In this paper, we engage with a new theoretical lens to the field of education for youth with disabilities, crip technoscience, and offer three applications of what we describe as youth crip technoscience. Youth crip technoscience asserts that youth with disabilities are makers and co-creators of disability; that disability is a creative, cultural experience for youth beyond accommodation and intervention; and that school and classrooms paces can be designed to support crip futures and disability justice. Youth crip technoscience as a framework offers a unique approach to research, practice, and activism in educational research with disabled youth that values their ways of knowing, being, and doing and aims to co-create visions of disabled adulthood, disability identity, and disabled futures within and through curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment.
AnastasiouD.BurkeM. D.WileyA. L.KauffmanJ. M. (2024). The telos of special education: A tripartite approach. Exceptionality, 32(2), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2024.2301819
2.
AnastasiouD.KauffmanJ. M. (2012). Disability as cultural difference: Implications for special education. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193251038316
3.
AnnammaS. (2018). Mapping consequential geographies in the carceral state: Education journey mapping as a qualitative method with girls of color with dis/abilities. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417728962
4.
AnnammaS.MorrisonD. (2018). DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching & Teacher Education, 73(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.0085
5.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/Ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
6.
AnnammaS. A.HandyT. (2020). Sharpening justice through DisCrit: A contrapuntal analysis of education. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20953838
7.
ArtilesA. J.TrentS. C. (2023). Disability as an afterthought: Probing the invisibility of ability differences in interdisciplinary advances in learning. Review of Research in Education, 47(1), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X231221532
BargaN. K. (1996). Students with learning disabilities in education: Managing a disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(4), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900409
10.
BossenC. B.KottaszR. (2020). Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers, 21(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186
11.
ErevellesN. (2000). Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory, 50(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2000.00025.x
12.
FritschK. (2016). Cripping neoliberal futurity: Marking the elsewhere and elsewhen of desiring otherwise. Feral Feminisms, 5(1), 11–26.
13.
GarciaA.MirraN. (2023). Other suns: Designing for racial equity through speculative education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2166764
14.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M. (1994). Toward a culture of disability in the aftermath of Deno & dunn. The Journal of Special Education, 27(4), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699402700409
15.
HamraieA. (2023). 29. Crip making. In MillsM.SanchezR. (Eds.), Crip authorship: Disability as method (pp. 303–317). New York University Press.
HeumannJ. (2004). Pioneering disability rights advocate and leader in disabled in action. New York: Center for independent living, Berkeley; world institute on disability; and the US department of education 1960s-2000, an oral history conducted by susan brown, David Landes, Jonathan young in 1998-2001, regional oral history office, the Bancroft Library: University of California. https://oac.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb9v19p0k9&brand=oac4&doc.view=entire_text
18.
KaferA. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
MachadoE.BenekeM. R.LoveH. R. (2024). “So that I may hope to honor you”: Centering wholeness, agency, and brilliance in qualitative research with multiply marginalized young children. Educational Researcher, 53(4), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X241237533
McDermottR. P. (2001). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In ChaiklinS.LaveJ. (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity & context (pp. 269–305). Cambridge University Press.
MillerA. L.PearsonH. (2024). Unearthing and reconstructing schooling with multiply marginalized disabled students through an intersectional sociospatial lens. Race Ethnicity and Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2024.2386940
25.
MirraN.GarciaA. (2022). Guns, schools, and democracy: Adolescents imagining social futures through speculative civic literacies. American Educational Research Journal, 59(2), 345–380. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221074400
26.
MuellerC. (2019). Beyond stigma: Disability identity in school contexts[Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
27.
MuellerC. (2019). Adolescent understandings of disability labels and social stigma in school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1576940
28.
NaraianS. (2016). Spatializing student learning to reimagine the “place” of inclusion. Teachers College Record, 118(12), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611801207
29.
OttK. (2014). Disability things: Material culture and American disability history, 1700–2010. In BurchS.RembisM. (Eds.), Disability histories (pp. 119–135). University of Illinois Press.
30.
PhilipT.GuptaA.ElbyA.TurpenC. (2017). Why ideology matters for learning: A case of ideological convergence in an engineering ethics classroom discussion on drone warfare. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381964
31.
Piepzna-SamarasinhaL. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.
32.
RiceC.ChandlerE.ShanoudaF.Temple JonesC.MundelI. (2024). Misfits meet art and technology: Cripping transmethodologies. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 24(4), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241234705
SelwynN. (2023). The modern classroom chair: Exploring the ‘coercive design’ of contemporary schooling. Power and Education, 16(1), 17577438231163043–17577438231163077. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438231163043
35.
ShakespeareT. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge.
36.
SiutyM. B. (2019). Inclusion gatekeepers: The social production of spatial identities in special education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(8), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1635283
37.
SleeR.CorcoranT.BestM. (2019). Disability studies in education-building platforms to reclaim disability and recognize disablement. Journal of Disability Studies in Education, 1(1–2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888803-00101002
38.
ValleJ. W.ConnorD. (2019). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. Routledge.
39.
Van AmsterdamN.KnoppersA.ClaringbouldI.JongmansM. (2012). ‘It’s just the way it is…’ or not? How physical education teachers categorise and normalise differences. Gender & Education, 24(7), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.677013
