Styled as a letter to my multiple selves, this autoethnography performs a cultural politics of gentrification embodied in my journeys as a community activist, urban planning practitioner, and scholar collaborating with marginalized communities of color in cities. Based on these experiences I uniquely theorize displacement by engaging my affective feelings of empowerment, complicity, melancholy, and self-healing. Critically theorizing my various selves in dialogue with social context, I map my intersectional identities onto larger discourses of community advocacy, racial capitalism, subaltern studies, and decolonization. Ultimately, I argue that another radical self/us/we is possible and point to present-day forms of community organizing and popular education that offer pathways to resist displacement and transform cities toward the arc of social justice.
ClayP. L.HollisterR. M. (1983). Neighborhood policy and planning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
10.
DuttaM. J. (2018). Autoethnography as decolonization, decolonizing autoethnography: Resisting to build our homes. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 18, 94-96.
11.
EllisC. (2002). Being real: Moving inward toward social change. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 399-406.
12.
EllisC. (2016). Revision: Autoethnographic reflections on life and work. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
EscobarA. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
FanonF. (1963). The wretched of the earth. New York, NY: Grove Press.
15.
FloridaR. (2017). The new urban crisis: How our cities are increasing inequality, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class—And what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
16.
FreireP. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London, England: Bloomsbury Publishing. (Original work published 1968)
17.
GlaeserE. L.KimH.LucaM. (2018). Measuring gentrification: Using yelp data to quantify neighborhood change (No. w24952). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
18.
HealeyP. (1999). Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 111-121.
19.
JacobsJ. M. (1996). Edge of empire: Postcolonialism and the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
LeesL.SlaterT.WylyE. K. (Eds.) (2010). The gentrification reader (Vol. 1). London, England: Routledge.
21.
LeggS.McFarlaneC. (2008). Ordinary urban spaces: Between postcolonialism and development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40, 6-14.
22.
MelamedJ. (2011). Represent and destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Reed-DanahayD. (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
24.
RoyA. (2011a). Placing planning in the world—Transnationalism as practice and critique. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 406-415.
25.
RoyA. (2011b). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, 223-238.
26.
SaidE. (1979). Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
27.
SchlichtmanJ. J.PatchJ.HillM. L. (2017). Gentrifier. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
28.
SpivakG. C. (2015). Can the subaltern speak?. In WilliamsP.ChrismanL. (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 66-111). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
SpryT. (2018). Autoethnography and the other: Performative embodiment and a bid for utopia. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
ToyosakiS.Pensoneau-ConwayS. L. (2013). Autoethnography as a praxis of social justice: Three ontological contexts. In Holman JonesS.AdamsT.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 557-575). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
VillanuevaG. (2016). Filipinos for Garcetti: Ethnic political organizing and Asian American civic engagement in cities. Asian American Policy Review, 26, 10-19.
32.
VillanuevaG.GonzalezC.SonM.MorenoE.LiuW.Ball-RokeachS. (2017). Bringing local voices into community revitalization: Engaged communication research in Urban planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45, 474-494.
33.
WatsonV. (2009). Seeing from the south: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46, 2259-2275.
34.
Wolf-PowersL. (2009). Keeping counterpublics alive in planning. In MarcuseP.ConnollyJ.NovyJ.OlivoI.PotterC.SteilJ. (Eds.), Searching for the just city: Debates in urban theory and practice (pp. 161-172). New York, NY: Routledge.
