Questions,Loneliness,Lists,and Holding Space: Mundane Significance in Qualitative Research Mentoring

Abstract

This article is an investigation of our mentoring relationship in the context of philosophically and theoretically informed qualitative research over the past several years. Specifically, we focus on our work as qualitative researchers from a variety of theoretical and philosophical standpoints. In this article, we think with two theoretical concepts: micro-ethical events and care as a world-making practice along with data from our years-long mentoring relationship. As a result, we describe how we discovered that it is the moments which initially seemed mundane which were most significant in mentoring. We name this contribution as mundane significance, describing three insights for the field of cultural studies: care-full reading practices, making the invisible, visible, and challenging mentor and mentee binaries.

Keywords

mentoring qualitative inquiry micro-ethical care as world making mundane research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiston

S. J.

Jung

(2016). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. Gender & Education, 27(3), 297–316.

Arczynski

A. V.

Christensen

M. C.

Hoover

S. M.

(2018). Fostering critical feminist multicultural qualitative research mentoring. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(8), 954–978.

Brown

R. N.

Carducci

Kuby

C. R.

(Eds.). (2014). Disrupting qualitative inquiry: Possibilities and tensions in educational research. Peter Lang.

Bhattacharya

(2021). Rejecting labels and colonization: In exile from post-qualitative approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 179–184.

Bhattacharya

Liang

(2022). Mentoring as radical interconnectivity and love: Post-oppositional and de/colonial approaches to qualitative research mentoring in higher education. In Guyotte

K. W.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

(Eds.), Philosophical mentoring in qualitative research: Collaborating and inquiring together (pp. 127–146). Routledge.

Bodén

(2021). On, to, with, for, by: Ethics and children in research. Children’s Geographies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1891405

Braidotti

(2022). Posthuman feminism. Polity.

Butler

J. C.

(2019). In their own voices: A phenomenological study of mentorship among women in higher education [Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University].

Calafell

B. M.

(2007). Mentoring and love: An open letter. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 7(4), 425–441.

10.

Erdem

Aytemur

J. Ö

. (2008). Mentoring—A relationship based on trust: Qualitative research. Public Personnel Management, 37(1), 55–65.

11.

Fairchild

(2022). Mentoring as a collective relationality. In Guyotte

K. W.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

(Eds.), Philosophical mentoring in qualitative research: Collaborating and inquiring together (pp. 207–210). Routledge.

12.

Flint

M. A.

Cannon

S. O.

(2022). Becoming feminist swarm: Inquiring mentorship methodologically together. In Guyotte

K. W.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

(Eds.), Philosophical mentoring in qualitative research: Collaborating and inquiring together (pp. 16–35). Routledge.

13.

Gooden

M. A.

Devereaux

C. A.

Hulse

N. E.

(2020). # BlackintheIvory: Culturally responsive mentoring with Black women doctoral students and a Black male mentor. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(4), 392–415.

14.

Grant

C. M.

Simmons

J. C.

(2008). Narratives on experiences of African-American women in the academy: Conceptualizing effective mentoring relationships of doctoral student and faculty. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(5), 501–517.

15.

Guyotte

K. W.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

(Eds.). (2022). Philosophical mentoring in qualitative research: Collaborating and inquiring together. Routledge.

16.

hooks

(1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

17.

Keating

A. L.

(2013). Transformation now! Toward a post-oppositional politics of change. University of Illinois Press.

18.

Kuby

C. R.

(2022). Unfinished: (Post-)Philosophically informed mentoring and relational ethics. In Guyotte

K. W.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

(Eds.), Philosophical mentoring in qualitative research: Collaborating and inquiring together (pp. 108–122). Routledge.

19.

Murris

Bozalek

(2019). Diffraction and response-able reading of texts: The relational ontologies of Barad and Deleuze. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 872–886.

20.

Nash

J. C.

(2011). Practicing love: Black feminism, love-politics, and post-intersectionality. Meridians, 11(2), 1–24.

21.

Nash

J. C.

(2019). Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Duke University Press.

22.

Nordstrom

S. N.

(2022). String figure mentoring in a qualitative inquiry assemblage. In Guyotte

K. W.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

(Eds.), Philosophical mentoring in qualitative research: Collaborating and inquiring together (pp. 188–206). Routledge.

23.

Panos

Uttamchandani

Lester

J. N.

(2021). Beyond “doing no harm”: Saddle points in anonymization and masking as socialized practices for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(9), 871–885.

24.

Pérez

M. S.

Pasque

P. A.

(2013). Challenging the neoliberal climate in academia from mentoring perspectives: Critical reflections from our future selves. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(6), 474–480.

25.

Puar

J. K.

(2012). “I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess”: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. philoSOPHIA, 2(1), 49–66.

26.

Puar

J. K.

(2017). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times (10th anniversary ed.). Duke University Press. (Original work published 2007)

27.

Puig de la Bellacasa

(2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

28.

Sambunjak

Straus

S. E.

Marusic

(2010). A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 72–78.

29.

Schwartzman

(2017). Unma (s) king education in the image of business: A vivisection of educational consumerism. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(4), 333–346.

30.

Snoeren

M. M.

Raaijmakers

Niessen

T. J.

Abma

T. A.

(2016). Mentoring with (in)care: A co-constructed auto-ethnography of mutual learning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 3–22.

31.

Watson

V. T.

Smith

F. A.

Gooden

(2024). Stitching narratives: Poetic autoethnography of Black women’s mentorship in academia. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 24(3), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241226922

32.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

Jordan

L. S.

(2023). “Will you be our qualitative methodologist?” Reflections on grant work responsibilities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–10.

33.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

Marn

T. M.

Barko

Weaver-Hightower

M. B.

(2021). Radical uncertainty is not enough: (In)justice matters of post-qualitative research. International Review of Qualitative Research, 14(4), 575–593.