We have encountered the views of research as apolitical, ahistorical, aculture, and value free: the most powerful weapon for the imposition of Western-Eurocentric thought. It does not embrace the voice and epistemology of Othered people. Against this backdrop, we offer significant features of postcolonial autoethnography. It has three major attributes: exploring the colonial legacy for revitalizing others, dialectical reasoning to create a synergy of meaning perspectives, and metaphor of transformative praxis to bring a paradigm shift. Likewise, we describe three ethical considerations: empathy, inclusiveness, and healing, which possibly help empower the researcher and research participants to become conscious citizens.
AdamsJ.LuitelB. C.AfonsoE.TaylorP. C. (2008). A cogenerative inquiry using postcolonial theory to envisage culturally inclusive science education. Cultural Studies of Science, 3(4), 999–1019.
AdamsT. E.JonesS. H.EllisC. (2021). Introduction: Making sense and taking action. In AdamsT. E.Holman JonesS.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (2nd ed., pp. 1–19). Routledge.
4.
AndreottiV. (2011). Actionable postcolonial theory in education. Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BhargavaR. (2013). Overcoming the Epistemic injustice. Global Policy, 4(4), 413–417.
6.
BhattS. R.MehrotraA. (2000). Buddhist epistemology. Greenwood Press.
7.
BishopA. J. (1990). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race and Class, 32(2), 51–64.
8.
CarpenterD. (2018). Ethic, reflexivity and virtue. In RionI.MartinT. (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research ethic (pp. 35–50). SAGE.
9.
CesaireA. (1955). Discourse on colonialism. Monthly Review Press.
10.
ChilisaB.MajorT. E.Khudu-PetersenK. (2017). Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm. Quality Research, 17, 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117696176
11.
CunneenC.RoweS.TauriJ. (2016). Fracturing the colonial paradigm: Indigenous epistemologies and methodologies, méthod(e)s. African Review of Social Sciences Methodology, 2(1–2), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754745.2017.1354548
12.
DavisL. S. (2010). Advaita Vedanta and zen Buddhism: Deconstructive mode of spiritual inquiry. Continuum.
13.
DeiG. (2008). Indigenous knowledge studies and the next generation: Pedagogical possibilities for anti-colonial education. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37(S1), 5–3. https://doi.org/10.1357/S1326011100000326
14.
DenzinN. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16.
15.
DenzinN. K. (2019). The death of data in neoliberal times. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 721–724.
16.
ErnestP. (2016). Mathematics education ideologies and globalization. In PaulE.BharathS.NualaE. (Eds.), Critical mathematics education: Theory, praxis and reality (pp. 35–679). Information Age.
FernandesF. S.GiraldoV.MatosD. (2022). The decolonial stance in mathematics education: Pointing out action for the construction of a political agenda. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(1), 6–27.
19.
FreireP. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (MyraB. R., Trans.). Continuum.
20.
FreireP. (2005). Education for critical consciousness. Continuum.
GramsciA. (1971). Selection from the prison notebooks (HoareQ.SmithG., Ed. & Trans.). International Publishers.
23.
GrundyS. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. The Flamer Press.
24.
GullionJ. S.TiltonA. (2020). Researching with a decolonizing approach to community-based action research. Brill Sense.
25.
HabermasJ. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (JeremyJ. S., Trans.). Beacon Press.
26.
HeldM. B. E. (2019). Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: An unsettling, mutual, and Collaborative effort. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918821574
27.
HirstJ. G. S. (2005). Samkara’s Advaita Vedanta: A way of teaching. Routledge Curzon.
28.
JohnsC., (Ed.). (2017). Becoming a reflective practitioner. John Wiley & Sons.
29.
KanuY. (2005). Tensions and dilemmas of cross-cultural transfer of knowledge post-structural/postcolonial reflections on an innovative teacher education in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development, 25, 493–513.
30.
KoiralaK. P.KoiralaB. N.GurungG. P. (2021). Epistemological understanding of science embedded within Shad Darsana and Buddhist philosophy. Space and Culture, India, 9(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v9i2.1137
31.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
32.
LuitelB. C. (2013). Mathematics as an im/pure knowledge system: Symbiosis, (w)holism and synergy in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 65–87.
33.
LuitelB. C. (2019). Journey towards a multiparadigmatic transformative research program: An East-West symbiosis. In TaylorP. C.LuitelB. C. (Eds.), Research as transformative learning for sustainable futures: Glocal voices and visions (pp. 19–37). Brill Sense.
LuitelB. C.TaylorP. C. (2010). What is ours and what is not ours? Inclusive imaginings of contextualized mathematics teacher education. In TippinsD. J.MuellerM. P.van EijckM.AdamsJ. (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of eco-justice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (pp. 385–408). Springer.
36.
MasekoP. B. N. (2018). Transformative praxis through critical consciousness: A conceptual exploration of a decolonial access with success agenda. Educational Research for Social Change, 7, 78–90.
37.
MezirowJ. (1991). Transformative dimension of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
38.
MezirowJ. (2012). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformative theory. In TaylorE. W.CarantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 73–96). Jossey-Bass.
39.
MorganK. P.PillayD.NaickerI. (2021). Autoethnography as/in higher education. In TonyE. A.StacyH. T.CarolynE. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (2nd ed., pp. 215–227). Routledge.
40.
MurtiT. R. V. (2008). The central philosophy of Buddhism: A study of Mādhyamika system. Routledge.
41.
NaomiS. S. (2021). Writing a doctoral thesis in a non-western voice. In CecileB.BrittanyA.JamesB. (Eds.), Re-imaging doctoral writing. University Press of Colorado.
42.
NavarroO. (2018). We can’t do this alone: Validation and inspiring social justice teaching through a community of transformative praxis. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(3), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.10801033626784.2018.1468212
43.
ParaskevaJ. M. (2016). Epistimicides: Toward an itinerant curriculum theory. Curriculum: Decanoning the Field, 491, 261–289.
44.
Pensoneau-ConwayS. L. (2012). Understanding identity through dialogue: Paulo Freire and intercultural communication pedagogy. In BardhanN.OrbeM. P. (Eds.), Identity research in intercultural communication (pp. 33–50). Lexington.
45.
QutoshiS. B. (2015). Auto/ethnography: A transformative research paradigm. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 9, 161–190.
46.
RadziwillN. M.BentonM. C.MoellersC. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Reframing what it means to learn. The STEAM Journal, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20150201.3
47.
ReaganT. (2018). Non-western educational traditions: Local approaches to thought and practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
48.
RescherN. (2006). Philosophical dialectics: An essay on metaphilosophy. State University of New York Press.
49.
RichardsonL. S.PierreE. A. (2017). Writing: A method of inquiry. In NormanD.YvonnaS. L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1410–1444). SAGE.
50.
ShieldsC. M. (2018). Becoming a transformative leader: A guide to creating equitable schools. Routledge.
51.
SloteM. (2007). The ethics of care and empathy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Groups.
52.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
53.
TakayamaK.SriprakashA.ConnellR. (2016). Toward a postcolonial comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 61(S2), Article 690455.
54.
TarcA. M. (2018). Poststructuralism, postcolonialism, and education. In MichaelA. P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1936–1941). Springer.
55.
TaylorP. C. (2014). Contemporary qualitative research: Towards an integral research perspective. In AbellS. K.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Handbook on research on science education (pp. 113–169). Routledge.
56.
TaylorP. C.MedinaM. (2011). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to pluralism. College Research Journal, 1(1), 1–16.
57.
TaylorP. C.TaylorE. (2019). Transformative STEAM education for sustainable development. In RahmawatiY.TaylorP. C. (Eds.), Empowering science and mathematics for global competitiveness: Proceedings of the science and mathematics international conference (SMIC, 2018) (pp. 125–131). CRC Press.
58.
TaylorP. C.TaylorE.LuitelB. C. (2012). Multi-paradigmatic transformative research as/for teacher education: An integral perspective. In TobinK. G.FraserB. J.McRobbieC. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 373–387). Springer.
59.
ThambinathanV. S.KinsellaE. A. (2021). Decolonizing methodology in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Method, 20, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
60.
ToyosakiS. (2018). Toward de/postcolonial autoethnography: Critical relationality with the academic second persona. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708617735133
61.
van StamG. (2017). The coming-of-age of super-colonialism. In MunyaradziM.TapuwaR. M. (Eds.), African studies in the academy: The cornucopia of theory, praxis and transformation in Africa? (pp. 13–40) Langaa Research.
62.
WagleS. K.LuitelB. C.KroghE. (2019). Irrelevance of basic school education in Nepal: An anti-colonial critique on problems and prospects. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 13, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v13i0.24032
63.
WesterhoffJ. (2009). Naraguan’s Madhyamaka: A philosophical introduction. Oxford University Press.
64.
WillisJ. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. SAGE.
65.
WongC. W. (2006). Understanding dialectical thinking from a cultural-historical perspective. Philosophical Psychology, 19(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500462420
66.
YoungR. J. C. (2016). Postcolonialism: An historical introduction, anniversary edition. John Wiley & Sons.
