Abstract
Lorde’s “call” lies at the heart of the article I propose to present, engaging with the question, “How can notions of glitch, many-worlds, intra-activity and entanglement contribute to the creation of ‘new tools’—tools that offer alternatives to binary forms of thinking and doing research—in practice?” “We” researchers, scholars, and practitioners engaged here, now, wanting to rethink emancipatory practices for complex times, will need to interrogate what “haunts” our research material-discursively, right down to our very atoms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barad
K.
(2007 ). Meeting the universe halfway . Duke University Press .
2.
de la Cadena
M.
Blaser
M.
(2018 ). World of many worlds . Duke University Press .
3.
Golding
J.
Reinhart
M.
Paganelli
M.
(2021 ). Data loam . De Gruyter .
4.
Haraway
D.
(2016 ). Staying with the trouble . Duke University Press .
5.
Lorde
A.
(2017 ). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house . Random House . (Original work published 1982)
6.
MacCormack
P.
(2020 ). The ahuman manifesto . Bloomsbury .
7.
Murris
K.
(2022 ). Karen Barad as educator . Springer Nature .
8.
Nail
T.
(2020 ). Theory of the image . Oxford University Press .
9.
Olufemi
L.
(2021 ). Experiments in imagining otherwise . Hajar Press .
10.
Russell
L
. (2020 ). Glitch feminism . Verso .
11.
Tsing
A.
(2015 ). The mushroom at the end of the world . Princeton University Press .
12.
Yusof
K.
(2018 ). A billion Black Anthropocenes or none . University of Minnesota Press .