Collage-Cyborg-CollectiveBiography is an affective, situated proposition for researching academic subjectivities within the neoliberal university. Drawing on feminist affect theory, the study understands research as a living political practice emerging from everyday embodied academic encounters. Rather than applying predefined methods, this proposition unfolds through an articulation of diverse collective, theoretical-methodological, and experimental practices that foreground vulnerability, fragmentation, and relationality as epistemic resources. By tracing how affects circulate between bodies, institutions, and embodied memories, we explore how inhabiting the affective fractures involving discomfort, death, and life beyond academia can open cracks for epistemic disobedience, resistance, and alternative ways of knowing.
AhmedS. (2019). What’s the use?Duke University Press.
7.
AhmedS. (2021). Vivir una vida feminista. Caja Negra.
8.
AnzaldúaG. (1988). Hablar en lenguas. Una carta a escritoras tercermundistas. Esta puente, mi espalda. Voces de mujeres tercermundistas en los Estados Unidos, 219–228.
9.
AnzaldúaG. (2021a). The Gloria Anzaldúa reader. Duke University Press.
10.
AnzaldúaG. (2021b). Borderlands/La frontera: la nueva mestiza. Capitán Swing Libros.
11.
BhattacharyaK. (2015). The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic De/Colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415615619
BreezeM. (2018). Imposter syndrome as a public feeling. In Yvette Taylor and Kinneret Lahad (Eds), Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights and failures (pp. 191–219). palgrave macmillan.
BurtonS.BowmanB. (2022). The academic precariat: Understanding life and labour in the neoliberal academy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2076387
17.
Butler-KisberL. (2008). Collage as inquiry. In Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 265–276). Sage.
18.
ByrneD. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
19.
CatrileoD. (2019). El nacimiento del río o poética del río: Iñche Daniela Catrileo Pingen. Revista Heterotopías del Área de Estudios Críticos del Discurso de FFyH, 2(4), 1–9.
DaviesB.GannonS. (2006). Doing collective biography: Investigating the production of subjectivity. McGraw-Hill Education.
22.
DespretV.StengersI. (2023). Las que hacen historias. ¿Qué hacen las mujeres al pensamiento?Hekht.
23.
DümmerS. (2012). Sin tropicalismos ni exageraciones: la construcción de la imagen de Chile para la exposición iberoamericana de Sevilla de 1929. RIL Editores.
Fardella CisternasC.Corvalán-NaviaA.Garcia-MenesesJ.Chiappini KoscinaF. (2021). Ni extranjeras, ni secretarias: Discursos de las científicas chilenas sobre el trabajo académico. Pensamiento Educativo, 58(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7764/pel.58.1.2021.11
26.
Garcia-MenesesJ.Enciso DomínguezG.Chanez-CortésI. (2024). Burning toda la mierda’: a schizo-affective poem. Culture and Organization, 30(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2023.2216830
27.
GherardiS. (2017). One turn. and now another one: Do the turn to practice and the turn to affect have something in common?Management Learning, 48(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507616688591
28.
GherardiS.MurgiaA.BelleE.MieleF.CarreriA (2019). Tracking the sociomaterial traces of affect at the crossroads of affect and practice theories. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 14(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-04-2018-1624
29.
GillR. (2016). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In Secrecy and silence in the research process (pp. 228–244). Routledge.
30.
GuizardiM.GonzálvezH.StefoniC. (2025). Cómo destruir la carrera de las científicas sociales. Un anti/manual etnográfico feminista desde Chile. RIL Editores.
31.
HarawayD. (1995) Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: la reinvención de la naturaleza (Vol. 28). Universitat de València.
32.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
33.
HenriksenL.KjærK.BløndM.CohnM.CakiciB.Douglas‐JonesR.FerreiraP.FeshakV.GahooniaS. K.SandbuktS. (2022). Writing bodies and bodies of text: Thinking vulnerability through monsters. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(2), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12782
KnudsenB. T.StageC. (2015). Introduction: Affective methodologies. In Affective methodologies: Developing cultural research strategies for the study of affect (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
LahmanM.TaylorC.BeddesL.BlountI.BontempoK.CoonJ.FernandezC.MotterB. (2020). Research falling out of colorful pages onto paper: Collage inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3-4), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004
37.
LiptonB. (2020). Measures of success: Cruel optimism and the paradox of academic women's participation. In Australian higher education. In Academic Life in the Measured University (pp. 34–45). Routledge.
38.
LundR. (2015). Doing the ideal academic - Gender, excellence and changing academia. [Thesis for opting for a doctoral degree, Aalto University].
39.
MacfarlaneB. (2023). The academic sabbatical as a symbol of change in higher education: From rest and recuperation to hyper-performativity. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(3), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2140888
MankyO.SaraviaS. (2021). From pure academics to transformative scholars? The crisis of the “ideal academic” in a Peruvian university. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(4), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12787
MohantyC. T. (2003). “Under Western Eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(2), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/342914
44.
MøhringC. (2019). Affective politics and involuntary autoethnography: Backlashes against# MeToo. Capacious: Journal for Emerging Affect Inquiry, 1(4), 18. https://doi.org/10.22387/CAP2019.32
45.
Muñoz-GarciaA. L.LiraA.LoncónE. (2022). Knowledges from the south: Reflections on writing academically. Educational Studies, 58(5–6), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2022.2132394
46.
MurrisK.BozalekV. (2019). Diffracting diffractive readings of texts as methodology: Some propositions. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(14), 1504–1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00121857.2019.1570843
47.
ØstbøT. (2021). The cynical university: Gamified subjectity in Norwegian academia. Ephemera, Theory & Politics in Organization, 21(3), 43–71.
48.
PengM. T. (2025). The formalisation of academic subjectivity under constant performance assessment. Journal of Cultural Economy, 18(4), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2024.2320124
49.
PrasadA. (2016). Cyborg writing as a political act: Reading Donna Haraway in organization studies. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(4), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12128
50.
PullenA.RhodesC.ThanemT. (2017). Affective politics in gendered organizations: Affirmative notes on becoming-woman. Organization, 24(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416668367
51.
RhoadesG.SlaughterS. (1997). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply side higher education. Social Text, 51, 9–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/466645
52.
RickettB.MorrisA. (2021). Mopping up tears in the academy’–working-class academics, belonging, and the necessity for emotional labour in UK academia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1834952
53.
Rivera CusicanquiS. (2018). Un mundo ch’ixi es possible. Ensayos desde un presente en crisis. Tinta Limón Ediciones.
54.
RottenbergC. (2020). El auge del feminismo neoliberal. Universitat Jaume I.
55.
SandovalCh. (2004). Nuevas ciencias. Feminismo cyborg y metodología de los oprimidos. In Otras inapropiables: feminismo desde las fronteras (pp. 81–106). Traficantes de sueños.
SeigworthG.GreggM. (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke.
58.
SmithN. (2009). Wangechi mutu: Feminist collage and the cyborg. [Thesis for opting for a master degree, Georgia State University]. https://doi.org/10.57709/1234428
59.
SpringgayS. (2015). “Approximate-rigorous abstractions”: Propositions of activation for posthumanist research in education. In Nathan Snaza and John Weaver (Eds), Posthumanism and Educational Research (pp. 76–88). Routledge.
60.
TaylorY.LahadK. (2018). Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights, and failures. Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
TrumanS. (2021). Feminist speculations and the practice of research-creation: Writing pedagogies and intertextual affects. Routledge.
62.
TrumanS.SpringgayS. (2016). Propositions for walking research. In The Routledge international handbook of intercultural arts research (pp. 259–267). Routledge.
