Allyship is a complicated idea laden with multiple, layered assumptions. One should not presume that allyship conceptually permeates all social justice movements. One should not presume that allyships develop to combat or dismantle a predefined socially constructed ism. A critical interrogation of allyship and allyship constructions necessitates recognition of broader, universal tenets of allyships anywhere. This must go further to embrace the nuanced, situated, dynamic, critically problematic, and complex dimensions rooted in individual lived experiences intersecting multiple marginalizations which contribute as praxis toward an actualizing of individual allyships. Although we will blur constructed distinctions as we progress, here, we endeavor to surface and deliberate upon the derivations and functions and shapes of allyships between two demographic categories, made arbitrarily distinct here for the purposes of engaging in discursive analysis: cisgender heterosexual Black women and cisgender gay White men. In short, we are proposing a way to view this allyship as bidirectional allyships, grounded in social justice frames of existing: a way to see each respective group as traveling within their own lane down a collectively traveled highway. Each traverses the space along their own course, traveling down “their own road.”
BachhoferA. (2020). Homophile movement. In PiercesonJ. (Ed.), LGBTQ Americans in the U.S. Political System: An encyclopedia of activists, voters, candidates, and officeholders: A-L (pp. 207–209). ABC-CLIO.
4.
BellL. A. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M.AdamsL. A.Bell with GoodmanD. J.JoshiK. Y. (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 3–26). Routledge.
5.
BlandB. N.MontemurroB. (2015). The effects of watching Real Housewives of Atlanta on attitudes about sexuality and relationships. Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationships, 2(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2015.0016
ByrdR. D. (2016). Race and sexuality: Whitewashing representation. In CampbellC. P. (Ed.), The Routledge companion to media and race (pp. 304–311). Routledge.
8.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
9.
CollinsP. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. Routledge.
10.
The Combahee River Collective. (2017). The Combahee River Collective statement. In K.-Y.Taylor (Ed.), How we get free: Black feminism and The Combahee River Collective (pp. 15–27). Haymarket Books.
11.
CorriganL. (2019). Queering the Panthers: Rhetorical adjacency and Black/Queer liberation politics. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, 6(2), 1–25.
12.
CraigC. J.YouJ.OhS. (2015). Pedagogy through the pearl metaphor: Teaching as a process of ongoing refinement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(6), 757–781.
13.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
14.
DominguezP. (2015). “I’m very rich, bitch!”: The melodramatic money shot and the excess of racialized gendered affect in the Real Housewives Docusoaps. Camera Obscura, 30(1), 115–183. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-2885486
15.
Evans-WintersV. (2005). Teaching Black girls: Resiliency in urban classrooms. Peter Lang.
16.
Evans-WintersV.EspositoJ. (2010). Other people’s daughters: Critical race feminism and black girls’ education. Educational Foundations, 24(1), 11–1.
17.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction. Random House.
GoodmanD. (2011). Promoting diversity and social justice: Educating people from privileged groups. Routledge.
20.
HolsteinJ. A. (2018). Advancing a constructionist analytics. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 395–410). SAGE.
JohnsonD. (2004). The lavender scare: The Cold War persecution of gays and lesbians in the federal government. University of Chicago Press.
23.
KissickT. (1995). Freaking fag revolutionaries: New York’s Gay Liberation Front, 1969-1971. Radical History Review, 62, 104–134.
24.
LadnerJ.A. (1987). Black teenage pregnancy: A challenge for educators. The Journal of Negro Education, 56(1), pp. 53–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295383
OlesenV. (2018). Feminist qualitative research in the millennium’s first decade: Developments, challenges, prospects. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 151–175). SAGE.
28.
PiontekT. (2009). Homophile movement. In HawleyJ. C. (Ed.), LGBTQ America today: An encyclopedia, Volume 2: G-O (pp. 559–561). Greenwood Press.
ThomasA. J.HackerJ. D.HoxhaD. (2011). Gendered racial identity of Black young women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 64(7–8), 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9939-y
WarnerK. J. (2015). They gon’ think you loud regardless: Ratchetness, reality television, and Black womanhood. Camera Obscura, 30(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-2885475
43.
WilsonA. (1996). How we find ourselves: Identity development and Two Spirit people. Harvard Educational Review, 66(2), 303–317.
44.
WingA. K. (2000). Global critical race feminism for the twenty-first century. In WingA. K. (Ed.), Global critical race feminism: An international reader (pp. 1–23). New York University Press.
