Through a disability studies lens walking-with is explored co-creatively as a relational method to understand the complexities young disabled people face during their transition to postsecondary life. Walking-with is defined by immersion into the lived experiences of young people, fostering an openness to following unpredictable processes in their lives. This approach avoids static representations and instead allows space to follow participants in directing their paths. A long-term collaboration between the authors and three young disabled adults in the postsecondary transition helps to grasp walking-with. The authors understand their position as sensitive allies—spider-sense researchers attuned to subtle, significant signs within the interwoven becoming-processes. Both metaphorical and literal dimensions of walking-with are explored to understand and follow the lives of these young. This article contributes to walking methodologies in which co-creative research illustrates the importance of relational knowledges to listen to the underlying processes that influence how life unfolds for disabled youth.
AllanJ. (2008). Rethinking inclusive education: The philosophers of difference in practice. Springer.
2.
ArendtH. (1992). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1982).
3.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the Universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
4.
BartlettR.KonculA.LidI. M.GeorgeE. O.HaugenI. (2023). Using walking/go along interviews with people in vulnerable situations: A synthesized review of the research literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231164606
5.
BergsonH. (1997). The creative mind: An introduction to metaphysics. Carol Publishing Group. (Original work published 1946).
6.
BergsonH. (2014). Essays over bewustzijn en verandering [Essays on consciousness and change]. ISVW Uitgevers. (Original work published 1911).
7.
BergsonH. (2018). De creatieve evolutie [The creative evolution]. ISVW Uitgevers. (Original work published 1907).
8.
BiklenD. (2020). Presuming competence, belonging, and the promise of inclusion: The US experience. Prospects, 49(3-4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09510-0
9.
BollardM.McLeodE.DolanA. (2018). Exploring the impact of health inequalities on the health of adults with intellectual disability from their perspective. Disability & Society, 33(6), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1459476
ButlerM.DerrettS. (2014). The walking interview: An ethnographic approach to understanding disability. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 12(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2014.1491
12.
ChandlerE.JohnsonM.GoldB.RiceC.BulmerA. (2019). Cripistemologies in the city: ‘Walkingtogether’ as sense-making. Journal of Public Pedagogies, (4), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.15209/jpp.1177
13.
DaviesB. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. Routledge.
14.
DaviesB. (2020). Entanglement in the world’s becoming and the doing of new materialist inquiry. Routledge.
15.
DeleuzeG. (1964). Proust & signs, the complete text. Translated by Richard Howard. University of Minnesota Press.
16.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum.
17.
DocumaciA. (2023). Activist affordances. Duke University Press.
18.
FurlongA. (2009). Revisiting transitional metaphors: Reproducing inequalities under the conditions of late modernity. Journal of Education and Work, 22(5), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080903453979
19.
GjermestadA.LutebergetL.MidjoT.WitsøE. (2017). Everyday life of persons with intellectual disability living in residential settings: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Disability & Society, 32(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1284649
HarawayD. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
22.
HarawayD. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
23.
Hickey-MoodyA.WillcoxM. (2019). Entanglements of difference as community togetherness: faith, art and feminism. Social Sciences, 8(264), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090264
24.
HoggerL.FudgeN.SwinglehurstD. (2023). Supporting inclusion and participation for people living with dementia: Ethnographic and participatory research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231184773
25.
HusnyM.FaschingH. (2020). The consulting of executive practitioners in participative cooperation: How professionals view the inclusive transition process of youths with disabilities in Austria. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1862338
26.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2017). Thinking with theory: A new analytic for qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 717–737). Sage Publications.
27.
KaferA. (2013). Feminist queer crip. Indiana University Press.
28.
LangøyE. E.KvalsundR. (2018). Vulnerable youth – Dependency or independence? School experiences, transitions and adaptation to and within adult life. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 20(1), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.34
29.
Lenz TaguchiH. (2017). “The concept as method”: Tracing-and-mapping the problem of the neuro(n) in the field of education. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616634726
MacLureM. (2024). Transversal inquiry: The “adventure of the involuntary”. In MazzeiL. A.JacksonA. Y. (Eds.), Postfoundational approaches to qualitative inquiry (pp. 243–255). Routledge.
32.
ManningE. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. MIT Press.
33.
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.
MazzeiL. A.JacksonA. Y. (Eds.), (2024). Postfoundational approaches to qualitative inquiry. Routledge.
36.
Molloy MurphyA. (2024). What world is knocking? Responding to a world in crisis with polyphonic storying. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2024.33
37.
MurrayS. (2020). Disability and the posthuman, bodies, technology, and cultural futures. Representations, health, disability, culture and society. Liverpool University Press.
OsgoodJ. (2024). Adventures requiring care and recklessness: A playful archive. In MazzeiL. A.JacksonA. Y. (Eds.), Postfoundational approaches to qualitative inquiry (pp. 101–118). Routledge.
40.
PearsonC.WatsonN.GangneuxJ.NorbergI. (2020). Transition to where and to what? Exploring the experiences of transitions to adulthood for young disabled people. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(10), 1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1820972
RomanskaM. (2024). The bionic body: Technology, disability and posthumanism. Body, Space & Technology, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.11480
44.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. (2020). An introduction to the second edition of the handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities. Routledge.
45.
SpringgayS.TrumanS. E. (2017). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464
46.
SpringgayS.TrumanS. E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: walkingLab. Routledge.
47.
StikerH.-J. (1999). A history of disability. University of Michigan Press.
48.
St PierreE. A. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616636147
49.
St PierreE. A. (2021). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005
50.
TaylorC.FairchildN. (2025, October 6–10). Walking-with theory: Feminist materialist/posthumanist encounters [conference session]. European Congress of Qualitative Inquiry (ECQI).
51.
ThompsonP. (2012). What is concrete about Ernst Bloch’s ‘concrete utopia’? In JacobsenM. H.TesterK. (Eds.), Utopia: Social theory and the future (pp. 33–46). Routledge.
52.
TitchkoskyT.CaguladaE.DeWellesM.GoldE. (Eds.), (2022). DisAppearing: Encounters in disability studies. Canadian Scholars.
53.
VandenbusscheH.ClaesC.De SchauwerE. (2023). Gabria’s life : young adults with a disability in the transition to adulthood. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02032-y
54.
VandenbusscheH.De SchauwerE. (2024). Transitioning to adulthood for young disabled people: imagining new futurities while walking-with. Disability & Society, 40(6), 1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2024.2374499
55.
WelsbyJ.HorsfallD. (2011). Everyday practices of exclusion/inclusion: Women who have an intellectual disability speaking for themselves?Disability & Society, 26(7), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.618731
