediated by surviving, SOD1, actin alpha 2 (ACTA2) smooth muscle and vimentin, and it promotes cancer proliferation and metastasis.⁶⁰ In an in vitro model of fibroblasts, deletion of the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) class IA, leads to the activation of normal fibroblasts into CAFs that increase the secretion of TGFβ, SDF1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 compared with wild-type fibroblasts.⁶¹ Exosomes released from hypoxic MCF-7 cells induce CAFs phenotypes with secretion of IL-6, which is mediated by peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ) and retinoid X receptor (RXR)⁶² (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

EVs from breast cancer cells induce the acquisition of CAF phenotype. Breast cancer cells release EVs carrying miRNAs, lipids, and proteins that activate normal fibroblasts into CAFs. The CAFs are functional and express proteins that act as factors to promote tumor development. Figure created with BioRender.com (2022).

CAFs-Derived EVs Promote an Aggressive Phenotype in Mammary Tumor Cells

CAFs can induce growth and tumorigenesis in breast cancer.^63,64 Tumor development is regulated by the induction of a variety of cellular processes including changes in the phenotype of the tumor cells through the EMT process, which leads to an increase in the aggressiveness of the tumor cells. Proteins and miRNAs carried by EVs can promote neoplastic transformation and are widely involved in the different stages of breast cancer development.^55,65,66 The focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase and an increased FAK expression and activity are frequently associated with metastatic and poor prognosis in breast cancer.^67,68 FAK deletion in in vitro and in vivo models shows an increase in miR-16 and miR-148a levels, which are tumor suppressors in breast cancer. Exosomes released from CAFs that do not express FAK induce downregulation of genes regulated by miR-16 and miR-148a, such as CCNE1, TWIST1, WNT1, and WNT10B in breast cancer cells. In addition, FAK expression in CAFs is required to promote cell migration and metastasis induced by CAFs-derived exosomes in breast tumors.⁶⁹ Survivin is a member of the apoptosis inhibitor family that is expressed at high levels in breast cancer and regulates cell division and apoptosis.^70,71 Breast cancer cells-activated CAFs release exosomes that promote proliferation, migration, colony formation, and EMT in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells; however, these events are not induced by EVs from mammary non-tumorigenic epithelial cells HBL-100. Moreover, an in vivo model using BALB/c-NU mice shows that survivin induces overexpression of SOD1 in CAFs to promote proliferation and metastasis, whereas SOD1 expression is higher in breast cancer women stage II, III, and IV compared with breast cancer women stage I.⁶⁰

PI3Ks are a family of enzymes involved in various cellular processes including growth, proliferation, differentiation, motility, survival, and intracellular trafficking,^72,73 which are implicated in cancer.⁷² The expression of the regulatory subunit p85α of PI3K is downregulated in the stroma of late-stage breast cancer tumors and in patients with lymph node metastasis. In an in vivo model, depletion of p85-/- in fibroblasts, which are coinoculated with tumor cells, induces formation of large tumors and metastases to the liver, whereas wild-type fibroblasts do not induce these effects. Deletion of p85 leads to the activation of normal fibroblasts into CAFs, whereas exosomes released from CAFs p85-/- promote migration and invasion in MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 breast cancer cells, and one cargo of these exosomes is Wnt10b, which is associated with the Wnt/β catenin signaling pathway.⁶¹

During metastasis, cancer cells spread from their origin to distant parts of the body. The most common sites of breast cancer metastases are bone, brain, liver, and lung.^74,75 CAFs-secreted exosomes enhance metastasis in breast cancer. Exosomes released from breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 transfer miR-146a to fibroblasts, which induces the activation into CAFs, whereas CAFs transformed by EVs promote migration and invasion in MCF-7 breast cancer cells through miR-146a, which activates the Wnt pathway. EVs released from breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 are associated with an increase in lung metastasis and proliferation in a model in vivo.⁵⁸ CAFs-derived exosomes isolated from breast cancer biopsies contain high levels of miR-378 and are associated with breast cancer stages III and IV and a decrease in survival. An in vitro analysis shows that miRNAs from CAFs-derived exosomes are associated with cancer stem cells-like properties in response to the regulation of Oct3/4, Nanog, and Sox, as well as with changes in the EMT phenotype, regulation of Snail and Zeb, and anchorage-independent cell growth in breast cancer cells.⁷⁶ Another study demonstrates that CAFs-derived exosomes obtained from breast cancer patients promote a series of cellular processes involved in tumor progression. Particularly, miR-500a-5p is transferred to tumor cells through CAFs-derived exosomes and promotes proliferation, migration, EMT phenotype and formation of spheroids in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The mechanism is unknown but may involve the downregulation of miR-500a-5p targets, being proposed by the ubiquitin-specific peptidase 28 (USP28) gene, which encodes a deubiquitinase involved in the DNA damage response checkpoint.⁷⁷ The coinoculation of CAFs overexpressing miR-500a-5p and MDA-MB-231 cells in nude mice show that high levels of miR-500a-5p are transferred to tumor cells, which promote tumor growth, metastasis, and the EMT phenotype. The miRNA-500a-5p is upregulated in tissues of breast cancer patients and is associated with lower survival, whereas the USP28 gene is downregulated in the tissues of breast cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.⁷⁷

The transfer of miRNAs expressed at low levels is also involved in promotion of tumor development. Treatment of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with CAFs-derived EVs expressing low levels of miR-30e improves the viability, migration, and invasion.⁷⁸ Particularly, miR-30e negatively regulates the collagen triple helix repeat-containing protein 1 (CTHRC1), via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and the overexpression of CTHRC1 increases the migratory capacity of cells.^78,79 The miR-30e downregulation and overexpression of CTHRC1 are found in breast cancer patients and in tumor-bearing mice formed with tumor cells treated with CAFs-derived EVs.⁷⁸ In an orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer, coinoculation of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with fibroblasts increase tumor cell metastasis, whereas in an in vitro model, the conditioned medium of fibroblasts stimulates the protrusive activity and mobility of tumor cells, and it is dependent on signaling involved with planar cell polarity (PCP). These findings demonstrate that autocrine Wnt-PCP signaling is induced by fibroblast-derived exosomes that are loaded with Wnt11 and CD81, which are transferred to MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells to promote metastasis.^80,81 Another study with CAFs-derived exosomes obtained from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients show that these exosomes express low levels of miR-4516 compared with exosomes from normal fibroblasts. An in vitro study demonstrates that low expression of miR-4516 is associated with an increase in the proliferation of TNBC cells through FOSL1, a target of miR-451, and that patients with TNBC show high expression of FOSL1, and it is associated with lower survival. These findings indicate that the transfer of CAFs-derived exosomes, expressing low levels of miR-4516, enhances FOSL1 expression in TNBC cells and promotes tumor development.⁸²

Primary tumors promote metastasis by the formation of a supportive microenvironment at a secondary organ site, termed the pre-metastatic niche. Interestingly, the pre-metastatic changes in the pre-metastatic niche may be mediated by EVs.^83,84 EVs secreted by breast cancer cells can travel to normal lung tissue cells, the metastatic niche, in an orthotopic nude mouse model of breast cancer.⁸⁵ Using an in vivo mouse model, tumors formed by invasive TNBC cells SUM159 induce an increased expression of proteins associated with the pre-metastatic niche formation including fibronectin, tenascin, periostin, and MMP-9 in lung tissue, however tumors derived from non-invasive MCF-7 breast cancer cells do not increase the expression of these proteins. Furthermore, stimulation with conditioned media from lung tissue cells induces the proliferation and migration of MCF-7 and SUM159 breast cancer cells, and EVs released from TNBC cells MDA-MB-231, SUM159 and LRCP17 induce the expression of proteins involved in the pre-metastatic niche including periostin and fibronectin in lung fibroblasts. In contrast, EVs from non-invasive MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells do not induce the expression of periostin and fibronectin in lung fibroblasts.⁸⁶ These findings strongly suggest that EVs mediate the pre-metastatic niche formation in women with TNBC.

Hypoxia is one of the main features of solid tumors and is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer.⁸⁷ Exosomes released from MCF-7 cells that were subjected to hypoxic conditions express high levels of ApoE, CAIX, miR27b, and miR130B, which slightly increase the formation of mammospheres. In addition, exosomes released from hypoxic MCF-7 cells induce CAFs phenotypes with secretion of IL-6, which is mediated by PPARγ/RXR. However, treatment with the PPARγ/RXR receptor agonists, PGZ and IIF, partly inhibit mammosphere formation and Notch3 expression in MCF-7 cells.⁶²

A limited number of studies about the tumor suppressive properties of CAFs have been published. It is clear that CAFs can suppress tumor growth during the early stages of tumor progression, but they can support tumor progression at later stages in parallel with the dual role of TGF-β.^88–90 However, the molecular mechanisms that decrease tumor growth are not fully understood. Exosomes released from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are transferred to MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and downregulate the expression of VEGF and VEGFR-1 through the transfer of miR-100, which inhibit the expression of mTOR in conjunction with HIF-1α. Therefore, exosomes from MSCs induce changes in conditioned medium of MDA-MB-231 cells, and partly inhibit the migration and formation of angiogenesis-like tubules in endothelial cells.⁹¹ Moreover, miR-1-3p is downregulated in breast tumor tissue and is associated with metastasis, whereas miR-1-3p is also downregulated in CAFs-derived EVs isolated from breast cancer patients. The breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, SKBR3, and MCF-7 cells express low levels of miR-1-3p. In contrast, EVs released from CAFs overexpressing miR-1-3p decrease growth and metastasis in breast tumors through inhibition of EMT and proliferation. Interestingly, miR-1-3p downregulates the expression of GLIS gene, which is a promiscuous transcription factor that regulates expression of numerous genes.⁹²

CAFs-Derived EVs Regulate the Metabolism of Mammary Tumor Cells

Metabolic reprogramming is an important hallmark of malignant tumors, which may be regulated by the microenvironment. Changes in metabolism in the different areas of a solid tumor have been demonstrated to occur in various malignancies, including breast cancer.⁹³ Alterations in protein expression are associated with metabolic changes in tumor cells and the intercommunication between CAFs and tumor cells is involved with these metabolic changes^93,94 Particularly, exosomes from MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells show high levels of integrin beta 4 (ITGB4), which can be transferred to CAFs with an increase in glycolysis and lactate production. Moreover, the transfer of ITGB4 promotes the expression of mitochondrial fission proteins, such as FIS1, and the phosphorylation of dynamin-like protein 1 (DBP1) in CAFs, whereas stimulation with conditioned media of CAFs, overexpressing ITGB4, increases proliferation, migration and EMT in breast cancer cells.⁹⁴ A comparative analysis of proteins in exosomes from MSCs and exosomes from breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 demonstrate that MMP-2 and fibronectin are expressed in exosomes from MSCs, but they are not expressed in exosomes from MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. However, exosomes from MSCs transfer an active form of MMP-2 to MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells and it promotes tumor invasion.⁹⁵

CAFs release EVs that transmit miRNAs and lncRNAs into adjacent tumor cells to modulate their behavior. CAFs and breast cancer cells undergo reciprocal metabolic reprogramming through horizontal gene transfer via EVs.⁹⁶ The overexpression of miR-105 in breast cancer cells enhances vascular permeability and induces metastasis, whereas the transfer of miR-105 via exosomes disrupts tight junctions and the integrity of endothelial monolayers, and it promotes breast cancer metastasis.⁹⁷ MDA-MB-231 cells release EVs expressing miR-105, a miRNA induced by MYC, which is transferred to patients-derived CAFs, and it promotes changes in glucose and glutamine metabolism with production of glutamate and lactate, compounds that nourish adjacent tumor cells. Furthermore, CAFs expressing miR-105 are able to detoxify cells for the conversion of lactic acid and ammonium into energy-rich metabolites, which nourishes tumor cells, and these CAFs promote tumor growth in NOD/SCID/IL2R-null (NSG) mice. These findings demonstrate a bidirectional communication between tumor cells and CAFs, which modify the microenvironment and contribute to tumor feeding and growth.⁹⁸

Glycolysis is one of the main energy production pathways in mammalian mammary cells. EVs released from CAFs expressing low levels of miR-7641 promote the formation of a stem cell phenotype and metabolic changes including an increase of glycolysis in MDA-MB-231 and SKBR3 tumor cells through activation of HIF-1α pathway.⁹⁹ CAFs-derived exosomes decrease the rate of oxygen consumption, mitochondrial function, lactate levels, and increase the rate of extracellular acidification in MCF-7 and MDA-MBA-453 breast cancer cells. Moreover, inhibition of SNHG3 expression, a noncoding RNA of more than 200 nucleotides, in CAFs-derived exosomes restores lactate production in target cells by reduction of miR-330 levels, whereas CAFs-derived exosomes expressing SNHG3 promote proliferation and dysregulate mitochondrial function in breast cancer cells. The miR-330 acts on pyruvate kinase (PKM) isoforms and promotes glycolysis in MDA-MBA-453 breast cancer cells.^98–100 In contrast, it has been described different metabolic regulation mediated by miR-122. EVs from MDA-MB-231 cells and breast cancer patients express high levels of miR-122, and these EVs significantly inhibit the uptake of 2-NDBG, a fluorescent glucose analog, in fibroblasts compared with EVs from healthy controls.¹⁰¹ Moreover, an increase of miR-122 expression in fibroblasts decreases the expression of PKM2 and the glucose transporter (GLUT1), and it decreases glucose uptake of CAFs and increase the availability of glucose for breast cancer cells. An in vivo model shows that EVs from breast cancer patients are captured by the metastasis niche.¹⁰¹ These findings support the proposal that cancer progression is mediated by the metabolic regulation of CAFs and breast cancer cells via EVs.

CAFs-Derived EVs Modulate the Immune Response in the Tumor Microenvironment

Many tumors develop mechanisms of immune evasion to survive, including secretion of tumor immunomodulatory proteins, reduced expression of antigen-presenting proteins and EVs secretion.^102,103 Exosomes released from breast cancer cells can influence the immune system by interacting with T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and macrophages.^104–106 Cancer cells express the natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) receptor and its activation promotes the cytotoxic effect of NK cells, and provides a costimulatory signal on T cells. Exosomes are able to mediate immune evasion by downregulation of NKG2D receptor expression in the effector cells including breast cancer cells.¹⁰⁷ CAFs, isolated from breast tumors and adjacent tissues, secrete exosomes expressing high levels of miR-92, a miRNA implicated with the nuclear translocation of the yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), which is a regulator of protein programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).¹⁰⁸ PD-L1 is a protein that prevents the immune cell attack to healthy cells, and its overexpression promotes T cell tolerance and escape from the host immune system during tumorigenesis.¹⁰⁹ Exosomes from CAFs modulate the expression of PD-L1 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and induce upregulation of PD-L1 in NK and T cells, which promote apoptosis and a decrease in proliferation in T cells.¹⁰⁸ In summary, the intercommunication between CAFs and tumor cells modulate the immune response and contributes to tumor progression via EVs.

CAFs-Derived EVs Modulate Composition of ECM

Breast tumors have excessive production of connective tissue and up to 90% of mass may consist of stroma, which presents alterations in density and composition of ECM.⁴⁵ The miR-9 promotes proliferation, invasion, migration, and EMT in breast cancer cells and is associated with poor overall survival in breast cancer patients.^110,111 Moreover, miR-9 is overexpressed in CAFs from TNBC tumors, but it is not overexpressed in CAFs from luminal A and luminal B breast tumors. EVs from TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells express miR-9, which is transferred to normal fibroblasts and regulates the expression of genes that are involved in the remodeling of ECM, including EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 1 (EFEMP1), collagen type I alpha 1 (COL1A1), and MMP-1. In addition, EVs from fibroblasts containing high levels of miR-9 are captured for MDA-MB-231 cells and stimulate migration and EMT process.¹¹² EVs depleted of FN30, a negative regulator of fibronectin expression, from Ca1a mammary mesenchymal cells promote that normal lung fibroblasts (HLF) increase fibronectin accumulation and displacement of the linear architecture of matrix, whereas these effects are not induced by EVs depleted of FN30 from Ca1h epithelial cells.¹¹³

The alterations of stiffness and degradation of ECM contribute to tumor growth, and CAFs play a pivotal role in ECM composition.¹¹⁴ Microvesicles released from MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells promote fibroblast activation, proliferation, spreading, and stiffness on matrices, however these effects are only reported in a rigid matrix that mimics mammary tumor tissue. Likewise, tumor cell-derived microvesicles induce an increase in the traction force of fibroblasts on a rigid matrix that mimics mammary tumor tissue. Interestingly, the biological effects described above are primarily induced by microvesicles from invasive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, however some effects have been demonstrated using microvesicles from non-invasive MCF-7 breast cancer cells, whereas microvesicles from mammary non-tumorigenic epithelial cells MCF10A are not able to induce these biological effects.¹¹⁵

Chemoresistance in Tumor Cells is Modulated by CAFs-Derived EVs

EVs are important players in breast cancer chemoresistance.¹¹⁶ Exosomes carrying HER-2 play a pivotal role in the inhibition of trastuzumab activity,¹¹⁷ whereas exosomes carrying P-glycoprotein (P-gp) are proposed as another mechanism of exosomes-mediated drug resistance in breast cancer.¹¹⁸ Moreover, exosomes from MCF-7 breast cancer cells resistant to tamoxifen promote proliferation of wild-type MCF-7 cells in the presence of tamoxifen, which is mediated by the transfer of miR-221 and miR-222.¹¹⁹

The communication between tumor and stromal cells promotes resistance to hormone therapy in breast cancer.^120,121 Estrogen receptor-positive tumors are metabolically dependent on oxidative phosphorylation rather than glycolysis,¹²² whereas mitochondrial DNA (mt-DNA) is encapsulated in EVs and it can be horizontally transferred to low metastatic cells and stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment.¹²³ Patients with hormone therapy-resistant breast cancer show high levels of mt-DNA expressed in EVs from their plasma and the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system (OXPHOS) is increased in the tumors of these patients, and when oxidative phosphorylation is inhibited in tumor cells, the cells are re-sensitized to hormonal therapy.¹²⁴ An in vivo model shows that breast cancer tumors with resistance to hormone therapy have greater number of CAFs compared with tumors that do not have resistance to hormone therapy. Genomic analyses of a xenograft model (immunodeficiency mice NOD/SCID) of breast cancer demonstrates that the mitochondrial genome is expressed in murine CAFs (mCAFS)-derived EVs, including mitochondrial proteins such as ATP5A and VDAC1, whereas hormone therapy decreases mt-DNA levels, oxidative phosphorylation, and the activity of mitochondria, resulting in cells that are inactive or dormant.¹²⁴

Endogenous RNAs under pathophysiological conditions, such as cancer, may act as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) to activate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs).^125,126 A relationship between TNBC 1833 cells, a metastatic cell line obtained from MDA-MB-231 cells that respond to interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), and cells of the stroma, which mediate communication via exosomes secretion, has been established. CAFs-derived exosomes transfer and increase the acquisition of stromal RNAs in 1833 cells compared with MCF-7 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells that do not respond to ISGs. An analysis of genetic material expressed in exosomes demonstrates an enrichment of noncoding RNAs, including increased levels of 5'-PPP-RNAs.¹²⁷ Likewise, the RN75L1, a 5'-PPP-RNA, is found at high levels in CAFs-derived exosomes and its expression is regulated by NOTCH-MYC signaling pathway. Furthermore, the transfer of RN75L1 to tumor cells via exosomes induces the activation of the RIG-1 receptor, which is a PRR. The binding of RN75L1 to RIG-1 occurs in the absence of RNA-binding proteins, which generate an unshielded RN7SL1 in stroma exosomes, and then RN7SL1 acts as a DAMP. An in vivo model of breast cancer shows that RIG-1 activation by RN75L1 promotes protection of tumor cells against DNA damage and chemoresistance, and induces growth and metastasis. Furthermore, increased levels of unshielded RN75L1 are found in exosomes from TNBC patients compared with estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors patients.¹²⁷

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) play an important role in the tumor microenvironment,¹²⁸ and enrichment of CAFs and CSCs is described in tumor xenografts and tissues of breast cancer patients resistant to hormone therapy. In a model of luminal breast cancer, the transfer of EVs released from CAFs containing increased levels of miR-222 and miR-221 promotes resistance to hormone therapy in MCF-7 cells, whereas this effect is not induced by EVs from normal fibroblasts. Furthermore, treatment with EVs from CAFs in combination with hormone therapy results in an increase in CSCs, a decrease in estrogen receptor expression and upregulation of Notch.¹²⁹ The biogenesis of miR-221 is mediated by STAT3/IL-6 pathway and inhibition of this pathway decreases the metastasis of tumor stem cells and low formation of metastatic niches.¹²⁹ In summary, the transfer of miR-222 into tumor cells through EVs from CAFs induces resistance to hormonal therapy and increase the number of CSCs, which promote the progression of the tumor (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of miRNAs in EVs Associated with CAFs in Breast Cancer.

miRNA	Secreting cells	Observations	Ref.
miR-125b	Mouse 4T1 and 4TO7 breast cancer cells. MCF10CA1a (CA1a) mammary epithelial cells	EVs transfer miR-125b to resident fibroblasts and promote a CAF-like phenotype	57
miR-146a	MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 breast cancer cellsCAFs transformed by breast cancer cells1101	EVs transfer miR-146a to fibroblasts and induce CAF transformationTransfer of miR-16a to breast cancer cells MCF-7 induces migration and invasion.	58
miR-16 and miR-148a	FAK-null CAFs	Contribute to reduction of tumor cell activities and metastasis	69
miR-500a-5p	CAFs isolated from breast cancer patients	EVs transfer miR-500A-5p to breast cancer cells and promote proliferation, migration, EMT, and formation of spheroids. In the in vivo model it promotes tumor growth and metastasis.	77
miR-30e	CAFs	EVs with low levels of miR-30e improve the viability, migration, and invasion of MDA-MB-231 mammary tumor cells.	78, 79
miR-4516	CAFs obtained from tissues of TNBC patients	Transfer of CAFs-derived exosomes with low levels of miR-4516 enhances FOSL1 expression in TNBC cells to promote tumor development	82
miR27b and miR130B	MCF-7 cells under hypoxic conditionsCAFs transformed by breast cancer cell.	Exosomes transferred to normal fibroblasts induce CAFs formation.CAFs-derived exosomes carrying miR27b and miR130B slightly increase the formation of mammospheres.	62
miR-100	Mesenchymal stem cells	Exosomes expressing miR-100 to breast cancer cells inhibit mRNA expression of mTOR with participation of HIF-1α.	91
miR-1-3p	CAFs isolated from mammary tumors	miR-1-3 is downregulated in CAFs and breast cancer cells. Transfer of EVs with overexpression of miR-1-3p to breast cancer cells promotes a decrease in growth and metastasis in an in vitro and in vivo model of breast cancer.	92
miR-105	MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cellsCAFs transformed by breast cancer cells	miR-105 is transferred to patient-derived CAFs and induces metabolic alterations, including changes in glucose and glutamine metabolism.CAFs reprogrammed by miR-105 improvement tumor growth in an in vivo model.	98
miR-7641	CAFs obtained from biopsies of patients with breast cancer	Reduction of miR-7641 levels improves the formation of a stem cell phenotype and metabolic changes in breast cancer cells.	99
miR-330	CAFs obtained from patients with breast cancer	miR-330 participates in glycolysis regulation in breast cancer cells.	98
miR-122	MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells	miR-122 induces a decrease in glucose uptake by CAFs and to an increased availability of glucose for breast cancer cells.	101
miR-92	CAFs isolated from breast tumor tissues	High levels of miR-92 in EVs from CAFs alter the function, induces apoptosis and decrease proliferation of T cells. In an in vivo model it suppresses the function of immune system.	108
miR-9	MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells	miR-9 downregulates genes in fibroblasts that encode for proteins involved in remodeling of ECM.	110
miR-222	CAFs	miR-222 in CAFs-derivate EVs promotes resistance to hormone therapy in MCF-7 cells and increase of the number of cancer stem cells. It also promotes the evolution and progression of the tumor in an in vivo model.	119

EVs from Breast Cancer Cells and CAFs as Biomarkers

Biomarker is a biological molecule found in blood or other fluids or tissues that can be used for screening, diagnostic and/or prognosis of a disease.¹³⁰ In breast cancer, biomarkers involve a wide range of biochemical entities found in body fluids including the components of EVs from tumor cells.¹³¹ In this regard, it has been proposed that specific miRNAs or proteins expressed in EVs could be used as biomarkers of breast cancer.¹³² A study shows that EVs express a significant increase of phosphoproteins in breast cancer patients compared with healthy controls, and the expression of these phosphoproteins has been associated with membrane reorganization, intercellular communication and metastasis.¹³³ Particularly, the phosphoprotein FAK is expressed in EVs from breast cancer cells or CAFs, and it represents a good candidate to be evaluated as biomarker.⁶⁹ In addition, RALGAPA2, PKG1, and TJP2 are significantly elevated in EVs from breast cancer patients compared with healthy controls, and it has been suggested that these proteins are candidates for breast cancer markers.¹³³

We previously mentioned that miRNAs can be transferred via EVs to exert their functions. Particularly, miR-9 regulates and actively participates in tumor progression.¹¹¹ The miR-9 can be transferred via EVs to normal fibroblasts, which promotes their conversion into CAFs, with downregulation of genes involved in ECM remodeling, and then enhancing the motility of breast cancer cells.^110,134 Therefore, miR-9 is a potential biomarker of tumorigenesis and metastasis in breast cancer. Moreover, an in vivo model of breast cancer shows that miR-105 is increased in exosomes during pre-metastasis.⁹⁷ Likewise, miR-105 from MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells is transferred via EVs to patients-derived CAFs and induces metabolic alterations including changes in glucose and glutamine metabolism.⁹⁸ It is another candidate to be used as a biomarker.

EV cargos are specific to their parental cells, and a growing number of studies propose that EV cargos may be used as biomarkers for breast cancer, because EVs are very stable and circulate in blood and other body fluids, Therefore, EVs in the different body fluids represent the liquid biopsies. Liquid biopsies allow the analysis of proteins and miRNAs expressed in EVs and emerge as biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis and prognosis in breast cancer.^131,132 However, further studies are required to establish the EV components as biomarkers of breast cancer.

Conclusion

In summary, current evidence indicates that communication between breast cancer cells and CAFs via EVs represents a novel mechanism that promotes migration, invasion, immune evasion, drug resistance, EMT, and modulates the ECM composition and promotes metastasis in breast cancer (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

CAFs transfer their cargos to breast cancer cells through EVs supporting tumor growth and the acquisition of an aggressive phenotype. Tumor development is regulated by EVs through the induction of invasion, proliferation, migration and EMT. CAFs release EVs that mediate changes in metabolism, immune modulation and chemoresistance in breast cancer cells, and modulate the expression of ECM components. Figure created with BioRender.com (2022).

Footnotes

Abbreviations

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Rocio Castillo-Sanchez was supported by a grant from CONACYT-Mexico.

ORCID iD

Eduardo Perez Salazar

References

Sung

Ferlay

Siegel

, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660

Wernert

. The multiple roles of tumour stroma. Virchows Arch. 1997;430(6):433–443. doi:10.1007/s004280050053

Mueller

Fusenig

. Friends or foes - bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(11):839–849. doi:10.1038/nrc1477

Fan

Houghton

. Tumor microenvironment: the role of the tumor stroma in cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101(4):805–815. doi:10.1002/jcb.21159

Hanahan

Weinberg

. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

Meehan

Vella

. The contribution of tumour-derived exosomes to the hallmarks of cancer. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2016;53(2):121–131. doi:10.3109/10408363.2015.1092496

Webber

Steadman

Mason

Tabi

Clayton

. Cancer exosomes trigger fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation. Cancer Res. 2010;70(23):9621–9630. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1722

van Niel

D’Angelo

Raposo

. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(4):213–228. doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.125

Aaronson

Behrens

Orner

Haines

. Ultrastructure of intracellular and extracellular vesicles, membranes, and myelin figures produced by Ochromonas danica. J Ultrasruct Res. 1971;35(5-6):418–430. doi:10.1016/S0022-5320(71)80003-5

10.

Lötvall

Hill

Hochberg

, et al. Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: a position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3(1):26913. doi:10.3402/jev.v3.26913

11.

Raposo

Stoorvogel

. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):373–383. doi:10.1083/jcb.201211138

12.

el Andaloussi

Mäger

Breakefield

Wood

MJA

. Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(5):347–357. doi:10.1038/nrd3978

13.

Lee

el Andaloussi

Wood

MJA

. Exosomes and microvesicles: extracellular vesicles for genetic information transfer and gene therapy. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(R1):R125–R134. doi:10.1093/hmg/dds317

14.

Pan

Johnstone

. Fate of the transferrin receptor during maturation of sheep reticulocytes in vitro: selective externalization of the receptor. Cell. 1983;33(3):967–978. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90040-5

15.

Théry

Regnault

Garin

, et al. Molecular characterization of dendritic cell-derived exosomes: selective accumulation of the heat shock protein hsc73. J Cell Biol. 1999;147(3):599–610. doi:10.1083/jcb.147.3.599

16.

Théry

Zitvogel

Amigorena

. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(8):569–579. doi:10.1038/nri855

17.

Trajkovic

Hsu

Chiantia

, et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science (1979). 2008;319(5867):1244–1247. doi:10.1126/science.1153124

18.

Wubbolts

Leckie

Veenhuizen

PTM

, et al. Proteomic and biochemical analyses of human B cell-derived exosomes: potential implications for their function and multivesicular body formation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(13):10963–10972. doi:10.1074/jbc.M207550200

19.

Subra

Laulagnier

Perret

Record

. Exosome lipidomics unravels lipid sorting at the level of multivesicular bodies. Biochimie. 2007;89(2):205–212. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.014

20.

Heijnen

Schiel

Fijnheer

Geuze HJ

SJJ

. Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules. Blood. 1999;94(11):3791–3799. doi:10.1182/blood.V94.11.3791

21.

Barry

FitzGerald

. Mechanisms of cellular activation by platelet microparticles. Thromb Haemostasis. 1999;82(8):794–800. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1615913

22.

Beaudoin

Grondin

. Shedding of vesicular material from the cell surface of eukaryotic cells: different cellular phenomena. BBA Rev Biomembr. 1991;1071(3):203–219. doi:10.1016/0304-4157(91)90014-N

23.

Février

Raposo

. Exosomes: endosomal-derived vesicles shipping extracellular messages. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004;16(4):415–421. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.003

24.

Horstman

Jimenez

Bidot

Ahn

. New horizons in the analysis of circulating cell-derived microparticles. Keio J Med. 2004;53(4):210–230. doi:10.2302/kjm.53.210

25.

Hugel

Martínez

Kunzelmann

Freyssinet

. Membrane microparticles: two sides of the coin. Physiology. 2005;20(1):22–27. doi:10.1152/physiol.00029.2004

26.

VanWijk

VanBavel

Sturk

Nieuwland

. Microparticles in cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;59(2):277–287. doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00367-5

27.

Lynch

Ludlam

. Plasma microparticles and vascular disorders. Br J Haematol. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06514.x

28.

Moskovich

Fishelson

. Live cell imaging of outward and inward vesiculation induced by the complement C5b-9 complex. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(41):29977–29986. doi:10.1074/jbc.M703742200

29.

Pilzer

Gasser

Moskovich

Schifferli

Fishelson

. Emission of membrane vesicles: roles in complement resistance, immunity and cancer. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2005;27(3):375–387. doi:10.1007/s00281-005-0004-1

30.

Ratajczak

Wysoczynski

Hayek

Janowska-Wieczorek

Ratajczak

. Membrane-derived microvesicles: important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia. 2006;20(9):1487–1495. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404296

31.

Zwaal

RFA

Schroit

. Pathophysiologic implications of membrane phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood. 1997;89(4):1121–1132. doi:10.1182/blood.v89.4.1121

32.

del Conde

Shrimpton

Thiagarajan

López

. Tissue-factor-bearing microvesicles arise from lipid rafts and fuse with activated platelets to initiate coagulation. Blood. 2005;106(5):1604–1611. doi:10.1182/blood-2004-03-1095

33.

Taraboletti

D’Ascenzo

Borsotti

Giavazzi

Pavan

Dolo

. Shedding of the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP as membrane vesicle-associated components by endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(2):673–680. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64887-0

34.

Caplan

Dennis

. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98(5):1076–1084. doi:10.1002/jcb.20886

35.

Mathivanan

Simpson

. Exosomes: extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. J Proteomics. 2010;73(10):1907–1920. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2010.06.006

36.

Théry

Ostrowski

Segura

. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(8):581–593. doi:10.1038/nri2567

37.

Jones

Wagers

. No place like home: anatomy and function of the stem cell niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(1):11–21. doi:10.1038/nrm2319

38.

Lozito

Tuan

. Endothelial cell microparticles act as centers of matrix metalloproteinsase-2 (MMP-2) activation and vascular matrix remodeling. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(2):534–549. doi:10.1002/jcp.22744

39.

Beyer

Pisetsky

. The role of microparticles in the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(1):21–29. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2009.229

40.

Elmore

. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516. doi:10.1080/01926230701320337

41.

Dignat-George

Boulanger

. The many faces of endothelial microparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(1):27–33. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.218123

42.

Théry

Boussac

Véron

, et al. Proteomic analysis of dendritic cell-derived exosomes: a secreted subcellular compartment distinct from apoptotic vesicles. The Journal of Immunology. 2001;166(12):7309–7318. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7309

43.

Fries

Blieden

Looney

, et al. Evidence of fibroblast heterogeneity and the role of fibroblast subpopulations in fibrosis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994;72(3):283–292. doi:10.1006/clin.1994.1144

44.

Gieniec

Butler

Worthley

Woods

. Cancer-associated fibroblasts—heroes or villains? Br J Cancer. 2019;121(4):293–302. doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0509-3

45.

. Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1986;315(26):1650–1659.

46.

Dvorak

. Tumors: wounds that do not heal-redux. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(1):1–11. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0209

47.

Gabbiani

. The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J Pathol. 2003;200(4):500–503. doi:10.1002/path.1427

48.

Gabbiani

Ryan

Majno

. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971;27(5):549–550. doi:10.1007/BF02147594

49.

Sappino

A–P

Skalli

Jackson

Schürch

Gabbiani

. Smooth–muscle differentiation in stromal cells of malignant and non–malignant breast tissues. Int J Cancer. 1988;41(5):707–712. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910410512

50.

Mao

Keller

Garfield

Shen

Wang

. Stromal cells in tumor microenvironment and breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32(1–2):303–315. doi:10.1007/s10555-012-9415-3

51.

Kalluri

. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(9):582–598. doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.73

52.

Conklin

Keely

. Why the stroma matters in breast cancer. Cell Adh Migr. 2012;6(3):249–260. doi:10.4161/cam.20567

53.

Galindo-Hernandez

Villegas-Comonfort

Candanedo

, et al. Elevated concentration of microvesicles isolated from peripheral blood in breast cancer patients. Arch Med Res. 2013;44(3):208–214. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.03.002

54.

Lowry

Gallagher

O’Driscoll

. The role of exosomes in breast cancer. Clin Chem. 2015;61(12):1457–1465. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2015.240028

55.

Katanov

Lerrer

Liubomirski

, et al. Regulation of the inflammatory profile of stromal cells in human breast cancer: prominent roles for TNF-α and the NF-κB pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6(1). doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0080-7

56.

Tyan

Kuo

Huang

, et al. Breast cancer cells induce cancer-associated fibroblasts to secrete hepatocyte growth factor to enhance breast tumorigenesis. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e15313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015313

57.

Peng

Zhang

, et al. Tumor-secreted extracellular vesicles promote the activation of cancer-associated fibroblasts via the transfer of microRNA-125b. J Extracell Vesicles. 2019;8(1):1599680. doi:10.1080/20013078.2019.1599680

58.

Yang

Dou

, et al. Breast cancer-derived exosomes regulate cell invasion and metastasis in breast cancer via miR-146a to activate cancer associated fibroblasts in tumor microenvironment. Exp Cell Res. 2020;391(2):111983. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111983

59.

Cho

Park

Lim

Lee

. Exosomes from breast cancer cells can convert adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells into myofibroblast-like cells. Int J Oncol. 2012. doi:10.3892/ijo.2011.1193

60.

Liu

Chen

. Survivin in breast cancer-derived exosomes activates fibroblasts by up-regulating SOD1, whose feedback promotes cancer proliferation and metastasis. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(40):13737–13752. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA120.013805

61.

Chen

Zeng

Zhan

Wang

Jiang

. Aberrant low expression of p85α in stromal fibroblasts promotes breast cancer cell metastasis through exosome-mediated paracrine Wnt10b. Oncogene. 2017;36(33):4692–4705. doi:10.1038/onc.2017.100

62.

Papi

Storci

Guarnieri

, et al. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α/hypoxia inducible factor-1α interplay sustains carbonic anhydrase IX and apoliprotein E expression in breast cancer stem cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54968. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054968

63.

Huang

Zhang

Nan

. Breast cancer stromal fibroblasts promote the generation of CD44 + CD24-cells through SDF-1/CXCR4 interaction. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29(1). doi:10.1186/1756-9966-29-80

64.

Yamamura

Asai

Enomoto

, et al. Akt-girdin signaling in cancer-associated fibroblasts contributes to tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2015;75(5):813–823. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1317

65.

Jiang

Xia

. Intercellular transfer of messenger RNAs in multiorgan tumorigenesis by tumor cell-derived exosomes. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(6):4657–4663. doi:10.3892/mmr.2015.3312

66.

Zhang

. miRNAs in breast cancer tumorigenesis (review). Oncol Rep. 2012;27(4):903–910. doi:10.3892/or.2011.1611

67.

Yom

Noh

Kim

. Clinical significance of high focal adhesion kinase gene copy number and overexpression in invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128(3):647–655. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1150-2

68.

Madan

Smolkin

Cocker

Fayyad

Oktay

. Focal adhesion proteins as markers of malignant transformation and prognostic indicators in breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(1):9–15. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2005.09.024

69.

Hao

Yeo

Guan

. FAK signaling in cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes breast cancer cell migration and metastasis by exosomal miRNAs-mediated intercellular communication. Oncogene. 2020;39(12):2539–2549. doi:10.1038/s41388-020-1162-2

70.

Khan

Yuan

Valenzuela

, et al. Early diagnostic value of survivin and its alternative splice variants in breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(27):35–35. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.30.27_suppl.35

71.

Khan

Jutzy

JMS

Aspe

McGregor

Neidigh

Wall

. Survivin is released from cancer cells via exosomes. Apoptosis. 2011;16(1):1–12. doi:10.1007/s10495-010-0534-4

72.

Katso

Okkenhaug

Ahmadi

White

Timms

Waterfield

. Cellular function of phosphoinositide 3-kinase: implications for development, immunity, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17(1):615–675. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.615

73.

Bilanges

Posor

Vanhaesebroeck

. PI3K isoforms in cell signalling and vesicle trafficking. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(9):515–534. doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0129-z

74.

Yeeravalli

Das

. Molecular mediators of breast cancer metastasis. Hematol/Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2021;14(4):275–289. doi:10.1016/j.hemonc.2021.02.002

75.

Berman

Thukral

Hwang

Solin

Vapiwala

. Incidence and patterns of distant metastases for patients with early-stage breast cancer after breast conservation treatment. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13(2):88–94. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2012.11.001

76.

Donnarumma

Fiore

Nappa

, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts release exosomal microRNAs that dictate an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(12):19592–19608. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14752

77.

Chen

Sang

Song

, et al. Exosomal miR-500a-5p derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes breast cancer cell proliferation and metastasis through targeting USP28. Theranostics. 2021;11(8):3932–3947. doi:10.7150/THNO.53412

78.

Wang

Sun

Zhang

Kang

. Loss of microRNA-30e induced by extracellular vesicles from cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes breast cancer progression by binding to CTHRC1. Exp Mol Pathol. 2021;118:104586. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104586

79.

Pyagay

Heroult

Wang

, et al. Collagen triple helix repeat containing 1, a novel secreted protein in injured and diseased arteries, inhibits collagen expression and promotes cell migration. Circ Res. 2005;96(2):261–268. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000154262.07264.12

80.

Luga

Zhang

Viloria-Petit

, et al. Exosomes mediate stromal mobilization of autocrine Wnt-PCP signaling in breast cancer cell migration. Cell. 2012;151(7):1542–1556. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.024

81.

Luga

Wrana

. Tumor-stroma interaction: revealing fibroblast-secreted exosomes as potent regulators of Wnt-planar cell polarity signaling in cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2013;73(23):6843–6847. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1791

82.

Kim

Jang

Kang

Lee

Cho

. The stromal loss of miR-4516 promotes the FOSL1-dependent proliferation and malignancy of triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020;469:256–265. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.039

83.

Costa-Silva

Aiello

Ocean

, et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(6):816–826. doi:10.1038/ncb3169

84.

Hoshino

Costa-Silva

Shen

, et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature. 2015;527(7578):329–335. doi:10.1038/nature15756

85.

Suetsugu

Honma

Saji

Moriwaki

Ochiya

Hoffman

. Imaging exosome transfer from breast cancer cells to stroma at metastatic sites in orthotopic nude-mouse models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(3):383–390. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.007

86.

Medeiros

Goodale

Postenka

, et al. Triple-negative primary breast tumors induce supportive premetastatic changes in the extracellular matrix and soluble components of the lung microenvironment. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(1):172. doi:10.3390/cancers12010172

87.

Jögi

Ehinger

Hartman

Alkner

. Expression of HIF-1α is related to a poor prognosis and tamoxifen resistance in contralateral breast cancer. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226150. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226150

88.

Engle

Hoying

Boivin

Ormsby

Gartside

Doetschman

. Transforming growth factor beta1 suppresses nonmetastatic colon cancer at an early stage of tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 1999;59(14):3379–3386. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10416598

89.

Flaberg

Markasz

Petranyi

, et al. High-throughput live-cell imaging reveals differential inhibition of tumor cell proliferation by human fibroblasts. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(12):2793–2802. doi:10.1002/ijc.25612

90.

Özdemir

Pentcheva-Hoang

Carstens

, et al. Depletion of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis induces immunosuppression and accelerates pancreas cancer with reduced survival. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(6):719–734. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.005

91.

Pakravan

Babashah

Sadeghizadeh

, et al. MicroRNA-100 shuttled by mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes suppresses in vitro angiogenesis through modulating the mTOR/HIF-1α/VEGF signaling axis in breast cancer cells. Cell Oncol. 2017;40(5):457–470. doi:10.1007/s13402-017-0335-7

92.

Tao

, et al. Elevating microRNA-1-3p shuttled by cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived extracellular vesicles suppresses breast cancer progression and metastasis by inhibiting GLIS1. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021;28(6):634–648. doi:10.1038/s41417-020-00244-x

93.

Santos

Hussain

. Higher glucose enhances breast cancer cell aggressiveness. Nutr Cancer. 2020;72(5):734–746. doi:10.1080/01635581.2019.1654527

94.

Sung

Kang

, et al. ITGB4-mediated Metabolic reprogramming of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2020;39(3):664–676. doi:10.1038/s41388-019-1014-0

95.

Yang

Bucan

Baehre

von der Ohe

Otte

Hass

. Acquisition of new tumor cell properties by MSC-derived exosomes. Int J Oncol. 2015;47(1):244–252. doi:10.3892/ijo.2015.3001

96.

Alamoudi

Alnoury

Gad

. miRNA in tumour metabolism and why could it be the preferred pathway for energy reprograming. Brief Funct Genomics. 2018;17(3):157–169. doi:10.1093/bfgp/elx023

97.

Zhou

Fong

Min

, et al. Cancer-secreted miR-105 destroys vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(4):501–515. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.007

98.

Yan

Zhou

, et al. Cancer-cell-secreted exosomal miR-105 promotes tumour growth through the MYC-dependent metabolic reprogramming of stromal cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(5):597–609. doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0083-6

99.

Liu

Hua

Zhan

, et al. Carcinoma associated fibroblasts small extracellular vesicles with low miR-7641 promotes breast cancer stemness and glycolysis by HIF-1α. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1). doi:10.1038/s41420-021-00524-x

100.

Zhao

Liu

. SNHG3 Functions as miRNA sponge to promote breast cancer cells growth through the metabolic reprogramming. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2020;191(3):1084–1099. doi:10.1007/s12010-020-03244-7

101.

Fong

Zhou

Liu

, et al. Breast-cancer-secreted miR-122 reprograms glucose metabolism in premetastatic niche to promote metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(2):183–194. doi:10.1038/ncb3094

102.

Drake

Jaffee

Pardoll

. Mechanisms of immune evasion by tumors. Adv Immunol. 2006;90:51–81. doi:10.1016/S0065-2776(06)90002-9

103.

Gajewski

Meng

Blank

, et al. Immune resistance orchestrated by the tumor microenvironment. Immunol Rev. 2006;213(1):131–145. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00442.x

104.

Yang

Chan

, et al. Exosomal PD-L1 harbors active defense function to suppress t cell killing of breast cancer cells and promote tumor growth. Cell Res. 2018;28(8):862–864. doi:10.1038/s41422-018-0060-4

105.

Wen

Sceneay

Lima

, et al. The biodistribution and immune suppressive effects of breast cancer-derived exosomes. Cancer Res. 2016;76(23):6816–6827. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0868

106.

Piao

Kim

Hwang

Woo

Zhang

Moon

. Breast cancer cell-derived exosomes and macrophage polarization are associated with lymph node metastasis. Oncotarget. 2018;9(7):7398–7410. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.23238

107.

Clayton

Tabi

. Exosomes and the MICA-NKG2D system in cancer. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2005;34(3):206–213. doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.03.003

108.

Dou

Ren

Han

, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived exosomes suppress immune cell function in breast cancer via the miR-92/PD-L1 pathway. Front Immunol. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.02026

109.

Kythreotou

Siddique

Mauri

Bower

Pinato

. PD-L1. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71(3):189–194. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204853

110.

Liu

Chang

Zhang

Zou

. MicroRNA-9 promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells via down-regulating FOXO1. Clinical and Translational Oncology. 2017;19(3):1133–1140. doi:10.1007/s12094-017-1650-1

111.

Zeng

Wang

, et al. MicroRNA-9 and breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;122:109687. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109687

112.

Baroni

Romero-Cordoba

Plantamura

, et al. Exosome-mediated delivery of miR-9 induces cancer-associated fibroblast-like properties in human breast fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(7):e2312–e2312. doi:10.1038/cddis.2016.224

113.

Libring

Shinde

Chanda

, et al. The dynamic relationship of breast cancer cells and fibroblasts in fibronectin accumulation at primary and metastatic tumor sites. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(5):1270. doi:10.3390/cancers12051270

114.

Najafi

Farhood

Mortezaee

. Extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness and degradation as cancer drivers. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(3):2782–2790. doi:10.1002/jcb.27681

115.

Schwager

Bordeleau

Zhang

Antonyak

Cerione

Reinhart-King

. Matrix stiffness regulates microvesicle-induced fibroblast activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2019;317(1):C82–C92. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00418.2018

116.

Xavier

CPR

Caires

Barbosa

MAG

Bergantim

Guimarães

Vasconcelos

. The role of extracellular vesicles in the hallmarks of cancer and drug resistance. Cells. 2020;9(5):1141. doi:10.3390/cells9051141

117.

Ciravolo

Huber

Ghedini

, et al. Potential role of HER2-overexpressing exosomes in countering trastuzumab-based therapy. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(2):658–667. doi:10.1002/jcp.22773

118.

Zhu

Chen

, et al. Exosomes mediate drug resistance transfer in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and a probable mechanism is delivery of P-glycoprotein. Tumor Biol. 2014;35(11):10773–10779. doi:10.1007/s13277-014-2377-z

119.

Wei

Lai

, et al. Exosomal miR-221/222 enhances tamoxifen resistance in recipient ER-positive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;147(2):423–431. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3037-0

120.

Holton

Bergamaschi

Katzenellenbogen

Bhargava

. Integration of molecular profiling and chemical imaging to elucidate fibroblast-microenvironment impact on cancer cell phenotype and endocrine resistance in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96878. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096878

121.

Mercier

Casimiro

Wang

, et al. Human breast cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) show caveolin-1 downregulation and RB tumor suppressor functional inactivation: implications for the response to hormonal therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7(8):1212–1225. doi:10.4161/cbt.7.8.6220

122.

O’Mahony

Razandi

Pedram

Harvey

Levin

. Estrogen modulates metabolic pathway adaptation to available glucose in breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2012;26(12):2058–2070. doi:10.1210/me.2012-1191

123.

Takenaga

Koshikawa

Nagase

. Intercellular transfer of mitochondrial DNA carrying metastasis-enhancing pathogenic mutations from high- to low-metastatic tumor cells and stromal cells via extracellular vesicles. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(1). doi:10.1186/s12860-021-00391-5

124.

Sansone

Savini

Kurelac

, et al. Packaging and transfer of mitochondrial DNA via exosomes regulate escape from dormancy in hormonal therapy-resistant breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(43). doi:10.1073/pnas.1704862114

125.

Roulois

Loo Yau

Singhania

, et al. DNA-demethylating agents target colorectal cancer cells by inducing viral mimicry by endogenous transcripts. Cell. 2015;162(5):961–973. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.056

126.

Sistigu

Yamazaki

Vacchelli

, et al. Cancer cell–autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Nat Med. 2014;20(11):1301–1309. doi:10.1038/nm.3708

127.

Nabet

Qiu

Shabason

, et al. Exosome RNA unshielding couples stromal activation to pattern recognition receptor signaling in cancer. Cell. 2017;170(2):352–366.e13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.031

128.

Caldas-Lopes

Gomez-Arteaga

Guzman

. Approaches to targeting cancer stem cells in solid tumors. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;14(4):421–427. doi:10.2174/1574888x14666190222164429

129.

Sansone

Berishaj

Rajasekhar

, et al. Evolution of cancer stem-like cells in endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancers is mediated by stromal microvesicles. Cancer Res. 2017;77(8):1927–1941. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2129

130.

Srivastava

Creek

. Discovery and validation of clinical biomarkers of cancer: a review combining metabolomics and proteomics. Proteomics. 2019;19(10):1700448. doi:10.1002/pmic.201700448

131.

Sadovska

Eglitis

Line

. Extracellular vesicles as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(12):6379–6390.

132.

Urabe

Kosaka

Ito

Kimura

Egawa

Ochiya

. Extracellular vesicles as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for cancer. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;318(1):C29–C39. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00280.2019

133.

Chen

Xue

Hsu

, et al. Phosphoproteins in extracellular vesicles as candidate markers for breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(12):3175–3180. doi:10.1073/pnas.1618088114

134.

Kia

Paryan

Mortazavi

Biglari

Mohammadi-Yeganeh

. Evaluation of exosomal miR-9 and miR-155 targeting PTEN and DUSP14 in highly metastatic breast cancer and their effect on low metastatic cells. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(4):5666–5676. doi:10.1002/jcb.27850

Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Communicate with Breast Tumor Cells Through Extracellular Vesicles in Tumor Development

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Extracellular Vesicles

Exosomes

Microvesicles

Apoptotic Bodies

Cancer-associated Fibroblasts

EVs from Breast Cancer Cells Promote CAFs Formation

CAFs-Derived EVs Promote an Aggressive Phenotype in Mammary Tumor Cells

CAFs-Derived EVs Regulate the Metabolism of Mammary Tumor Cells

CAFs-Derived EVs Modulate the Immune Response in the Tumor Microenvironment

CAFs-Derived EVs Modulate Composition of ECM

Chemoresistance in Tumor Cells is Modulated by CAFs-Derived EVs

EVs from Breast Cancer Cells and CAFs as Biomarkers

Conclusion

Footnotes

Abbreviations

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References