In this article, we examine the connection between how we imagine carbon, energy and energy futures, and carbon use. We argue that to act on climate change we must reframe our cultural understanding carbon. Where children have often been left out of discussions of carbon use, we bring children into these conversations about carbon consumption and imaginaries through examining contemporary perspectives on posthumanism and energy cultures. We demonstrate that children’s imaginative renderings of possible climate change solutions offer an effectively very different way of connecting with climate change, perhaps a more motivating and inspiring means of relating to the more than human world and reworking our entanglements with energy cultures.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
2.
BerlantL. (2016). The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 393–419.
3.
BirchT. (2016). Climate change, mining and traditional indigenous knowledge in Australia. Social Inclusion, 4(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i1.442
4.
BraidottiR. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity.
5.
BrownleeM. T.PowellR. B.HalloJ. C. (2013). A review of the foundational processes that influence beliefs in climate change: Opportunities for environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.683389
6.
Cutter-MackenzieA.RousellD. (2019). Education for what? Shaping the field of climate change education with children and young people as co-researchers. Children’s Geographies, 17(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1467556
7.
DijkstraE. M.GoedhartM. J. (2012). Development and Validation of the ACSI: Measuring students’ science attitudes, pro-environmental behaviour, climate change attitudes and knowledge. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 733–749.
8.
FrostS. (2016). Biocultural creatures: Towards a new theory of the human. Duke University Press.
9.
GabrysJ. (2011). Digital rubish: A natural history of electronics. University of Michigan Press.
10.
GabrysJ. (2014). A cosmopolitics of energy: Diverging materialities and hesitating practices. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2095–2109. https://doi.org/10.1068/a468
11.
GreenD.KingU.MorrisonJ. (2009). Disproportionate burdens: The multidimensional impacts of climate change on the health of Indigenous Australians. The Medical Journal of Australia, 190(1), 1–3.
12.
Hickey-MoodyA. (2015). Carbon fibre masculinity. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 20(1), 139–153.
13.
Hickey-MoodyA. (2017). Arts practice as method, urban spaces and intra-active faiths. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(11), 1083–1096.
14.
Hickey-MoodyA. (2018). New materialism, ethnography, and socially engaged practice: Space-time folds and the agency of matter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26:, 7724–7732.
15.
Hickey-MoodyA. (2019a). Carbon futures: Masculine economies, performative materialities. In Hickey-MoodyA. (Ed.), Deleuze and masculinity (pp. 149–180). Springer International.
Hickey-MoodyA.WillcoxM. (2019). Entanglements of difference as community togetherness: Faith, art and feminism. Social Sciences, 8(9), Article 264.
18.
IvakhivA. (2018). Shadowing the anthropocene: Eco-realism for turbulent times. Punctum Books.
19.
MaloneK. (2016). Children in the anthropocene: Rethinking sustainability and child friendliness in cities. Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
McCormackD. P. (2017). Elemental infrastructures for atmospheric media: On stratospheric variations, value and the commons. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3), 418–437.
21.
MukherjeeR. (2020). Radiant infrastructures: Media, environment, and cultures of uncertainty. Duke University Press.
22.
MurrisK. (2016). The posthuman child: Educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. Routledge.
23.
RousellD.Cutter-MackenzieA.FosterJ. (2017). Children of an earth to come: Speculative fiction, geophilosophy and climate change education research. Special Issue for Educational Studies, 53(6), 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369086
24.
RousellD.Cutter-Mackenzie-KnowlesA. (2020). Uncommon worlds: Towards an ecological aesthetics of childhood in the anthropocene. In Cutter-Mackenzie-KnowlesA.MaloneK.Barratt HackingE. (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature: Assemblages of childhood and nature research (pp. 1657–1680). Springer Nature.
25.
SelbyD.KagawaF. (2010). Runaway climate change as challenge to the “closing circle” of education for sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 37–50.
26.
ShellerM. (2014). Aluminium dreams: The making of light modernity. MIT press.
27.
StraussS.RuppS.LoveT. (2013). Introduction: Powerlines: Cultures of energy in the twenty-first century. In StraussS.RuppS.LoveT. (Eds.), Cultures of energy: Power, practices, technologies (pp. 10–40). Left Coast Press.
28.
TsingA. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
29.
TyfieldD. (2014). “King Coal is dead! Long live the king!”: The paradoxes of Coal’s resurgence in the emergence of global low-carbon societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414537910
30.
WilsonS. (2018). Energy imaginaries: Feminist and decolonial futures. In BellamyB. R.DiamantiJ. (Eds.), Materialism and the critique of energy (pp. 377–412). MCM.
