Seen from a critical intersectional perspective, the experiences of bilinguals are embedded in liminal spaces between language and cultural practices. Yet, rather than leverage these novel and hybrid practices for learning, dominant paradigms in education have historically subtracted nondominant students’ home languages from their communicative resources. To similar effect, current trends in bilingual education promote language separation for equal development of languages severed from each other and from cultural contexts. Such reductive approaches to language education disregard the dynamic and heteroglossic language use documented in bilingual communities. Drawing on in-depth interviews with youth, written reflections, and artifacts of bilingualism, I explore these practices across/between languages by conceptualizing bilingualism as a borderland navigated by Spanish–English bilingual youth. Considering bilingualism as a liminal position foregrounds moments of tension and transition in the language and schooling trajectories of youth as they navigate the anguish and advantage of living in-between. Furthermore, I highlight the methodological implications of framing bilingualism as a borderland to inform research design in language and education fields.
AnzaldúaG. (1990). Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
3.
AnzaldúaG. (2002). Now let us shift . . . the path of conocimiento . . . inner work, public acts. In AnzaldúaG.KeatingA. (Eds.), This Bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 540-578). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (HolquistM., Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BenmayorR. (2012). Digital testimonio as a signature pedagogy for Latin@ studies. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45, 507-524. doi:10.1080/10665684.2012.698180
6.
BernalD. D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in education research. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 555-582.
7.
BernalD. D. (2001). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestiza consciousness of Chicana students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 623-639. doi:10.1080/09518390110059838
8.
BernalD. D.BurciagaR.CarmonaJ. F. (2012). Chicana/Latina testimonios: Mapping the methodological, pedagogical, and political. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45, 363-372. doi:10.1080/10665684.2012.698149
9.
BurciagaM. R. (2007). Chicana Ph.D. students living nepantla: Educación and aspirations beyond the doctorate (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
10.
CalderónD.BernalD. D.HuberL. P.MalagónM.VélezV. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 513-539. doi:10.17763/haer.82.4.l518621577461p68
11.
CantúN. (2012). Getting there Cuando no hay Camino (when there is no path): Paths to discovery testimonios by Chicanas in STEM. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45, 472-487. doi:10.1080/10665684.2012.698936
12.
CreeseA.BlackledgeA. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?The Modern Language Journal, 94, 103-115.
13.
CreswellJ. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CruzC. (2001). Toward an epistemology of a brown body. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 657-669. doi:10.1080/09518390110059874
15.
CruzC. (2012). Making curriculum from scratch: Testimonio in an urban classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45, 460-471. doi:10.1080/10665684.2012.698185
16.
CumminsJ. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 10, 221-240.
17.
ElenesC. A.BernalD. (2010). Latina/o education and the reciprocal relationship between theory and practice. In MurilloE. G.VillenasS.GlavanR. T.MuñozJ. S.MartinezC.Machado-CasasM. (Eds.), Handbook of Latinos and education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 62-89). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
19.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 149-171. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
20.
GarcíaO. (2009a). Bilingual education in the 21st century. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
21.
GarcíaO. (2009b). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a name?TESOL Quarterly, 43, 322-326.
22.
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ. A. (2010). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English language learners. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
GarcíaO.WeiL. (2014). Translanguaging, language, bilingualism and education. London, England: Springer.
24.
GonzalezF. E. (2001). Haciendo que hacer—Cultivating a Mestiza worldview and academic achievement: Braiding cultural knowledge into educational research, policy, practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 641-656. doi:10.1080/09518390110059847
25.
GrinbergJ.SaavedraE. R. (2000). The constitution of bilingual/ESL education as a disciplinary practice: Genealogical explorations. Review of Educational Research, 70, 419-441. doi:10.2307/1170777
26.
GutiérrezK. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148-164. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
27.
GutiérrezK. D.Baquedano-LópezP.TejedaC. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 286-303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733
28.
GutiérrezK. D.JurowA. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 565-598. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
29.
HamiltonC. (2018). Bilingualism as a borderlands: Spanish-English bilingual youth’s Mestiza consciousness and designed schooling trajectories (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin–Madison.
30.
HamiltonC.PachecoM. (2019). Bilingual youth and networks of support: Designing a formula for success on the path to college. In PachecoM.MoralesP. Z.HamiltonC. (Eds.), Transforming schooling for second language learners: Policies, pedagogies, and practices (pp. 199-216). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
31.
JiménezK. P. (2006). “Start with the land”: Groundwork for Chicana pedagogy. In BernalD. D.ElenesC. A.GodinezF.VillenasS. A. (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 219-230). Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
KeatingA. (2005). Entre mundos/among worlds: New perspectives on Gloria Anzaldua. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
33.
The Latina Feminist Group. (2001). Telling to live: Latina feminist testimonios. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
MayS. A. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
MignoloW. (2000). Introduction. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1(1), 1-8.
38.
MollL.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
39.
OrellanaM. F. (2009). Translating childhoods: Immigrant youth, language, and culture. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
40.
OrtegaL. (2012). Epistemological diversity and moral ends of research in instructed SLA. Language Teaching Research, 16, 206-226. doi:10.1177/0267658311431373
41.
OrtegaL. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In MayS. (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education (pp. 32-53). New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
PachecoM. (2009). Expansive learning and Chicana/o and Latina/o students’ political-historical knowledge. Language Arts, 87, 18-29.
43.
PachecoM. (2012). Learning in/through everyday resistance: A cultural-historical perspective on community resources and curriculum. Educational Researcher, 41, 121-132. doi:10.3102/0013189X12442982
44.
PachecoM.MoralesP. Z.HamiltonC. (Eds.). (2019). Transforming schooling for second language learners: Policies, pedagogies, and practices. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
45.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97. doi:10.3102/0013189X12441244
46.
PavlenkoA.BlackledgeA. (Eds.). (2004). Negotiation of identity in multilingual contexts. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
47.
PérezE. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
48.
PotowskiK. (2004). Student Spanish use and investment in a dual immersion classroom: Implications for second language acquisition and heritage language maintenance. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 75-101.
49.
SaldañaJ. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research: Understanding qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
ScheurichJ. J.YoungM. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased?Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16. doi:10.2307/1176879
51.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York.
52.
VenegasP. (2016). Bilingual teachers’ holistic bilingual and bicultural becoming: Situated professional identities across multiple communities of practice (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Wisconsin–Madison.
53.
ZentellaA. C. (April, 1995). The “Chiquitafication” of U.S. Latinos and their languages, or why we need an anthropolitical linguistics. SALSA III: Proceedings of a Symposium on Language and Society, Austin, TX.
54.
ZentellaA. C. (1997). Growing up bilingual. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
55.
ZentellaA. C. (Ed.). (2005). Building on strength: Language and literacy in Latino families and communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
