Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-6
Rethinking Social Inquiry in the Wake of Science Studies: Transdisciplinary Pursuits in Times of Climate Change,Information Flows,and Fading Democracies
Our aim for this special issue of Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies is to engage with current influential texts in Science Studies, addressing the urgent need to rethink the role of the sciences in transdisciplinary possibilities for social inquiry. In this introductory essay, we underscore the political stakes of this kind of work, and we focus on a few key themes that run across the collected articles, situated as they are within what scientists call the Anthropocene.
CooleD.FrostS. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
DanowskiD.Viveiros de CastroE. (2017). The ends of the world (NunesR., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
14.
de FreitasE. (2016). The new empiricism of the fractal fold: Rethinking monadology in digital times. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 224-234.
15.
de FreitasE. (2018). The biosocial subject: Sensor technology and worldly sensibility. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39, 292-308.
16.
de FreitasE. (2019). Digital research methods and sensor technologies: Rethinking the temporality of digital life. In LynchJ.RowlandJ.GaleT.ParkerS. (Eds.), Practice methodologies in education research. New York: Routledge
17.
de FreitasE.Dixon-RománE. (2017). The computational turn in educational research: Critical and creative perspectives on the digital data deluge. Research in Education, 98, 3-13.
18.
de FreitasE.Dixon-RománE.LatherP. (2016). Alter-native ontologies of number: Rethinking the quantitative in computational culture. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 431-434.
19.
de FreitasE.LupinacciJ.PaisA. (2017). Science and technology studies x educational studies: Critical and creative perspectives on the future of STEM education. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 53, 551-559.
20.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). Thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
DespretV. (2016). What would animals say if we asked the right questions?Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
DrummondC.FischhoffB. (2017). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 9587-9592. doi:10.1073/pnas.1704882114
FlaxmanG. (2019). Out of control: From political economy to political ecology. In BraidottiR.BignalleS. (Eds.), Posthuman ecologies: Complexity and process after Deleuze (pp. 205-222). London, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
FleckL. (1981). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1935)
26.
FullerS. (2000). Thomas Kuhn: A philosophical history of our times. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
GabrysJ. (2016). Program earth: Environmental sensing, technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
GauchatG. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167-187.
29.
HansenM. (2014). Feed-forward: On the future of 21st century media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
HanssonS. (2017). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 63, 39-47. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002
31.
HarawayD. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HarawayD. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
HaylesN. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
HelmreichS. (2009). Alien Ocean: Anthropological voyages in microbial seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
HörlE. (Ed.). (2018). General ecology: The new ecological paradigm. London, England: Bloomsbury Publishing.
36.
IsaacsonW. (2017). Leonardo Da Vinci. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
37.
KittlerF. (2013). The truth of the technological world: Essays on the genealogy of presence (ButlerE., Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
LatourB. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
39.
LatourB.WoolgarS. (1989). Laboratory life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1979)
40.
McKittrickK. (2015). Sylvia Wynter: On being human as praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
MirowskiP. (2004). The effortless economy of science?Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
MirowskiP. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial Meltdown. London, England: Verso.
43.
MooneyC. (2006). The republican war on science. New York, NY: Basic Books.
44.
MoserK. (2016). The encyclopedia philosophy of Michel Serres: Writing the modern world and anticipating the future. Augusta, GA: Anaphora Literary Press.
45.
NetzR. (2017). The concept of infinity. In de FreitasE.SinclairN.ColesA. (Eds.), What is a mathematical concept? (pp. 36-54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PittinskyT. (2015). America’s crisis of faith in science. Science, 348, 511-512.
47.
PovinelliE. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
ProteviJ. (2013). Life, war, earth: Deleuze and the sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49.
SerresM. (2015). Rome: The first book of foundations. London, England: Bloomsbury Press. (Original work published 1983)
50.
SerresM. (2015). Statues: The second book of foundations. London, England: Bloomsbury Press. (Original work published 1987)
51.
SerresM. (2012). Biogea. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
ShapinS. (2010). Never pure: Historical studies of science as if it was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture, and society, and struggling for credibility and authority. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
53.
SimondonG. (2017). On the mode of existence of technical objects (MalaspinaC.RogoveJ., Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.
54.
SklootR. (2011). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York, NY: Broadway Paperbacks.
55.
StengersI. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. London, England: Polity Press.
56.
StevensH. (2013). Life out of sequence: A data-driven history of bioinformatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
StieglerB. (2015). Automatic society: The future of work (Vol. 1). London, England: Polity Press.
58.
ToulminS. E. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed books.
60.
WeaverJ. A. (2010). Educating the posthuman: Biosciences, fiction, and curriculum studies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
61.
WeaverJ. A. (2018). Science, democracy, and curriculum studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
62.
WilsonE. (2015). Gut feminism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
63.
YusoffK. (2018). A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
